Why do genotypes of Picea glauca differ in their growth response to elevated CO 2?

Tree Physiology

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 16-21

  Zhang, Junyan ^a,b   Mycroft, Erin E ^b   Adams, Greg ^c   Reekie, Ed ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF MOUNTAIN HAZARDS AND ENVIRONMENT   (China)

^b ACADIA UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c JD Irving Limited   (Canada)

Author keywords

allocation patterns; canopy structure; carbon isotope ratio; genetic variation; global change; relative growth rate

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CANOPY ARCHITECTURE; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON ISOTOPE; CONIFEROUS TREE; GENOTYPE; GLOBAL CHANGE; GROWTH RATE; GROWTH RESPONSE; INTRASPECIFIC VARIATION; ISOTOPIC RATIO; MORPHOLOGY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS; DRUG EFFECT; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METABOLISM; MICROCLIMATE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; SEEDLING; SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPRUCE;

BIOMASS; CARBON DIOXIDE; ENVIRONMENT, CONTROLLED; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PICEA; PLANT SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS TECHNIQUES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SEEDLING; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

PICEA GLAUCA;

EID: 79952657699     PISSN: 0829318X     EISSN: 17584469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpq097     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Ainsworth, E.A. and S.P. Long. 2005. What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE)? A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol. 165:351-372. (Pubitemid 40177950)
2. Atkin, O.K., M. Schortemeyer, N. McFarlaneand and J.R. Evans. 1999. The response of fast-and slow-growing Acacia species to elevated atmospheric CO2: an analysis of the underlying components of relative growth rate. Oecologia 120:544-554. (Pubitemid 29452243)
3. Chapin III, F.S., A.J. Bloom, C.B. Field and R.H. Waring. 1987. Plant responses to multiple environmental factors. Biosciences 37:49-57.
4. Deleuze, C., J.C. Hervé, F. Colin and L. Ribeyrolles. 1996. Modeling crown shape of Picea abies: spacing effects. Can. J. For. Res. 26:1957-1965.
5. Ghannoum, O., N.G. Phillips, J.P. Conroy, R.A. Smith, R.D. Attard, R. Woodfield, B.A. Logan, J.D. Lewis and D.T. Tissue. 2010. Exposure to preindustrial, current and future atmospheric CO2 and temperature differentially affects growth and photosynthesis in Eucalyptus. Global Change Biol. 16:303-319.
6. Grime, J.P. 1977. Evidence for the existence of three primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. Am. Nat. 111:1169-1195.
7. Koehn, A.C., J.H. Roberds and R.L. Doudrick. 2003. Variation among slash pine families in chlorophyll fluorescence traits. Can. J. For. Res. 33:1102-1109. (Pubitemid 36990235)
8. Lambers, H., F.S. Chapin III and T.L. Pons. 1998. Plant physiological ecology. Springer, New York.
9. Lau, J.A., R.G. Shaw, P.B. Reich, F.H. Shaw and P. Tiffin. 2007. Strong ecological but weak evolutionary effects of elevated CO2 on a recombinant inbred population of Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytol. 175:351-362. (Pubitemid 46985484)
10. Liu, N., Q.L. Dang and W.H. Parker. 2006. Genetic variation of Populus tremuloides in ecophysiological responses to CO2 elevation. Can. J. Bot. 84:294-302. (Pubitemid 43965892)
11. Marshall, J.D., G.E. Rehfeldt and R.A. Monserud. 2001. Family differences in height growth and photosynthetic traits in three conifers. Tree Physiol. 21:727-734. (Pubitemid 32818001)
12. Morris, W.F., M.B. Traw and J. Bergelson. 2006. On testing for a tradeoff between constitutive and induced resistance. Oikos 112:102-110.
13. Mycroft, E.E., J. Zhang, G. Adams and E. Reekie. 2009. Elevated CO2 will not select for enhanced growth in white spruce despite genotypic variation in response. Basic Appl. Ecol. 10: 349-357.
14. Poorter, H. and M.L. Navas. 2003. Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2: on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytol. 157:175-198. (Pubitemid 36186146)
15. Roumet, C., G. Laurent and J. Roy. 1999. Leaf structure and chemical composition as reflected by elevated CO2: genotypic responses of two perennial grasses. New Phytol. 143:73-81. (Pubitemid 29373210)
16. Spinnler, D., P. Egli and Ch. Körner. 2003. Provenance effects and allometry in beech and spruce under elevated CO2 and nitrogen on two different forest soils. Basic Appl. Ecol. 4:467-478. (Pubitemid 37224298)
17. Steinger, T., A. Stephan and B. Schmid. 2007. Predicting adaptive evolution under elevated atmospheric CO2 in the perennial grass Bromus erectus. Global Change Biol. 13:1028-1039. (Pubitemid 46672538)
18. Thomas, S.C. and M. Jasieński. 1996. Genetic variability and the nature of microevolutionary responses to elevated CO2. In Carbon Dioxide, Populations, and Communities. Eds. Ch. Körner and F.A. Bazzaz. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 51-81.
19. Wang, X.Z., P.S. Curtis, K.S. Pregitzer and D.R. Zak. 2000. Genotypic variation in physiological and growth responses of Populus tremuloides to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration. Tree Physiol. 20:1019-1028.
20. Wieneke, S., D. Prati, R. Brandl, J. Stöcklin and H. Auge. 2004. Genetic variation in Sanguisorba minor after 6 years in situ selection under elevated CO2. Global Change Biol. 10:1389-1401. (Pubitemid 39052127)