An inexact chance-constrained programming model for water quality management in Binhai New Area of Tianjin, China

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 409, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1757-1773

  Xie, Y L ^a   Li, Y P ^a   Huang, G H ^a   Li, Y F ^a   Chen, L R ^a  

^a NORTH CHINA ELECTRIC POWER UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Chance constrained; Interval; Management; Policy analysis; Regional economy; Uncertainty; Water quality

Indexed keywords

CHANCE-CONSTRAINED; INTERVAL; POLICY ANALYSIS; REGIONAL ECONOMY; UNCERTAINTY;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; LINEAR PROGRAMMING; PLANNING; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; QUALITY CONTROL; QUALITY MANAGEMENT; REGIONAL PLANNING; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WASTEWATER; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT;

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; OPTIMIZATION; POLICY ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; REGIONAL ECONOMY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WASTEWATER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CHINA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FLUID INTAKE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; QUALITY CONTROL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEWAGE EFFLUENT; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WASTE WATER RECYCLING; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATER STANDARD; WATER SUPPLY;

CHINA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; FRESH WATER; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER POLLUTION; WATER SUPPLY;

CHINA; TIANJIN;

EID: 79952630990     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.01.036     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Azaiez M.N., Hariga M., Al-Harkan I. A chance-constrained multi-period model for a special multi-reservoir system. Comput Oper Res 2005, 32:1337-1351.
2. Ball J.E., Jenks R., Aubourg D. An assessment of the availability of pollutant constituents onroad surfaces. Sci Total Environ 1998, 209:243-254.
3. Brouwer R., Hofkes M., Linderhof V. General equilibrium modeling of the direct and indirect economic impacts of water quality improvements in the Netherlands at national and riverbasin scale. Ecol Econ 2008, 66:127-140.
4. Burn D.H., McBean E.A. Application of nonlinear optimization to water quality. Appl Math Model 1987, 111:438-446.
5. Chandra R., Knight R., Omlin C.W. Renosterveld conservation in South Africa: a case study for handling uncertainty in knowledge-based neural networks for environmental management. J Environ Inform 2009, 13(1):56-65.
6. Chang N.B., Chen H.W., Ning S.K. Identification of river water quality using the fuzzy synthetic valuation approach. J Environ Manage 2001, 63:293-305.
7. Chapra S.C. Surface water-quality modeling 1997, 534-558. Mc Graw-Hill, New York.
8. Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Response to decision problems under risk and chance constrained programming: Dilemmas in the transitions. Manage Sci 1983, 29:750-753.
9. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Kirby P. Chance constrained programming: an extension of statistical method. Optimizing Methods in Statistics 1972, 391-402. Academic Press, New York.
10. Chen H.W., Chang N.B. Water pollution control in the river basin by genetic algorithm-based fuzzy multi-objective programming modeling. Water Sci Technol 1998, 37(8):55-63.
11. Chen Z., Zhao L., Lee K. Environmental risk assessment of offshore produced water discharges using a hybrid fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach. Environ Modell Softw 2010, 25:782-792.
12. Conway T.M., Lathrop R.G. Alternative land use regulations and environmental impacts: assessing future land use in an urbanizing watershed. Landscape Urban Plann 2005, 71:1-15.
13. Dotto C.B.S., Deletic A., Fletcher T.D. Analysis of parameter uncertainty of a flow and quality storm water model. Water Sci Technol 2009, 60(3):717-725.
14. Dupacova J., Gaivoronski A., Kos Z., Szantai T. Stochastic programming in water management: a case study and a comparison of solution techniques. Eur J Oper Res 1991, 52:28-44.
15. Ellis J.H. Stochastic programs for identifying critical structural collapse mechanisms. Appl Math Model 1991, 15:367-379.
16. Freni G., Mannina G., Viviani G. Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: The influence of likelihood measure formulation in the GLUE methodology. Sci Total Environ 2009, 408(1):138-145.
17. Freni G., Mannina G., Viviani G. Assessment of the integrated urban water quality model complexity through identifiability analysis. Water Res 2011, 45:37-50.
18. Huang G.H. A hybrid inexact-stochastic water management model. Eur J Oper Res 1998, 107:137-158.
19. Huang G.H., Loucks D.P. An inexact two-stage stochastic programming model for water resources management under uncertainty. Civ Eng Environ Syst 2000, 17(2):95-118.
20. Huang G.H., Baetz B.W., Patry G.G. An interval linear programming approach for municipal solid waste management planning under uncertainty. Civ Eng Syst 1992, 9:319-335.
21. Huang G.H., Baetz B.W., Patry G.G. A gray fuzzy linear programming approach for municipal solid-waste management planning under uncertainty. Civ Eng Syst 1993, 10(2):123-146.
22. Huang G.H., Baetz B.W., Patty G.G. Grey dynamic programming for solid waste management planning under uncertainty. ASCE J Urban Plann Dev 1994, 120:132-156.
23. Infanger G. Monte Carlo (importance) sampling within a Benders decomposition algorithm for stochastic linear programs. Ann Oper Res 1993, 39:69-81.
