Real-time knee adduction moment feedback for gait retraining through visual and tactile displays

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Volumn 133, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Wheeler, Jason W ^a   Shull, Pete B ^b   Besier, Thor F ^c  

^a SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^b Stanford University   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Gait retraining; Knee adduction moment; Osteoarthritis; Real time feedback

Indexed keywords

CONVENTIONAL METHODS; GAIT PATTERN; GAIT RETRAINING; HEALTHY SUBJECTS; KNEE ADDUCTION MOMENT; OSTEOARTHRITIS; REAL-TIME FEEDBACK; REAL-TIME TRAINING; SUBJECT-SPECIFIC; TACTILE DISPLAY; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TIBIO-FEMORAL JOINTS; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

GAIT ANALYSIS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

FEEDBACK;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTERNAL KNEE ADDUCTION MOMENT; FEMALE; GAIT; GAIT DISORDER; GAIT RETRAINING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KINEMATICS; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; TACTILE FEEDBACK; TRAINING; TREADMILL; VIBRATION; VISUAL FEEDBACK; CLINICAL TRIAL; EXERCISE TEST; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; KINETICS; KNEE; LEARNING; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME; TOUCH; VISION; WEIGHT BEARING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; EXERCISE TEST; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMANS; KINETICS; KNEE; KNEE JOINT; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TIME FACTORS; TOUCH; VIBRATION; VISION, OCULAR; WEIGHT-BEARING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952602440     PISSN: 01480731     EISSN: 15288951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.4003621     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Felson D.T. Nevitt M.C. Yang M. Clancy M. Niu J. Torner J.C. Lewis C.E. Aliabadi P. Sack B. McCulloch C. Zhang Y. A New Approach Yields High Rates of Radiographic Progression in Knee Osteoarthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2008, 35(10):2047-2054. ZZZZZZ, 0315-162X.
2. Andriacchi T.P. Dynamics of Knee Malalignment. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 1994, 25(3):395-403. ZZZZZZ, 0030-5898.
3. Schipplein O.D. Andriacchi T.P. Interaction Between Active and Passive Knee Stabilizers During Level Walking. J. Orthop. Res. 1991, 9(1):113-119. JOREDR, 0736-0266, 10.1002/jor.1100090114.
4. Prodromos C.C. Andriacchi T.P. Galante J.O. A Relationship Between Gait and Clinical Changes Following High Tibial Osteotomy. J. Bone Jt. Surg., Am. Vol. 1985, 67(8):1188-1194. JBJSA3, 0021-9355.
5. Thorp L.E. Sumner D.R. Block J.A. Moisio K.C. Shott S. Wimmer M.A. Knee Joint Loading Differs in Individuals With Mild Compared With Moderate Medial Knee Osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006, 54:3842-3849. ARHEAW, 0004-3591, 10.1002/art.22247.
6. Hunt M.A. Birmingham T.B. Giffin J.R. Jenkyn T.R. Associations Among Knee Adduction Moment, Frontal Plane Ground Reaction Force, and Lever Arm During Walking in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:2213-2220. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.002.
7. Hurwitz D.E. Ryals A.B. Case J.P. Block J.A. Andriacchi T.P. The Knee Adduction Moment During Gait in Subjects With Knee Osteoarthritis Is More Closely Correlated With Static Alignment Than Radiographic Disease Severity, Toe Out Angle and Pain. J. Orthop. Res. 2002, 20(1):101-107. JOREDR, 0736-0266, 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00081-X.
8. Mündermann A. Dyrby C.O. Andriacchi T.P. Secondary Gait Changes in Patients With Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis: Increased Load at the Ankle, Knee, and Hip During Walking. Arthritis Rheum. 2005, 52:2835-2844. ARHEAW, 0004-3591, 10.1002/art.21262.
9. Wada M. Imura S. Nagatani K. Baba H. Shimada S. Sasaki S. Relationship Between Gait and Clinical Results After High Tibial Osteotomy. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1998, 354:180-188. CORTBR, 0009-921X, 10.1097/00003086-199809000-00022.
10. Fregly B.J. Reinbolt J.A. Rooney K.L. Mitchell K.H. Chmielewski T.L. Design of Patient-Specific Gait Modifications for Knee Osteoarthritis Rehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 54(9):1687-1695. IEBEAX, 0018-9294, 10.1109/TBME.2007.891934.
11. Losina E. Walensky R.P. Kessler C.L. Emrani P.S. Reichmann W.M. Wright E.A. Holt H.L. Solomon D.H. Yelin E. Paltiel A.D. Katz J.N. Cost-Effectiveness of Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States: Patient Risk and Hospital Volume. Arch. Intern Med. 2009, 169(12):1113-1121. AIMDAP, 0003-9926, 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.136.
