AQUIK®: Starter set of ambulatory quality indicators developed by the German National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians;KBV entwickelt starter-set ambulanter qualitätsindikatoren - AQUIK®-set

Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 54-63

  Kleudgen, Susanne ^a   Diel, Franziska ^a   Burgdorf, Friederike ^a   Quasdorf, Ingrid ^a   De Cruppé, Werner ^b   Geraedts, Max ^b  

^a Kassenärztlichen Bundesvereinigung   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WITTEN HERDECKE   (Germany)

Author keywords

indicator development; indicator set; quality indicators; quality measure; quality measurement; RAND UCLA method

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952631088     PISSN: 18659217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (Hrsg); KBV entwickelt Starter-Set ambulanter Qualitätsindikatoren, Ergebnisse des Projektes AQUIK® - Ambulante Qualitätsindikatoren und Kennzahlen", Berlin, 2009, ISBN 978-3-00-028074-0., URL: http://www.aquik.de.
2. Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen (2009): Koordination und Integration - Gesundheitsversorgung in einer Gesellschaft des längeren Lebens, Sondergutachten 2009.
3. L.I. Iezzoni The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 58 6 1994 1822 1826
4. Ärztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin (Hrsg.); Manual Qualitätsindikatoren. ÄZQ Schriftenreihe, Band 36, Berlin, 2009, ISBN 978-3940218-551.
5. Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (Hrsg); Ambulante Qualitätsindikatoren und Kennzahlen (AQUIK), Ergebnisse der Organisationsbefragung 2007, URL: http://www.aquik.de.
6. Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung: Qualitätsbericht 2007, Berlin, 2008.
7. Brook RH: The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Clinical Practice Guideline Development: Methodology Perspectives, AHCPR Pub.1994;No.95-0009.
8. Marshall et al.: Measuring general pracitice: a demonstration project to develop and test a set of primary care clinical quality indicators. ISBN 0-8330-3425-1, The Nuffield Trust, 2003.
9. Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders: Methods for Developing Quality Indicators: Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135:647-652.
10. Brook RH. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. In: McCormick KA, Moore SR, Siegel, R, eds. U.S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Office of the Forum for Quality and Effectiveness in Health Care. Clinical Practice Guideline Development: Methodology Perspectives. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; 1994:59-70.
11. P.G. Shekelle, M.R. Chassin, and R.E. Park Assessing the predictive validity of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method criteria for performing carotid endarterectomy Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 14 1998 707 727 (Pubitemid 29029300)
12. P.G. Shekelle, J.P. Kahan, S.J. Bernstein, L.L. Leape, C.J. Kamberg, and R.E. Park The reproducibility of a method to identify the overuse and underuse of medical procedures N Engl J Med. 338 1998 1888 1895 (Pubitemid 28287863)
13. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organisations (JCAHO): www.jcaho.org.