A clinical protocol for predicting outcomes with an implantable prosthetic device (baha) in patients with single-sided deafness

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 21, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 654-662

  Snapp, Hillary A ^a   Fabry, David A ^b   Telischi, Fred F ^a   Arheart, Kristopher L ^c   Angeli, Simon I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Audio Sync Hearing Technologies   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

Baha; Bone anchored; QuickSIN; Single sided deafness; Speech in noise; Unilateral hearing loss

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF REPORT; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; UNILATERAL HEARING LOSS; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTIFACTS; AUDIOMETRY, SPEECH; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS, UNILATERAL; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952541408     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.21.10.5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bland JM, Altman DG. (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307-310. (Pubitemid 16134762)
2. Bosman AJ, Hol MK, Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW. (2003) Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness. Acta Otolaryngol 123(2):258-260. (Pubitemid 36359803)
3. Carlsson P, Hakansson B, Ringdahl A. (1995) Force threshold for hearing by direct bone conduction. J Acoust Soc Am 97(2):1124-1129.
4. Cox RM. (2003) Assessment of subjective outcome of hearing aid fitting: getting the client's point of view. Int J Audiol 42:S90-S96.
5. Cox RM. (2005) Evidence-based practice as a provision of amplification. J Am Acad Audiol 16(7):419-438.
6. Donaldson JA, Selters WA. (1962) A speech-in-noise test to evaluate unilateral hearing loss. Laryngoscope 72:145-155.
7. Etymotic Research. (2001) Quick Speech-in-Noise Test. Elk Grove Village, IL: Etymotic Research.
8. Giolas T, Wark D. (1967) Communication problems associated with unilateral hearing loss. J Speech Hear Disord 32(4):336-343.
9. Hawkins D. (2004) Limitations and uses of the aided audiogram Semin Hear. 25(1):51-62.
10. Hol MK, Bosman AJ, Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW. (2005) Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: an evaluation of audiometric and patient outcome measurements. Otol Neurotol 26(5):999-1006. (Pubitemid 41330718)
11. Killion MC, Niquette PA. (2000) What can the pure-tone audiogram tell us about a patient's SNR loss? Hear J 53:46-53.
12. Killion MC, Niquette PA, Gudmundsen GI, Revit LJ, Banerjee S. (2004) Development of a quick speech-in-noise test for measuring signal-to-noise ratio loss in normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 116(4):2395-2405. (Pubitemid 39391641)
13. Lin LM, Bowditch S, Anderson MJ, May B, Cox KM, Niparko JK. (2006) Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech-in-noise and directional hearing effects with bone anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification. Otol Neurotol 27(2):172-182.
14. Niparko JK, Cox KM, Lustig LR. (2003) Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification rehabilitation of unilateral deafness. Otol Neurotol 24:73-78. (Pubitemid 36169368)
15. Palmer CV, Mueller HG. (2001) Selection and fitting of hearing aids. In: McCarthy P, Alpiner J, eds. Handbook of Aural Rehabilitation. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.
16. Passing H, Bablok W. (1983) A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry. Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 21:709-720. (Pubitemid 14208512)
17. Sargent EW, Herrmann B, Hollenbeak CS, Bankaitis AE. (2001) The minimum speech test battery in profound unilateral hearing loss. Otol Neurotol 22:480-486. (Pubitemid 32661945)
18. Seewald RC, Hudson SP, Gagne J, Selisko DL. (1992) Comparison of two methods for estimating the sensation level of amplified speech. Ear Hear 13(3):142-149.
19. Seewald RC, Moodie KS, Sinclair ST, Cornelisse LE. (1996) Traditional and theoretical approaches to selecting amplification for infants and young children.In: Bess FH, Gravel JS, Tharpe AM, eds. Amplification for Children with Auditory Deficits. Nashville: Bill Wilkerson Press, 161-191.
20. Stenfelt S, Goode RL. (2005) Transmission properties of bone conducted sound: measurements in cadaver heads. J Acoust Soc Am 118(4):2373-2391. (Pubitemid 41463951)
21. Stenfelt SP, Hakansson BE. (1999) Sensitivity to bone-conducted sound: excitation of the mastoid vs. the teeth. Scand Audiol Suppl 28(3):190-198. (Pubitemid 29403387)
22. Taylor B. (2003) Speech-in noise tests: how and why to include them in your basic test battery. Hear J 56(1):40-43.
23. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). (2002) Section 2. Summary and Certification. 510(k) Summary Number K021837. www.fda.gov/medicalDevices.
24. Vaneecloo FM, Ruzza I, Hanson JN, et al. (2001) The monaural pseudo-stereophonic hearing aid (BAHA) in unilateral total deafness: a study of 29 patients. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol 122:343-350. (Pubitemid 34595990)
25. Wazen J, Ghossaini S, Spitzer J, Kuller M. (2005) Localization by unilateral Baha users. Otol Head Neck Surg 132(6):928-932. (Pubitemid 40798418)
26. Wilson RH, McArdle R, Smith SL. (2007) An evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res 50:844-856. (Pubitemid 350058563)