Phenotypic plasticity of introduced versus native purple loosestrife: Univariate and multivariate reaction norm approaches

Biological Invasions

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 819-829

  Chun, Young Jin ^a  

^a Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KRIBB)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Common garden; Genetic environment (G E) interaction; Introduced species; Lythrum salicaria; Reaction norm

Indexed keywords

ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; DICOTYLEDON; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; GARDEN; GROWING SEASON; INTRODUCED SPECIES; LIFE HISTORY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NATIVE SPECIES; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY;

EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA;

LYSIMACHIA; LYTHRACEAE; LYTHRUM SALICARIA;

EID: 79952625661     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-010-9871-z     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Ågren J, Ericson L (1996) Population structure and morph-specific fitness differences in tristylous Lythrum salicaria. Evolution 50: 126-139. doi: 10. 2307/2410787.
2. Alpert P, Simms EL (2002) The relative advantages of plasticity and fixity in different environments: when is it good for a plant to adjust? Evol Ecol 16: 285-297.
3. Bastlová D, Květ J (2002) Differences in dry weight partitioning and flowering phenology between native and non-native plants of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.). Flora 197: 332-340. doi: 10. 1078/0367-2530-00049.
4. Bastlová D, Čížková H, Bastl M, Květ J (2004) Growth of Lythrum salicaria and Phragmites australis plants originating from a wide geographical area: response to nutrient and water supply. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 13: 259-271. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1466-822X. 2004. 00089. x.
5. Bastlová-Hanzélyová D (2001) Comparative study of native and invasive plants of Lythrum salicaria L.: population characteristics, site and community relationships. In: Brundu J, Brock J, Camarda I, Child L, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions: species ecology and ecosystem management. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp 33-41.
6. Bedford BL, Walbridge MR, Aldous A (1999) Patterns in nutrient availability and plant diversity of temperate North American wetlands. Ecology 80: 2151-2169. doi: 10. 1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2151: PINAAP]2. 0. CO; 2.
7. Blossey B, Nötzold R (1995) Evolution of increased competitive ability in invasive nonindigenous plants: a hypothesis. J Ecol 83: 887-889. doi: 10. 2307/2261425.
8. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144: 1-11. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-005-0070-z.
9. Bridgham SD, Pastor J, Janssens JA, Chapin C, Malterer TJ (1996) Multiple limiting gradients in peatlands: a call for a new paradigm. Wetlands 16: 45-65.
10. Burns JH (2004) A comparison of invasive and non-invasive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experimental nutrient and water gradients. Divers Distrib 10: 387-397. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1366-9516. 2004. 00105. x.
11. Burns JH, Winn AA (2006) A comparison of plastic responses to competition by invasive and non-invasive congeners in the Commelinaceae. Biol Invasions 8: 797-807. doi: 10. 1007/s10530-005-3838-5.
12. Chun YJ, Collyer ML, Moloney KA, Nason JD (2007) Phenotypic plasticity of native vs. invasive purple loosestrife: a two state multivariate approach. Ecology 88: 1499-1512. doi: 10. 1890/06-0856.
13. Collyer ML, Adams DC (2007) Analysis of two-state multivariate phenotypic change. Ecology 88: 683-692. doi: 10. 1890/06-0727.
14. Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88: 528-534. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1365-2745. 2000. 00473. x.
15. DeWalt SJ, Denslow JS, Hamrick JL (2004) Biomass allocation, growth, and photosynthesis of genotypes from native and introduced ranges of the tropical shrub Clidemia hirta. Oecologia 138: 521-531. doi: 10. 1007/s00442-003-1462-6.
16. Edwards KR, Adams MS, Květ J (1995) Invasion history and ecology of Lythrum salicaria in North America. In: Pyšek P, Prach K, Rejmánek M, Wade M (eds) Plant invasions-general aspects and special problems. SPB Academic Publishing, Amsterdam, pp 161-180.
17. Edwards KR, Adams MS, Květ J (1998) Differences between European native and American invasive populations of Lythrum salicaria. Appl Veg Sci 9: 267-280. doi: 10. 2307/1478957.
18. Fry JD (1992) The mixed-model analysis of variance applied to quantitative genetics: biological meaning of the parameters. Evolution 46: 540-550. doi: 10. 2307/2409870.
19. Hastwell GT, Panetta FD (2005) Can differential responses to nutrients explain the success of environmental weeds? J Veg Sci 16: 77-84. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1654-1103. 2005. tb02340. x.
20. Hinz HL, Schwarzlaender M (2004) Comparing invasive plants from their native and exotic range: what can we learn for biological control? Weed Technol 18: 1533-1541. doi: 10. 1614/0890-037X(2004)018[1533: CIPFTN]2. 0. CO; 2.
21. Huenneke L, Hamburg S, Koide R, Mooney H, Vitousek P (1990) Effects of soil resources on plant invasion and community structure in Californian serpentine grassland. Ecology 71: 478-491. doi: 10. 2307/1940302.
