Understanding belief using citation networks

Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 389-393

  Greenberg, Steven A ^a,b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Citation

Indexed keywords

CITATION ANALYSIS; DOCUMENTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SHORT SURVEY; SOCIAL BELIEF;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLICATION BIAS;

EID: 79952647303     PISSN: 13561294     EISSN: 13652753     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01646.x     Document Type: Short Survey

References (8)

1. Greenberg, S. A. (2009) How citation distortions create unfounded authority: analysis of a citation network. British Medical Journal, 339, b2680.
2. Garfield, E. (1955) Citation indexes for science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122, 108-111.
3. Barabasi, A. L. & Albert, R. (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 509-512.
4. Bergstrom, C. T., West, J. D. & Wiseman, M. A. (2008) The Eigenfactor metrics. Journal of Neuroscience, 28, 11433-11434.
5. Davis, P. M. (2008) Eigenfactor: does the principle of repeated improvement result in better journal impact estimates than raw citation counts? Journal of American Society for Information Science & Technology, 59, 2186-2188.
6. Kleinberg, J. (1998) Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Proceedings of the ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms. Available at: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/kleinber/auth.pdf (last accessed 24 January 2009). 668-677.
7. Editorial (2009) Accurately reporting research. Nature Cell Biology, 11, 1045.
8. Fergusson, D. (2009) Inappropriate referencing in research. British Medical Journal, 339, b2049.