Interlaboratory comparison of Porcine circovirus-2 indirect immunofluorescent antibody test and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay results on experimentally infected pigs

Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 206-212

  Patterson, Abby R ^a   Johnson, John K ^a   Ramamoorthy, Sheela ^a   Hesse, Richard A ^b   Murtaugh, Michael P ^c   Puvanendiran, Sumathy ^c   Pogranichniy, Roman M ^d   Erickson, Gene A ^e   Carman, Susy ^f   Hause, Ben ^g   Meng, Xiang Jin ^a   Opriessnig, Tanja ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e North Carolina Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^g Newport Laboratories   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparison; Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; Indirect fluorescent antibody test; Laboratory; Pigs; Porcine circovirus 2; Serology

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA; PORCINE CIRCOVIRUS 2; SUIDAE;

EID: 79952590875     PISSN: 10406387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104063871102300203     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Fachinger V, Bischoff R, Jedidia SB, et al.: 2008, The effect of vaccination against porcine circovirus type 2 in pigs suffering from porcine respiratory disease complex. Vaccine 26:1488-1499.
2. Fenaux M, Opriessnig T, Halbur PG, Meng XJ: 2003, Immunogenicity and pathogenicity of chimeric infectious DNA clones of pathogenic porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) and nonpathogenic PCV1 in weanling pigs. J Virol 77:11232-11243.
3. Fort M, Sibila M, Allepuz A, et al.: 2008, Porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) vaccination of conventional pigs prevents viremia against PCV2 isolates of different genotypes and geographic origins. Vaccine 26:1063-1071.
4. Gardner IA, Greiner M: 2006, Receiver-operating characteristic curves and likelihood ratios: improvements over traditional methods for the evaluation and application of veterinary clinical pathology tests. Vet Clin Pathol 35:8-17.
5. Hanley J, McNeil B: 1983, A method of comparing the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 148:839-843.
6. Harding J, Clark E: 1997, Recognizing and diagnosing postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome (PMWS). Swine Health Prod 5:201-203.
7. Horlen KP, Dritz SS, Nietfeld JC, et al.: 2008, A field evaluation of mortality rate and growth performance in pigs vaccinated against porcine circovirus type 2. J Am Vet Med Assoc 232:906-912.
8. Landis J, Koch G: 1977, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174.
9. Larochelle R, Magar R, D'Allaire S: 2003, Comparative serologic and virologic study of commercial swine herds with and without postweaning multisystemic wasting syndrome. Can J Vet Res 67:114-120.
10. Liu C, Ihara T, Nunoya T, Ueda S: 2004, Development of an ELISA based on the baculovirus-expressed capsid protein of porcine circovirus type 2 as antigen. J Vet Med Sci 66:237-242.
11. McNair I, Marshall M, McNeilly F, et al.: 2004, Interlaboratory testing of porcine sera for antibodies to porcine circovirus type 2. J Vet Diagn Invest 16:164-166.
12. Nawagitgul P, Harms PA, Morozov I, et al.: 2002, Modified indirect porcine circovirus (PCV) type 2-based and recombinant capsid protein (ORF2)-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for detection of antibodies to PCV. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 9:33-40.
13. Opriessnig T, Meng XJ, Halbur PG: 2007, Porcine circovirus type 2 associated disease: update on current terminology, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and intervention strategies. J Vet Diagn Invest 19:591-615.
14. Opriessnig T, Patterson AR, Elsener J, et al.: 2008, Influence of maternal antibodies on efficacy of porcine circovirus type 2 (PCV2) vaccination to protect pigs from experimental infection with PCV2. Clin Vaccine Immunol 15:397-401.
15. Patterson AR, Johnson J, Ramamoorthy S, et al.: 2008, Comparison of three enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to detect porcine circovirus-2 (PCV-2)-specific antibodies after vaccination or inoculation of pigs with distinct PCV-1 or PCV-2 isolates 2. J Vet Diagn Invest 20:744-751.
16. Pogranichnyy RM, Yoon KJ, Harms PA, et al.: 2000, Characterization of immune response of young pigs to porcine circovirus type 2 infection. Viral Immunol 13:143-153.
17. Shang SB, Li YF, Guo JQ, et al.: 2007, Development and validation of a recombinant capsid protein-based ELISA for detection of antibody to porcine circovirus type 2. Res Vet Sci 84:150-157.
18. Sim J, Wright C: 2005, The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther 85:257-268.
19. Tischer I, Gelderblom H, Vettermann W, Koch MA: 1982, A very small porcine virus with circular single-stranded DNA. Nature 295:64-66.
20. Wu P-C, Chein M-S, Tseng Y-Y, et al.: 2008, Expression of the porcine circovirus type 2 capsid protein subunits and application to an indirect ELISA. J Biotechnol 133:58-64.
21. Yolken RH, Viscidi R: 1989, Enzyme immunoassay and radioimmunoassay, In: Diagnostic procedures for viral, rickettsial and chlamydial infections, ed. Schmidt NJ, Emmons RW, 6th ed., pp. 157-178. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.
22. Zweig M, Campbell G: 1993, Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem 39:562-557.