Development of a dependency treebank for Russian and its possible applications in NLP

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2002

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 852-856

  Boguslavsky, Igor ^a   Chardin, Ivan ^a   Grigorieva, Svetlana ^a   Grigoriev, Nikolai ^a   Iomdin, Leonid ^a   Kreidlin, Leonid ^a   Frid, Nadezhda ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATION TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TREEBANKS;

FORESTRY;

EID: 79952628251     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Apresjan J.D., Boguslavskij I.M., Iomdin L.L., Lazurskij A.V., Sannikov V.Z. and Tsinman L.L. (1992). The linguistics of a Machine Translation System. Meta, 37 (1), pp. 97-112.
2. Apresjan J.D., Boguslavskij I.M., Iomdin L.L., Lazurskij A.V., Sannikov V.Z. and Tsinman L.L. (1993). Système de traduction automatique ETAP. La Traductique. P.Bouillon and A.Clas (eds). Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal.
3. Boguslavsky I.M., Grigorieva S.A., Grigoriev N.V, Kreidlin L.G, Frid N.E. (2000). Dependency Treebank for Russian: Concepts, Tools, Types of Information. Proceedings of the 18th Conference on Computational Linguistics. Vol 2, 987-991, Saarbrücken.
4. Chardin I.S. (2001). Using a tagged corpus to resolve syntactic ambiguity in the ETAP-3 Linguistic Processor. Proceedings of the 2nd All-Russian Conference Theory and Practice of Speech Resources (ARSO-2001). Moscow State University, Moscow. [in Russian].
5. Hajicova E., Panevova J., Sgall P. (1998). Language Resources Need Annotations To Make Them Really Reusable: The Prague Dependency Treebank. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation, pp. 713-718.
6. Kurohashi S., Nagao M. (1998). Building a Japanese Parsed Corpus while Improving the Parsing System. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation, pp. 719-724.
7. Language Resources (1997). Survey of the State of the Art in Human Language Technology. Eds. G. B. Varile, A. Zampolli, Linguistica Computazionale, vol. 12-13, pp. 381- 408.
8. Marcus M. P., Santorini B., and Marcinkiewicz M.-A. (1993). Building a large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, Vol. 19, No. 2.
9. TEI Guidelines (1994). TEI Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange (P3). URL: http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/TEI.html.
10. Brants T., Skut W., and Uszkoreit H. (1999). Syntactic annotation of a German newspaper corpus. Proceedings of the ATALA Treebank Workshop, pp. 69-76, Paris, France.
11. Van der Beek L., Bouma G., Malouf R., van Noord G. (2001). The Alpino Dependency Treebank, In: Proceedings of LINC2001.
12. Sichinava, D.V. (2001). On the problem of building Russian linguistic corpora for the Internet. URL: www.mccme.ru/ling/mitrius/article.html [in Russian].
13. Bemova A., Hajic J., Hladka B., Panevova J. (1999). Morphological and Syntactic Tagging of the Prague Dependency Treebank. URL: http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/296119.html.