Analysis of anisotropic viscoelastoplastic properties of cortical bone tissues

Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 807-820

  Abdel Wahab, Adel A ^a   Alam, Khurshid ^b   Silberschmidt, Vadim V ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Cortical bone; Creep; DMA; Loss modulus; Relaxation; Storage modulus; Viscoelasticity

Indexed keywords

CORTICAL BONE; DMA; LOSS MODULUS; RELAXATION; STORAGE MODULUS;

ANISOTROPY; CREEP; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC MECHANICAL ANALYSIS; ELASTIC MODULI; ELASTICITY; ELASTOPLASTICITY; ENERGY DISSIPATION; FRACTURE; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; STRAIN RATE; TENSILE TESTING; UNLOADING; VISCOELASTICITY; VISCOSITY;

BONE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BONE DEFORMATION; BONE STRESS; BONE TISSUE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISCOELASTICITY; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; ANISOTROPY; BIOMECHANICS; CATTLE; ELASTICITY; FEMUR; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; MATERIALS TESTING; STRESS, MECHANICAL; VISCOSITY;

EID: 79952549295     PISSN: 17516161     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abaqus, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., 2009. Providence, RI, USA, Theory manual -Version 6.9-1.
2. Augat P., Schorlemmer S. The role of cortical bone and its microstructure in bone strength. Age and Ageing 2006, 35(S2):ii27-ii31.
3. Bonfield W., O'connor P. Anelastic deformation and the friction stress of bone. J. Math. Sci. 1978, 13:202-207.
4. Bonfield W., Tully A.E. Ultrasonic analysis of the Young's modulus of cortical bone. J. Biomed. Eng. 1982, 4:23-27.
5. Burstein A.H., Currey J.D., Frankel Y.H., Reilly D.T. The ultimate properties of bone tissue: the effects of yielding. J. Biomech. 1972, 5:34-44.
6. Burstein A.H., Reilly D.T., Martens M. Aging of bone tissue: mechanical properties. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1976, 58-A:82-86.
7. Cotton J.R., Winwood K., Zioupos P., Taylor M. Damage rate is a predictor of fatigue life and creep strain rate in tensile fatigue of human cortical bone samples. Trans ASME. J. Biomech. Eng. 2005, 127(2):213-219.
8. Currey J.D. Tensile yield in compact bone is determined by strain, post yield behaviour by mineral content. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:549-556.
9. Currey J.D. Differences in the tensile strength of bone of different histological types. J. Anat. 1959, 93:87-95.
10. Currey J.D. The effect of strain rate, reconstruction and mineral content on some mechanical properties of bones. J. Biomech. 1975, 8:81-86.
11. Currey J.D. Anelasticity in bone and echinoderm skeletons. J. Exp. Biol. 1965, 43:279-292.
12. Espinoza Orías A.A., Deuerling J.M., Landrigan M.D., Renaud J.E., Roeder R.K. Anatomic variation in the elastic anisotropy of cortical bone tissue in the human femur. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2009, 2:255-263.
13. Evans, F.G., 1973. Mechanical properties of bone. Springfield, I1: Charles C. Thomas.
14. Evans F.G., Bang S. Physical and histological differences between human fibular and femoral compact bone. Studies on the Anatomy and Function of Bone and Joints 1966, 142-155. Springer, Berlin. F.G. Evans (Ed.).
15. Ferreira F., Vaz M.A., SimÕes J.A. Mechanical properties of bovine cortical bone at high-strain rate. Mater. Charact. 2005, 57:71-79.
16. Fondrk M., Bahniuk E., Davy D.T., Michales C. Some viscoelastic characteristics of bovine bone and human bone. J. Biomech. 1988, 21(8):623-630.
17. Garner E., Lakes R., Lee T., Swan C., Brand R. Viscoelastic dissipation in compact bone: implications for stress-induced fluid flow in bone. Trans ASME. J. Biomech. Eng. 2000, 122:166-172.
18. Johnson T.P.M., Socrate S., Boyce M.C. A viscoelastic, viscoplastic model of cortical bone valid at low and high strain rates. Acta Biomater 2010, 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.04.017.
19. Katz J.L. Anisotropy of Young's modulus of bone. Nature 1980, 283:106-107.
20. Kennedy O.D., Brennan O., Mauer P., Rackard S.M., O'Brien F.J., Taylor D., Lee T.C. The effects of increased intracortical remodeling on microcrack behaviour in compact bone. Bone 2008, 43:889-893.
21. Kulin R.M., Jiang F., Vecchio K.S. Effects of age and loading rate on equine cortical bone failure. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2010, 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.09.006.
22. Lakes R. Viscoelastic properties of cortical bone. Bone Mechanics Handbook 2001, 11-1-11-5. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. 2nd ed. S.C. Cowin (Ed.).
23. Lakes R.S., Katz J.L. Viscoelastic properties of wet cortical bone: part II, relaxation mechanisms. J. Biomech. 1979, 12:679-687.
24. Lakes R.S., Katz J.L. Viscoelastic properties of wet cortical bone: part III, A non-linear constitutive equation. J. Biomech. 1979, 12:689-698.
25. Lakes R.S., Katz J.L., Sternstein S.S. Viseoelastic properties of wet cortical bone-1, Torsional and biaxial studies. J. Biomech. 1979, 12:657-678.
26. Lakes R.S., Saha S. Cement line motion in bone. Science 1979, 204:501-503.
