Identifying a minimal rheological configuration: A tool for effective and efficient constitutive modeling of soft tissues

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

Volumn 133, Issue 4, 2011, Pages

  Jordan, Petr ^a,b   Kerdok, Amy E ^a,b   Howe, Robert D ^a,b   Socrate, Simona ^c  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD MIT DIVISION OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL TISSUES; CERVICAL TISSUES; CONSTANT STRAIN RATE; CONSTITUTIVE MODELING; CONSTITUTIVE RELATIONSHIPS; CORTICAL TISSUES; CUSTOMIZABLE; ELASTIC ELEMENT; EX-VIVO; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FINITE-ELEMENT; HAPTIC TECHNOLOGY; LOAD DISPLACEMENTS; LOAD/UNLOAD; MODE OF DEFORMATION; MODEL PARAMETERS; MODELING APPROACH; MODELING FRAMEWORKS; MODELING METHODOLOGY; NON-LINEAR OPTIMIZATION; PHENOMENOLOGICAL MODELS; SINGLE-AXIS; SOFT TISSUE; STRESS RELAXATION TESTS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; TIME-DEPENDENT RESPONSE; TISSUE RESPONSE; UNCONFINED COMPRESSION;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; HISTOLOGY; OPTIMIZATION; RHEOLOGY; STRAIN RATE; TESTING; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

TISSUE;

ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN TISSUE; ELASTICITY; EX VIVO STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FLOW KINETICS; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LIVER PERFUSION; LOADING TEST; METHODOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PHENOMENOLOGY; PREDICTION; SOFT TISSUE; STRESS; TIME; VISCOSITY; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; LIVER; MECHANICAL STRESS; SWINE; UTERINE CERVIX;

SUS;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; CERVIX UTERI; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIVER; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RHEOLOGY; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SWINE; VISCOSITY;