22. Hulme PE (2008) Phenotypic plasticity and plant invasions: is it all Jack? Funct Ecol 22: 3-7. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2435. 2007. 01369. x.
23. Kaufman SR, Smouse PE (2001) Comparing indigenous and introduced populations of Melaleuca quinquenervia (Cav.) Blake; response of seedlings to water and pH levels. Oecologia 127: 487-494. doi: 10. 1007/s004420000621.
24. Kolb A, Alpert P, Enters D, Holzapfel C (2002) Patterns of invasion within a grassland community. J Ecol 90: 871-881. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1365-2745. 2002. 00719. x.
25. Leishman MR, Thomson VP (2005) Experimental evidence for the effects of additional water, nutrients and physical disturbance on invasive plants in low fertility Hawkesbury Sandstone soils, Sydney, Australia. J Ecol 93: 38-49. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1365-2745. 2004. 00938. x.
26. Mal TK, Lovett-Doust J, Lovett-Doust L, Mulligan GA (1992) The biology of Canadian weeds 100. Lythrum salicaria. Can J Plant Sci 72: 1305-1330.
27. Mann NR, Schafer RE, Singpurwalla ND (1974) Methods for statistical analysis of reliability and life data. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
28. Maron JL, Jefferies RL (1999) Bush lupine mortality, altered resource availability and alternative vegetation states. Ecology 80: 443-454. doi: 10. 1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0443: BLMARA]2. 0. CO; 2.
29. Marshall DR, Jain SK (1968) Phenotypic plasticity of Avena fatua and A. barbata. Am Nat 102: 457-467. doi: 10. 1086/282558.
30. Milberg P, Lamont BB, Pérez-Fernández MA (1999) Survival and growth of native and exotic composites in response to a nutrient gradient. Plant Ecol 145: 125-132.
31. Montague JL, Barrett SCH, Eckert CG (2008) Re-establishment of clinal variation in flowering time among introduced populations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria, Lythraceae). J Evol Biol 21: 234-245. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1420-9101. 2007. 01456. x.
32. Olsson K, Ågren J (2002) Latitudinal population differentiation in phenology, life history and flower morphology in the perennial herb Lythrum salicaria. J Evol Biol 15: 983-996. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1420-9101. 2002. 00457. x.
33. Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
34. Pigliucci M (2003) Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Ecol Lett 6: 265-272. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1461-0248. 2003. 00428. x.
35. Pigliucci M, Schlichting CD (1995) Reaction norms of Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae) III. Response to nutrients in 26 populations from a worldwide collection. Am J Bot 82: 1117-1125. doi: 10. 2307/2446064.
36. Rejmánek M, Richardson DM (1996) What attributes make some plant species more invasive? Ecology 77: 1655-1661. doi: 10. 2307/2265768.
37. Rice KJ, Mack RN (1991) Ecological genetics of Bromus tectorum. III. The demography of reciprocally sown populations. Oecologia 88: 91-101. doi: 10. 1007/BF00328408.
38. Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J, Pigliucci M (2006) Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecol Lett 9: 981-993. doi: 10. 1111/j. 1461-0248. 2006. 00950. x.
39. Schlichting CD (1986) The evolution of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 17: 667-693. doi: 10. 1146/annurev. es. 17. 110186. 003315.
40. Simons AM (2003) Invasive aliens and sampling bias. Ecol Lett 6: 278-280. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1461-0248. 2003. 00430. x.
41. Stuckey RL (1980) Distributional history of Lythrum salicaria (purple loosestrife) in North America. Bartonia 47: 3-20.
42. Sultan SE (2003) Phenotypic plasticity in plants: a case study in ecological development. Evol Dev 5: 25-33. doi: 10. 1046/j. 1525-142X. 2003. 03005. x.
43. Sultan SE, Bazzaz FA (1993) Phenotypic plasticity in Polygonum persicaria. III. The evolution of ecological breadth for nutrient environment. Evolution 47: 1050-1071. doi: 10. 2307/2409974.
44. Thompson DQ, Stuckey RL, Thompson EB (1987) Spread, impact, and control of purple oosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) in North American Wetlands. US Fish and Wildlife Service. Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center Home Page, Jamestown, ND, 55 pages. http://www. npwrc. usgs. gov/resource/1999/loosstrf/loosstrf. htm (Version 04JUN99) Accessed 8 Jul 2010.
45. Thormann MN, Bayley SE (1997) Response of aboveground net primary plant production to nitrogen and phosphorous fertilization in peatlands in southern boreal Alberta, Canada. Wetlands 17: 502-512.
46. Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, de Jong G, Scheiner SM, Schlichting CD, van Tienderen PH (1995) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 212-217. doi: 10. 1016/S0169-5347(00)89061-8.
47. Warner RM (2008) Applied statistics: from bivariate through multivariate techniques. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
48. Wedin DA, Tilman D (1996) Influence of nitrogen loading and species composition on the carbon balance of grasslands. Science 274: 1720-1723. doi: 10. 1126/science. 274. 5293. 1720.
49. Williams DG, Mack RN, Black RA (1995) Ecophysiology of introduced Pennisetum setaceum on Hawaii: the role of phenotypic plasticity. Ecology 76: 1569-1580. doi: 10. 2307/1938158.