27. Lasaygues P., Pithioux M. Ultrasonic characterization of orthotropic elastic bovine bones. Ultrasonics 2002, 39:567-573.
28. Mano J.o.F. Viscoelastic properties of bone: mechanical spectroscopy studies on a chicken model. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2005, C25:145-152.
29. Mohsin S., O'Brien F.J., Lee T.C. Osteonal crack barriers in ovine compact bone. J. Anat. 2006, 208:81-89.
30. O'Brien F.J., Taylor D., Lee T.C. The effect of bone microstructure on the initiation and growth of microcracks. J. Orthop. Res. 2005, 23:475-480.
31. Parsamian, G., Norman, T., 2000. A viscoelastic damage model for human cortical bone. 48th Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society, Poster No: 0546, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
32. PASW Statistics. 2009. W. b. P. E. a. C.
33. Paul I.L., Munro M.B., Abernethy P.J., Simon S.R., Radin E.L., Rose R.M. Musculoskeletal shock absorption: relative contribution of bone and soft tissues at various frequencies. J. Biomech. 1978, 11:237-239.
34. Pithioux M., Lasaygues P., Chabrand P. An alternative ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic properties of cortical bone. J. Biomech. 2002, 35:961-968.
35. Raftopoulos D., Katsamanis E., Saul F., Liu W., Saddemi S. An intermediate loading rate technique for the determination of mechanical properties of human femoral cortical bone. J. Biomed. Eng. 1993, 15:60-66.
36. Reilly D.T., Burstein A.H. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J. Biomech. 1975, 8:393-405.
37. Rho J.Y. An ultrasonic method for measuring the elastic properties of human tibia1 cortical and cancellous bone. Ultrasonics 1996, 34:777-783.
38. Rho J.Y., Kuhn-Spearing L., Zioupos P. Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Med. Eng. Phys. 1998, 20(2):92-102.
39. Saha, S., 1973. Tensile impact properties of bone and their relationship to microstructure. Ph D thesis, Stanford University.
40. Saha S., Hayes W.C. Instrumented tensile-impact tests of bone. Exp. Mech. 1974, 473-478.
41. Saha S., Hayes W.C. Relationship between tensile impact properties and microstructure of compact bone. Calcif. Tiss. Res. 1977, 24:65-72.
42. Sasaki N., Atsushi E. Viscoelastic properties of bone as a function of water content. J. Biomech. 1995, 28:809-815.
43. Sasaki N., Nakayama Y., Yoshikawa M., Enyo A. Stress relaxation function of bone and bone collagen. J. Biomech. 1993, 26:1369-1376.
44. Sedlin E.D. A rheological model for cortical bone. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1965, 83(Suppl.):77.
45. Sevostianov I., Kachanov M. Impact of the porous microstructure on the overall elastic properties of the osteonal cortical bone. J. Biomech. 2000, 33:881-888.
46. Smith J.W., Walmsley R. Elastic after-effect, plasticity and fatigue in bone. J. Anat. 1957, 91:603-604.
47. Sweeney, W., Kroon, R.P., Byersr, K., 1965. Mechanical characteristics of bone and its constituents. ASME 65-WA/HUF-7.
48. Uteri'kin A.A., Sveshnikova A.A. Effect of duration of loading on the deformation properties of compact bone material. Arkh. Anatom. Gistologii, i Embriologii 1973, 64(4):14-20.
49. Vashishth D., Tanner K.E., Bonfield W. Contribution, development and morphology of microcracking in cortical bone during crack propagation. J. Biomech. 2000, 33(9):1169-1174.
50. Vilks, Y.V., Kent-s, I.V., 1975. Creep of compact human bony tissue under tension. Institute of Polymer Mechanics, Academy of Sciences of the Latvian SSR, Riga. Translated from Mekhanika Polimerov 4, pp. 634-638.
51. Wachter N.J., Krischak G.D., Mentzel M., Sarkar M.R., Ebinger T., Kinzl L., Claes L., Augat P. Correlation of bone mineral density with strength and microstructural parameters of cortical bone in vitro. Bone 2002, 31:90-95.
52. Wang T., Freng Z. Dynamic mechanical properties of cortical bone: the effect of mineral content. Mater. Lett. 2005, 59:2277-2280.
53. Wolff J. The Law of Bone Remodeling 1986, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, Translation of the German 1892 edition.
54. Wood J.L. Dynamic response of human cranial bone. J. Biomech. 1971, 4(1):1-12.
55. Wrightt T.M., Hayes W.C. Tensile testing of bone over a wide range of strain rates: effects of strain rate, microstructure and density. Med. Biol. Eng. 1976, 671-680.
56. Yamashita J., Furman B.R., Rawls H.R., Wang X.D., Agrawal C.M. The use of Dynamic Mechanical Analysis to assess the viscoelastic properties of human cortical bone. J. Biomed. Res. Appl. Biomater. 2001, 58(1):47-53.
57. Yeni Y.N., Christopherson G.T., Turner A.S., Les C.M., Fyhrie D.P. Apparent viscoelastic anisotropy as measured from non-destructive oscillatory tests can reflect the presence of a flaw in cortical bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2004, 69A:124-130.
58. Yoon H.S., Katz J.L. Ultrasonic wave propagation in human cortical bone I. Theoretical considerations for hexagonal symmetry. J. Biomech. 1976, 9:407-412.
59. Zioupos P., Currey J.D. Changes in the stiffness, strength, and toughness of human cortical bone with age. Bone 1998, 22:57-66.
60. Zioupos P., Currey J.D., Hamer A.J. The role of collagen in the declining mechanical properties of aging human cortical bone. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1999, 45:108-116.