24. Infanger G., Morton D.P. Cut sharing for multistage stochastic linear programs with interstage dependency. Math Program 1996, 75:241-251.
25. Karmakar S., Mujumdar P.P. Grey fuzzy optimization model for water quality management of a river system. Adv Water Resour 2006, 29:1088-1105.
26. Karmakar S., Mujumdar P.P. An inexact optimization approach for river water-quality management. J Environ Manage 2006, 81:233-248.
27. Karmakar S., Mujumdar P.P. A two-phase grey fuzzy optimization approach for water quality management of a river system. Adv Water Resour 2007, 30:1218-1235.
28. Kenneth H.R., Steven C.C. Confirmation of water quality models. Ecol Modell 1983, 20:113-133.
29. Lee C.S., Chang S.P. Interactive fuzzy optimization for an economic and environmental balance in a river system. Water Res 2005, 39:221-231.
30. Lekkas T., Kolokythas G., Nikolaou A., Kostopoulou M., Kotrikla A., Gatidou G. Evaluation of the pollution of the surface waters of Greece from the priority compounds of list II, 76/464/EEC directive, and other toxic compounds. Environ Int 2004, 30:995-1007.
31. Li YP, Huang GH. Two-stage planning for sustainable water-quality management under uncertainty. J Environ Manage 2009;90(8):2402-13.
32. Li J.B., Huang G.H., Zeng G.M., Maqsood I., Huang Y.F. An integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for risk assessment of Ground water contamination. J Environ Manage 2007, 82:173-188.
33. Li Y.P., Huang G.H., Huang Y.F., Zhou H.D. A multistage fuzzy-stochastic programming model for supporting sustainable water-resources allocation and management. Environ Modell Softw 2009, 24:786-797.
34. Liu L., Huang G.H., Liu Y., Fuller G.A. A fuzzy-stochastic robust programming model for regional air quality management under uncertainty. Eng Optim 2003, 35(2):177-199.
35. Maksimovic C., Makropoulos C.K. Integrating river basin management and the coastal zone: the (blue) Danube and the (Black) Sea. Water Sci Technol 2002, 46:187-194.
36. Morgan D.R., Eheart J.W., Valocchi A.J. Aquifer remediation design under uncertainty using a new chance constrained programming technique. Water Resour Res 1993, 29:551-568.
37. Mujumdar P.P., Saxena P. A stochastic dynamic programming model for stream water quality management. Sadhana 2004, 29(5):477-497.
38. O'Connor D.J., Dobbins W.E. Mechanisms of reaeration in natural streams. Am Soc Civ Eng 1958, 123:641-684.
39. Ouarda T.B.M.J., Labadie J.W. Chance-constrained optimal control for multireservoir system optimization and risk analysis. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 2001, 15(3):185-204.
40. Pereira M.V.F., Pinto L.M.V.G. Multi-stage stochastic optimization applied to energy planning. Math Program 1991, 52:359-375.
41. Refsgaard J.C., Van der Sluijs J.P., Højberg A.L., Vanrolleghem P.A. Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - a framework and guidance. Environ Modell Softw 2007, 22:1543-1556.
42. Rehana S., Mujumdar P.P. An imprecise fuzzy risk approach for water quality management of a river system. J Environ Manage 2009, 90:3653-3664.
43. Roubcns M., Teghem J. Comparison of methodologies for fuzzy and stochastic multi-objective programming. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1991, 42:119-132.
44. Sasikumar K., Mujumdar P.P. Fuzzy optimization model for water quality management of river system. J Water Resour Plann Manage 1998, 124:79-84.
45. Slowinski R. A multicriteria fuzzy linear programming method for water supply system development planning. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1986, 19:217-237.
46. Streeter H.W., Phelps E.B. US Public Health Service 1925, Bulletin No.146, NewYork.
47. Ternes T.A., Kreckel P., Mueller J. Behavior and occurrence of estrogens in municipal sewage treatment plants. II. Aerobic batch experiments with activated sludge. Sci Total Environ 1999, 225:91-99.
48. Thomann R.V., Mueller J.A. Principles of surface water quality modeling and control 1987, Harper &Row, NewYork.
49. Tianjin Environmental Protection Agency Tianjin environmental quality report 2005, 24-32.
50. Tianjin Environmental Protection Agency Tianjin environmental quality report 2006, 26-35.
51. Tianjin Environmental Protection Agency Tianjin environmental quality report 2007, 28-37.
52. Tianjin Environmental Protection Agency Tianjin comprehensive discharge standard of sewage 2008.
53. Tianjin Municipal Bureau of Water Conservancy Tianjin investigation report on surface water pollution prevention and control 2007.
54. Watanabe T., Ellis J.H. A joint chance-constrained programming model with row dependence. Eur J Oper Res 1994, 77:325-343.
55. Willems P. Quantification and relative comparison of different types of uncertainties in sewer water quality modelling. Water Res 2008, 42(13):3539-3551.
56. Wu S.M., Huang G.H., Guo H.C. An interactive inexact-fuzzy approach for multiobjective planning of water resources systems. Water Sci Technol 1997, 36:235-242.
57. Yang N., Wen F. A chance constrained programming approach to transmission system expansion planning. Electric Power Syst Res 2005, 75:171-177.
58. Zam Y., Daneshmand A. A linear approximation method for solving a special class of the chance constrained programming problem. Eur J Oper Res 1995, 80:213-225.
59. Zhang X.D., Huang GH, Nie XH Optimal decision schemes for agricultural water quality management planning with imprecise objective. Agr Water Manage 2009, 96(12):1723-1731.
60. Zhao N., Liu Y., Chen J. Regional industrial production's spatial distribution and water pollution control: a plant-level aggregation method for the case of a small region in China. Sci Total Environ 2009, 407(17):4946-4953.
61. Zhu Z.P., ReVelle C. A siting model for regional wastewater treatment systems: the chain configuration case. Water Resour Res 1988, 24:137-145.