Field-measured performance evaluation of a digital daylighting system

LEUKOS - Journal of Illuminating Engineering Society of North America

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 85-101

  Granderson, Jessica ^d   Gaddam, Vasanth ^b   DiBartolomeo, Dennis ^a   Li, Xiaolei ^c   Rubinstein, Francis ^a   Das, Sushanta ^b  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

^c SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Commissioning; DALI; Dimming; Energy savings; Lighting controls; Performance assessment; User experience

Indexed keywords

COMMISSIONING; DALI; DIMMING; ENERGY SAVINGS; LIGHTING CONTROLS; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; USER EXPERIENCE;

DAYLIGHTING; INSTALLATION; RATING; RETROFITTING; SENSORS;

ENERGY CONSERVATION;

EID: 79952559436     PISSN: 15502724     EISSN: 15502716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1582/LEUKOS.2010.07.02002     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Boyce P, Veitch J, Newsham G. 2006. Lighting quality and office work: Two field simulation experiments. Lighting Research and Technology 38(3):191-223. (Pubitemid 44317299)
2. Rubinstein F, Bolotov D, Levi M, Powell K, Schwartz P. 2008. The Advantages of highly controlled lighting for offices and commercial buildings. Proceedings of the 2008 ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings. LBNL-2514E, August 2008.
3. Von Neida B, Manicccia D, Tweed A. 2001. An analysis of the energy and cost savings potential of occupancy sensors for commercial lighting systems. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 30(2):111-125.
4. Jennings J, Rubinstein F, DiBartolomeo D, Blanc S. 2000. Comparison of control options in private offices in an advanced lighting controls testbed. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 29(2):39-60.
5. Galasiu A, Newsham G, Suvagau C, Sander D. 2007. Energy saving lighting control systems for open-plan offices: A field study. Leukos 4(1):7-29.
6. Li D, Lam T, Wong S. 2006. Lighting and energy performance for an office using high frequency dimming controls. Energy Conversion and Management 47(9-10):1133-1145. (Pubitemid 43220106)
7. Bodart M, De Herde A. 2002. Global energy savings in offices buildings by the use of daylighting. Energy and Buildings 34:421-429. (Pubitemid 34105451)
8. Roche L, Dewey E, Littlefair P. 2000. Occupant reactions to daylight in offices. Lighting Research and Technology 32(3):119-126.
9. Newsham G, Aries M, Mancini S, Faye G. 2008. Individual control of electric lighting in a daylit space. Lighting Research and Technology 40(1):25-41. (Pubitemid 351577472)
10. Moore T, Carter D, Slater A. 2002. User attitudes toward occupant controlled office lighting. Lighting Research and Technology 34(3):207-216. (Pubitemid 34993279)
11. Heschong Mahone Group, Inc. 2006. Sidelighting photocontrols field study. Prepared for the Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance Report #06-152. Available from: http://www.nwalliance.org/research/reports/152.pdf. Accessed March 2010.
12. Bierman A, Conway K. 1999. Characterizing daylight photosensor system performance to help overcome market barriers. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America Conference Proceedings: 413-432.
13. th European Conference on Energy-Efficient Lighting 2:245-254.
14. st Century: 279-283.
15. Figueiro, MG. 2004. Occupancy Sensors: Are there reliable estimates of the energy savings? LD+A Lighting Design + Application, January 2004.
16. Doulos L, Tsangrassoulis A, Topalis F. 2008. The role of spectral response of photosensors in daylight responsive systems. Energy and Buildings 40(4):588-599. (Pubitemid 350296696)
17. Renesslaer Polytechnic Institute, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and Lighting Research Center. 2004. Photosensor tutorial. Available from: http://www.lightingresearch.org/programs/nlpip/tutorials/photosensors/. Accessed March 2010.