EID: 79952593850     PISSN: 01480731     EISSN: 15288951     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1115/1.4003620     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ferry J. Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers 1970, Wiley, New York.
2. Fung Y.C. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues 1993, 2nd ed., Springer-Verlag, New York.
3. Ward I.M. Mechanical Properties of Solid Polymers 1983, Wiley, New York.
4. Chen E.J. Novakofski J. Jenkins W.K. O'Brien Jr. W.D. Young's Modulus Measurements of Soft Tissues With Application to Elasticity Imaging. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 1996, 43:191-194. ITUCER, 0885-3010, 10.1109/58.484478.
5. Kalanovic D. Ottensmeyer M.P. Gross J. Buess G. Dawson S.L. 2003, and MMVR.
6. Ottensmeyer M.P. In vivo Measurement of Solid Organ Visco-Elastic Properties. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2002, 85:328-333. ZZZZZZ, 0926-9630.
7. Bischoff J.E. Arruda E.M. Grosh K. Finite Element Modeling of Human Skin Using an Isotropic, Nonlinear Elastic Constitutive Model. J. Biomech. 2000, 33:645-652. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00018-X.
8. Brouwer I. Ustin J. Bentley L. Sherman A. Dhruv N. Tendick F. Measuring In Vivo Animal Soft Tissue Properties for Haptic Modeling in Surgical Simulation. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2001, 81:69-74. ZZZZZZ, 0926-9630.
9. Brown J.D. Rosen J. Kim Y.S. Chang L. Sinanan M.N. Hannaford B. In-Vivo and In-Situ Compressive Properties of Procine Abdominal Soft Tissues. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2003, 94:26-32. ZZZZZZ, 0926-9630.
10. Carter F.J. Frank T.G. Davies P.J. McLean D. Cuschieri A. Measurements and Modelling of the Compliance of Human and Porcine Organs. Med. Image Anal. 2001, 5:231-236. MIAECY, 1361-8415, 10.1016/S1361-8415(01)00048-2.
11. Davies P.J. Carter F.J. Cuschieri A. Mathematical Modelling for Keyhole Surgery Simulations: A Biomechanical Model for Spleen Tissue. IMA J. Appl. Math. 2002, 67:41-67. IJAMDM, 0272-4960, 10.1093/imamat/67.1.41.
12. Jordan P. Socrate S. Zickler T.,. Howe R. Constitutive Modeling of Porcine Liver in Indentation Using 3D Ultrasound Imaging. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2009, 2:192-201. ZZZZZZ, 1751-6161, 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2008.08.006.
13. Kauer M. Vuskovic V. Dual J. Szekely G. Bajka M. Inverse Finite Element Characterization of Soft Tissues. Med. Image Anal. 2002, 6:275-287. MIAECY, 1361-8415, 10.1016/S1361-8415(02)00085-3.
14. Kerdok A.E. Ottensmeyer M.P. Howe R.D. Effects of Perfusion on the Viscoelastic Characteristics of Liver. J. Biomech. 2006, 39:2221-2231. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.07.005.
15. Kerdok A.E. Characterizing the Nonlinear Mechanical Response of Liver to Surgical Manipulation. 2006, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
16. Kim J. Tay B. Stylopoulos N. Rattner D. Srinivasan M. Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention 2003, and Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.
17. Miller K. Constitutive Modelling of Abdominal Organs. J. Biomech. 2000, 33:367-373. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/S0021-9290(99)00196-7.
18. Nava A. Mazza E. Furrer M. Villiger P. Reinhart W.H. In Vivo Mechanical Characterization of Human Liver. Med. Image Anal. 2008, 12:203-216. MIAECY, 1361-8415, 10.1016/j.media.2007.10.001.
19. Rubin M.B. Bodner S.R. A Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Model for Dissipative Response of Soft Tissue. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2002, 39:5081-5099. IJSOAD, 0020-7683, 10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00237-8.
20. Socrate S. Boyce M.C. Proceedings of the ASME 2001 Bioengineering Conference 2001, 50:597-598. and Vol. pp.
21. Suh J.-K. Spilker R.L. Indentation Analysis of Biphasic Articular Cartilage: Nonlinear Phenomena Under Finite Deformation. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 1994, 116:1-9. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.2895700.
22. Febvay S. Socrate S. House M. ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE) 2003, and Washington, DC.
23. Hu T. Desai J.P. International Symposium on Medical Simulation 2004, 294. and Cambridge, MA, p.
24. Miller K. How to Test Very Soft Biological Tissues in Extension?. J. Biomech. 2001, 34:651-657. JBMCB5, 0021-9290, 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00236-0.
25. Myers K.M. Paskaleva A.P. House M. Socrate S. Mechanical and Biochemical Properties of Human Cervical Tissue. Acta Biomater. 2008, 4:104-116. ZZZZZZ, 1742-7061, 10.1016/j.actbio.2007.04.009.
26. Dokos S. LeGrice I.J. Smaill B.H. Kar J. Young A.A. A Triaxial-Measurement Shear-Test Device for Soft Biological Tissues. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2000, 122:471-478. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.1289624.
27. Liu Z. Bilston L.E. Large Deformation Shear Properties of Liver Tissue. Biorheology 2002, 39:735-742. BRHLAU, 0006-355X.
28. Valtorta D. Mazza E. Dynamic Measurement of Soft Tissue Viscoelastic Properties With a Torsional Resonator Device. Med. Image Anal. 2005, 9:481-490. MIAECY, 1361-8415, 10.1016/j.media.2005.05.002.
29. Nava A. Mazza E. Kleinermann F. Avis N.J. McClure J. Bajka M. Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Human Liver and Kidney Through Aspiration Experiments. Technol. Health Care 2004, 12:269-280. ZZZZZZ, 0928-7329.
30. Criscione J.C. Rivlin's Representation Formula Is Ill-Conceived for the Determination of Response Functions via Biaxial Testing. J. Elast. 2003, 70:129-147. JELSAY, 0374-3535, 10.1023/B:ELAS.0000005586.01024.95.
31. Ogden R.W. Saccomandi G. Sgura I. Fitting Hyperelastic Models to Experimental Data. Comput. Mech. 2004, 34:484-502. CMMEEE, 0178-7675, 10.1007/s00466-004-0593-y.
32. Johnson T.P. M. Socrate S. Boyce M.C. A Viscoelastic, Viscoplastic Model of Cortical Bone Valid at Low and High Strain Rates. Acta Biomater. 2010, 6:4073-4080. ZZZZZZ, 1742-7061, 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.017.
33. Prevost T.P. Balakrishnan A. Suresh S. Socrate S. Biomechanics of Brain Tissue. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7:83-95. ZZZZZZ, 1742-7061, 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.06.035.
34. Mazza E. Nava A. Hahnloser D. Jochum W. Bajka M. The Mechanical Response of Human Liver and Its Relation to Histology: An In Vivo Study. Med. Image Anal. 2007, 11:663-672. MIAECY, 1361-8415, 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.010.
35. Shampine L.F. Numerical Solution of Ordinary Differential Equations 1994, Chapman and Hall, New York.
36. Gasser T.C. Ogden R.W. Holzapfel G.A. Hyperelastic Modelling of Arterial Layers With Distributed Collagen Fibre Orientations. J. R. Soc., Interface 2006, 3:15-35. JRSICU, 1742-5689, 10.1098/rsif.2005.0073.
37. Bischoff J.E. Arruda E.M. Grosh K. A Rheological Network Model for the Continuum Anisotropic and Viscoelastic Behavior of Soft Tissue. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 2004, 3:56-65. BMMICD, 1617-7959, 10.1007/s10237-004-0049-4.
38. Arruda E.M. Boyce M.C. A Three-Dimensional Constitutive Model for the Large Stretch Behavior of Rubber Elastic Materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 1993, 41:389-412. JMPSA8, 0022-5096, 10.1016/0022-5096(93)90013-6.
39. Bergström J.S. Boyce M.C. Constitutive Modeling of the Time-Dependent and Cyclic Loading of Elastomers and Application to Soft Biological Tissues. Mech. Mater. 2001, 33:523-530. MSMSD3, 0167-6636, 10.1016/S0167-6636(01)00070-9.
40. Lagarias J.C. Reeds J.A. Wright M.H. Wright P.E. Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead Simplex Method in Low Dimensions. SIAM J. Optim. 1998, 9:112-147. SJOPE8, 1052-6234, 10.1137/S1052623496303470.
41. Jordan P. Image-Based Mechanical Characterization of Soft Tissue Using Three Dimensional Ultrasound. 2008, Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
42. Balakrishnan A. Development of Novel Dynamic Indentation Techniques for Soft Tissue Applications. 2007, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
43. Myers K.M. Socrate S. Paskaleva A. House M. ASME J. Biomech. Eng. 2010, 132:021003. JBENDY, 0148-0731, 10.1115/1.3197847.