On the comparison of the accuracies of optical tracking and EMTS modalities of surgical navigators

2010 5th Cairo International Biomedical Engineering Conference, CIBEC 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 29-32

  Koivukangas, Tapani ^a   Katisko, Jani P A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION POINTS; COMPARISON ANALYSIS; ELECTROMAGNETIC TRACKING SYSTEMS; FINLAND; OPERATING AREA; OPERATING RANGES; OPTICAL TRACKING; REAL-WORLD; TRACKING SYSTEM;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; HOSPITALS; NAVIGATION; SURGERY;

TRACKING (POSITION);

EID: 79952563671     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CIBEC.2010.5716067     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (4)

1. Koivukangas T. et.al. Development of an Accuracy Assessment Phantom for Surgical Navigators. 2009. Proceedings of the 31st Annual international Conference IEEE Engineering in Medicine. September, 2 - 6, 2009. Minnesota, USA, 1517-1520.
2. Hummel J., Figl M., Birkfellner W., Bax M. R., Shahidi R., Maurer Jr C.R. and Bergmann H. Evaluation of a New Electromagnetic Tracking System Using a Standardized Assessment Protocol. Physics in Medicine and Biology 51 (2006) N205-N210.
3. Wiles A. D., Thompson D. G., and Frantz D. D. (2004). Accuracy Assessment and Interpretation for Optical Tracking Systems. Medical Imaging 2004 Proc. 5367. Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures and Display. 2004.
4. Katisko Jani P.A. and Koivukangas John P. Optically Neuronavigated Ultrasonography in an Intraoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Environment. Neurosurgery 60:373-381, 2007.