An ontology for coordination

Applied Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 235-265

  Smith, Ben Lithgow ^a   Tamma, Valentina ^a   Wooldridge, Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEMANTICS;

ACTIVITY RESOURCES; ADVERSE OUTCOMES; COORDINATION MECHANISMS; DECENTRALISED; INDEPENDENT AGENTS; ONTOLOGICAL APPROACH; ONTOLOGY'S; PROPERTY; SHARED ONTOLOGIES; SYSTEM AGENTS;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 79952646168     PISSN: 08839514     EISSN: 10876545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08839514.2011.553376     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Ben-Ari, M. 1990. Principles of concurrent and distributed programming. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
2. Decker, K., and V. R. Lesser. 1995. Designing a family of coordination algorithms. In Proceedings of 1st International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS-95). San Francisco (CA, USA). 73-80. Menlo Park, CA, USA: AAAI Press.
3. Durfee, E. 1993. Organizations, plans, and schedules: An interdisciplinary perspective on coordinating ai systems. Journal of Intelligent Systems, Special Issue on the Social Context of Intelligent Systems 3(2-4): 2-4.
4. Durfee, E. H. 1988. Coordination of distributed problem solvers. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5. Friedman-Hill, E. 2003. Jess in action: Java rule-based systems. Greenwich, CT, USA:Manning Publications Co.
6. Genesereth, M. R. 1991. Knowledge interchange format. In Principles of knowledge representation and reasoning, KR'91, Proceedings of the second conference, eds. J. Allen, R. Fikes, and E. Sandewell, 599-600. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann Publisher.
7. Malone, T. W., and K. Crowston. 1994. The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys 26 (1): 87-119.
8. Moyaux, T., B. Lithgow-Smith, S. Paurobally, V. Tamma, and M. Wooldridge. 2006. Towards service-oriented ontology-based coordination. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Web Services (ICWS 2006): 265-274, Chicago, IL, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
9. Singh, M. 2005. Formal specification and enactment. In Service-oriented computing: Semantics, processes, agents, eds. M. Singh and M. Huhns, 281-303. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
10. Singh, M. P. 1998. A customizable coordination service for autonomous agents. In Intelligent Agents IV (LNAI Volume 1365), eds. M. P. Singh, A. Rao, and M. J. Wooldridge, 93-106. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. (Pubitemid 128044912)
11. Singh, M. P. 2000. Synthesizing coordination requirements for heterogeneous autonomous agents. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3:107-132.
12. Studer, R., V. Benjamins, and D. Fensel. 1998. Knowledge engineering, principles and methods. Data and Knowledge Engineering 25 (1-2): 161-197.
13. Tamma, V., C. van Aart, T. Moyaux, S. Paurobally, B. Lithgow-Smith, and M. Wooldridge. 2005. An ontological framework for dynamic coordination. In Proc. of 4th Int. Semantic Web Conf. (ISWC 2005), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Galway (Ireland), 638-652. Berlin: Springer.
14. von Martial, F. 1990. Interactions among autonomous planning agents. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
15. von Martial, F. 1992. Coordinating plans of autonomous agents. New York: Springer-Verlag.