The relationship between hypnotizability, internal imagery, and efficiency of neurolinguistic programming

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 225-241

  Kirenskaya, Anna V ^a   Novototsky Vlasov, Vladimir Y ^a   Chistyakov, Andrey N ^a   Zvonikov, Vyacheslav M ^b  

^a Serbsky National Research Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry   (Russian Federation)

^b Moscow Humanitarian University   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTONOMIC NERVOUS SYSTEM; EMOTION; EXPERIMENT; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPNOSIS; IMAGERY; LEARNING; LIFE EVENT; MALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SKIN CONDUCTANCE; WAKEFULNESS;

ADULT; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; IMAGINATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952558326     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: 17445183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2011.546223     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Baumgartner, T., Esslen, M., & Jäncke, L. (2006). From emotion perception to emotion experience: Emotions evoked by pictures and classical music. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 34-43.
2. Carretié, L., Mercado, F., Tapia, M., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2001). Emotion, attention, and the "negativity bias, " studied through event-related potentials. International Journal ofPsychophysiology, 41, 75-85. (Pubitemid 32178163)
3. Cole, H. W., & Ray, W. J. (1985). EEG correlates of emotional tasks related to attentional demands. International Journal ofPsychophysiology, 3(1), 33-41. (Pubitemid 15018951)
4. Crawford, H. J. (1990). Cognitive and psychophysiological correlates of hypnotic responsiveness and hypnosis. In M. L. Fass & D. P. Brown (Eds.), Creative mastery in hypnosis and hypnoanalysis: A festschrift for E. Fromm. New York, NY: Plenum.
5. Crawford, H. J., & Allen, S. N. (1982). Group Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C, Unpublished manual. Laramie, WY: University of Wyoming.
6. Crawford, H. J., Brown, A. M., & Moon, C. E. (1993). Sustained attentional and disattentional abilities: Differences between low and highly hypnotizable persons. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 534-543. (Pubitemid 23333491)
7. Crawford, H. J., Clarke, S. W., & Kitner-Triolo, M. (1996). Self-generated happy and sad emotions in low and highly hypnotizable persons during waking and hypnosis: Laterality and regional EEG activity differences. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 24, 239-266. (Pubitemid 27023142)
8. Crawford, H. J., Kapelis, L., & Harrison, D. W. (1995). Visual field asymmetry in facial affect perception: Moderating effects of hypnosis, hypnotic susceptibility level, absorption, and sustained attentional abilities. International Journal Neuroscience, 82, 11-23.
9. Crawford, H. J., Wallace, B., Nomura, K., & Slater, H. (1986). Eidetic-like imagery in hypnosis: Rare but there. American Journal ofPsychology, 99, 527-546.
10. Croft, R. J., Williams, J. D., Haenschel, C., & Gruzelier, J. (2002). Pain perception, hypnosis and 40 Hz oscillations. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 46, 101-108. (Pubitemid 35300495)
11. Crowson, J. J., Jr., Conroy, A. M., & Chester, T. D. (1991). Hypnotizability as related to visually induced affective reactivity. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 39, 140-144.
12. Danker, J. F., & Anderson, J. R. (2010). The ghosts of brain states past: Remembering reactivates the brain regions engaged during encoding. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 87-102.
13. Davidson, R. J. (2004). Well-being and affective style: Neural substrates and biobehavioural correlates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359, 1395-1411. (Pubitemid 39275378)
14. Davidson, R. J., Jackson, D. C., & Kalin, N. H. (2000). Emotion, plasticity context, and regulation: Perspectives from affective neuroscience. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 890-909.
15. Grinder, J., & Bandler, R. (1979). Frogs into princes: Neuro linguistic programming. Moab, UT: Real People Press.
16. Gruzelier, J. (1998). A working model of the neurophysiology of hypnosis: A review of the evidence. Contemporary Hypnosis, 15, 3-21. (Pubitemid 128353488)
17. Gruzelier, J. (2000). Redefining hypnosis: Theory methods and integration. Contemporary Hypnosis, 17, 21-70.
18. Kumar, V. K., Pekala, R. J., & Cummings, J. (1996). Trait factors, state effects, and hypnotizability International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 44, 232-249. (Pubitemid 26265553)
19. Lichtenberg, P., Bachner-Melman, R., Ebstein, R. P., & Crawford, J. (2004). Hypnotic sus-ceptibility: Multidimensional relationships with Cloninger 's tridimensional personal-ity questionnaire, COMT polymorphisms, absorption and attentional characteristics. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 52, 47-72. (Pubitemid 38116728)
20. Piccione, C., Hilgard, E., & Zimbardo, P. (1989). On the degree of stability of measured hypnotizability over a 25-year period. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 289-295.
21. Schaefer, S. M., Jackson, D. C., Davidson, R. J., Aguirre, G. K., Kimberg, D. Y. & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2002). Modulation of amygdalar activity by the conscious regulation ofnegative emotion. Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience, 14, 913-921.
22. Terry, M. E. (1952). Some rank order tests which are most powerful against specific alternatives. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 23, 346-366.