Energy behaviour as a collectif

Energy Efficiency

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 303-319

  Galis, Vasilis ^a   Gyberg, Per ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Collectif; Energy behaviour; Household; Lifestyle; Materiality

Indexed keywords

COLLECTIF; ENERGY BEHAVIOUR; HOUSEHOLD; LIFESTYLE; MATERIALITY;

COLLEGE BUILDINGS; TEACHING;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ACTOR NETWORK THEORY; BUILDING; ENERGY USE; HETEROGENEITY; HOUSEHOLD ENERGY; LIFESTYLE;

EID: 79952623167     PISSN: 1570646X     EISSN: 15706478     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12053-010-9087-1     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aune, M. (2007). Energy comes home. Energy Policy, 35, 5457-5465.
2. Berker, I. (2006). The politics of 'actor-network theory': What can 'actor-network theory' do to make buildings more energy efficient. Science, Technology & Innovation Studies, Special Issue 1.
3. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements for a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St-Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-223) London, Sociological Review Monograph: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
4. Callon, M., & Law, J. (1995). Agency and the hybrid collectif. The South Atlantic Quarterly, 94(2), 481-507.
5. Callon, M., & Law, J. (1997). After the individual society: Lessons on collectivity from science, technology and society. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 22(2), 165-182.
6. Galis, V. (2006). From shrieks to technical reports: Technology, disability and political processes in building Athens Metro. Department of Technology and Social Change Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, No. 374.
7. Gieryn, T. F. (2002). What buildings do. Theory and Society, 31(1), 35-74.
8. Guy & Shove (2000). A sociology of energy, buildings and the environment. In Constructing Knowledge, Designing Practice. Routledge Research Global Environmental Change Series, 5.
9. Gyberg, P., & Palm, J. (2009). Influencing households' energy behaviour: How is this done and on what premises? Energy Policy, 37(7), 2807-2813.
10. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The interview: From neutral stance to political involvement. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 695-727). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
11. Hallin, P. O., & Peterson, B. Å. (1986). De glömda aktörerna [The neglected actors]. Efn AES 1986, 1, Stockholm.
12. Carlsson-Kanyama, A. & Lindén, A.-L. (2002). Hushållens energianvändning [The household's energy use. Values, behaviour, lifestyles and technology]. Värderingar, beteenden, livsstilar och teknik. FMS-rapport 176, Lund University.
13. Latour, B. (1993). On technical mediation: The messenger lectures on the evolution of civilization. In Working Paper series. Lund: Institutet för Ekonomisk Forskning.
14. Latour, B. (1999). On recalling ANT. In J. Hassard & J. Law (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 15-25). Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Maxwell, J. (2002). Understanding and validity in qualitative research. In A. M. Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher's companion (pp. 37-64). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
17. Mol, A. (1999). Ontological politics. In I. J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 74-89). Oxford: Blackwell.
18. Moser, I. (2003). Road traffic accidents: The ordering of subjects, bodies and disability. Series of dissertations submitted to the Faculty of Arts, University of Oslo, no. 173. Unipub AS, Oslo.
19. Moser, I. (2006). Sociotechnical practices and difference: On the interferences between disability, gender, and class. Science Technology & Human Values, 31(5), 537-564.
20. Marres, N. (2007). Dilemmas of home improvement: Can clean energy technology mediate civic involvement in climate change? In M. Feher, G. Krikorian, & Y. McKee (Eds.), Nongovernmental politics (pp. 368-385). New York: Zone Books.
21. Nässén, J. S., Sprei, F., & Holmberg, J. (2008). Stagnating energy efficiency in the Swedish building sector: Economic organisational explanations. Energy Policy, 36, 3814-3822.
22. Palmborg, C. (1986). Social habits and energy consuming behaviour in single-family houses. Swedish Council for Building Research, Document D24, 1986. Stockholm: Byggforskningsrådet.
23. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Shove, E. (1999). Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: Theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings. Energy Policy, 26, 1105-1112.
25. Shove, E., Lutzenhiser, L., Guy, S., Hackett, B., & Wilhite, H. (1998). Energy and social systems. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change (pp. 291-325). Columbus: Battelle.
26. Statens energimyndighet (2004). Energiläget [The state of energy]. Eskilstuna.
27. Skill, K. (2008). (Re)Creating ecological action space: Householders' activities for sustainable development in Sweden. Department of Technology and Social Change. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, No. 449.
28. Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. New York: Wiley.
29. Undheim, T.-A. (2000). Getting connected: How sociologists can access the high-tech elite. STS working paper 03/00. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Center for Technology and Society. Trondheim: Institutt for tverrfaglige kulturstudier.
30. U. S Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (2005). Buildings energy data book. Available at http://buildingsdatabook. eren. doe. gov/.
31. Wilhite, H., Nakagami, H., Masuda, T., & Yamaga, Y. (1996). A cross-cultural analysis of household energy use behaviour in Japan and Norway. Energy Policy, 24(9), 795-803.
32. Woolsey-Biggart, & Lutzenhiser. (2007). Economic sociology and the social problem of energy efficiency. The American Behavioral Scientist, 50(6), 1070-1087.
33. Yates, S. M., & Aronson, E. (1983). A social psychological perspective on energy conservation in residential buildings. The American Psychologist, 38(4), 435-444.