12. Kakihana W. Akai M. Nakazawa K. Takashima T. Naito K. Torii S. Effects of Laterally Wedged Insoles on Knee and Subtalar Joint Moments. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2005, 86(7):1465-1471. APMHAI, 0003-9993, 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.09.033.
13. Kakihana W. Akai M. Yamasaki N. Takashima T. Nakazawa K. Changes of Joint Moments in the Gait of normal Subjects Wearing Laterally Wedged Insoles. Am. J. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2004, 83:273-278. ZZZZZZ, 0894-9115, 10.1097/01.PHM.0000118035.71195.DE.
14. Andrews M. Noyes F.R. Hewett T.E. Andriacchi T.P. Lower Limb Alignment and Foot Angle Are Related to Stance Phase Knee Adduction in Normal Subjects: A Critical Analysis of the Reliability of Gait Analysis Data. J. Orthop. Res. 1996, 14(2):289-295. JOREDR, 0736-0266, 10.1002/jor.1100140218.
15. Guo M. Axe M.J. Manal K. The Influence of Foot Progression Angle on the Knee Adduction Moment During Walking and Stair Climbing in Pain Free Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis. Gait and Posture 2007, 26(3):436-441. GAPOFK, 0966-6362, 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.10.008.
16. Mündermann A. Asay J.L. Mündermann L. Andriacchi T.P. Implications of Increased Medio-Lateral Trunk Sway for Ambulatory Mechanics. J. Biomech. 2008, 41(1):165-170. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.07.001.
17. Fregly B.J. Computational Assessment of Combinations of Gait Modifications for Knee Osteoarthritis Rehabilitation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2008, 55:2104-2106. IEBEAX, 0018-9294, 10.1109/TBME.2008.921171.
18. Barrios J.A. Crossley K.M. Davis I.S. Gait Retraining to Reduce the Knee Adduction Moment Through Real-Time Visual Feedback of Dynamic Knee Alignment. J. Biomech. 2010, 43(11):2208-2213. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.03.040.
19. Riskowski J.L. Mikesky A.E. Bahamonde R.E. Burr D.B. Design and Validation of a Knee Brace With Feedback to Reduce the Rate of Loading. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2009, 131(8):084503. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.3148858.
20. Riskowski J.L. Gait and Neuromuscular Adaptations After Using a Feedback-Based Gait Monitoring Knee Brace. Gait and Posture 2010, 32(2):242-247. GAPOFK, 0966-6362, 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.05.002.
21. Dowling A.V. Fisher D.S. Andriacchi T.P. Gait Modification via Verbal Instruction and an Active Feedback System to Reduce Peak Knee Adduction Moment. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2010, 132(7):071007. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.4001584.
22. Shull P.B. Lurie K.L. Shin M. Besier T.F. Cutkosky M.R. Haptic Gait Retraining for Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment. IEEE Haptics Symposium 2010, 409-416.
23. Magill R.A. McCloy C.H. Research Lecture: Knowledge Is More Than We Can Talk About: Implicit Learning in Motor Skill Acquisition. Res. Q. Exerc Sport 1998, 69:104-110. ZZZZZZ, 0270-1367.
24. Pew R.W. Levels of Analysis in Motor Control. Brain Res. 1974, 71:393-400. BRREAP, 0006-8993, 10.1016/0006-8993(74)90983-4.
25. Wulf G. Schmidt R.A. Variability in Practice and Implicit Motor Learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1997, 23:987-1006. ZZZZZZ, 0278-7393, 10.1037/0278-7393.23.4.987.
26. Besier T.F. Sturnieks D.L. Alderson J.A. Lloyd D.G. Repeatability of Gait Data Using a Functional Hip Joint Centre and a Mean Helical Knee Axis. J. Biomech. 2003, 36:1159-1168. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00087-3.
27. Wrigley T.V. Simic M. Hunt M.A. Hinman R.S. Bennell K.L. Real-Time Movement Biofeedback for Walking Gait Modification in Knee Osteoarthritis. Virtual Rehabilitation International Conference 2009, 132-135, Haifa, Israel.
28. Jones L.A. Sarter N.B. Tactile Displays: Guidance for Their Design and Application. Hum. Factors 2008, 50:90-111. HUFAA6, 0018-7208, 10.1518/001872008X250638.
29. Walter J.P. D'Lima D.D. Colwell C.W. Fregly B.J. Decreased Knee Adduction Moment Does Not Guarantee Decreased Medial Contact Force During Gait. J. Orthop. Res. 2010, 28(10):1348-1354. JOREDR, 0736-0266, 10.1002/jor.21142.
30. Cappozzo A. Della Croce U. Leardini A. Chiari L. Human Movement Analysis Using Stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: Theoretical Background. Gait and Posture 2005, 21:186-196. GAPOFK, 0966-6362, 10.1016/S0966-6362(04)00025-6.
31. Schache A.G. Fregly B.J. Crossley K.M. Hinman R.S. Pandy M.G. The Effect of Gait Modification on the External Knee Adduction Moment Is Reference Frame Dependent. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 2008, 23:601-608. ZZZZZZ, 0268-0033, 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.12.008.