Three Rs approaches in the production and quality control of fish vaccines

Biologicals

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 117-128

  Midtlyng, Paul J ^a,f   Hendriksen, Coenraad ^b   Balks, Elisabeth ^c   Bruckner, Lukas ^d   Elsken, Lawrence ^e   Evensen, Øystein ^f   Fyrand, Kjetil ^g   Guy, Allison ^h   Halder, Marlies ⁱ   Hawkins, Penny ^j   Kisen, Gunn ^k   Romstad, Anne Berit ^l   Salonius, Kira ^m   Smith, Patrick ⁿ   Sneddon, Lynne U ^o  

^a VESO   (Norway)

^b NETHERLANDS VACCINE INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

^c PAUL EHRLICH INSTITUT   (Germany)

^d Institut fr Viruskrankheiten und Immunprophylaxe   (Switzerland)

^e UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

^f NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^g ZOETIS   (United States)

^h Canadian Council on Animal Care   (Canada)

ⁱ JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^j Research Animals Department   (United Kingdom)

^k Norwegian Medicines Agency   (Norway)

^l NORD UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

^m Aqua Health Business   (Canada)

ⁿ Aquaculture Centre   (United Kingdom)

^o UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Efficacy; Fish vaccines; Licensing; Potency; Quality control; Reduction; Refinement; Replacement; Safety

Indexed keywords

FISH VACCINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VACCINE;

ANIMAL TESTING REDUCTION; ANIMAL TESTING REFINEMENT; ANIMAL TESTING REPLACEMENT; ANIMAL WELFARE; ANTIBODY RESPONSE; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONSCIOUSNESS; DRUG POTENCY; DRUG QUALITY; DRUG SCREENING; EFFECTOR CELL; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IMMUNOCHEMISTRY; LICENSING; NONHUMAN; PAIN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; SEROLOGY; VACCINATION; VACCINE PRODUCTION;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 79952537225     PISSN: 10451056     EISSN: 10958320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2011.02.001     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (77)

1. Russell W.M.S., Burch R.L. The principles of humane experimental technique 1959, Methuen, London, Reprinted by UFAW, 1992.
2. Annual report 2008, Norwegian Animal Research Authority, [accessed 18. 11. 10]. http://www.fdu.no/fdu/.
3. Koppang E.O., Fischer U., Satoh M., Jirillo E. Inflammation in fish as seen from a morphological point of view with special reference to the vascular compartment. Curr Pharm Des 2007, 13:3649-3655.
4. Press C.M., Evensen Ø The morphology of the immune system in teleost fishes. Fish Shellfish Immunol 1999, 9:309-318.
5. Fletcher TC, Secombes CJ, Immunology of fish, In: Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons - online library, [accessed 18. 11. 10]. doi:10.1038/npg.els.0000520.
6. Meseguer J., Lopez-Ruiz A., Garcia-Ayala A. Reticuloendothelial stroma of the head-kidney from the seawater teleost gilthead seabream (Sparus-Aurata L) - an ultrastructural and cytochemical study. Anat Rec 1995, 241:303-309.
7. Kaattari S.L., Irwin M.J. Salmonid spleen and anterior kidney harbor populations of lymphocytes with different B-cell repertoires. Dev Comp Immunol 1985, 9:433-444.
8. Reite O.B. Comparative physiology of histamine. Physiol Rev 1972, 52:778-819.
9. Reite O.B., Evensen Ø Mast cells in the swimbladder of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar: histochemisty and responses to compound 48/80 and formalin-inactivated Aeromonas salmonicida. Dis Aquat Org 1994, 20:95-100.
10. Magnadottir B. Innate immunity of fish (overview). Fish Shellfish Immunol 2006, 20:137-151.
11. Lukacs M.F., Harstad H., Grimholt U., Beetz-Sargent M., Cooper G.A., Reid L., et al. Genomic organization of duplicated major histocompatibility complex class I regions in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). BMC Genomics 2007, 8:251.
12. Bengten E., Clem L.W., Miller N.W., Warr G.W., Wilson M. Channel catfish immunoglobulins: repertoire and expression. Dev Comp Immunol 2006, 30:77-92.
13. Hansen J.D., Landis E.D., Phillips R.B. Discovery of a unique Ig heavy-chain isotype (IgT) in rainbow trout: implications for a distinctive B cell developmental pathway in teleost fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:6919-6924.
14. Hordvik I., Thevarajan J., Samdal I., Bastani N., Krossoy B. Molecular cloning and phylogenetic analysis of the Atlantic salmon immunoglobulin D gene. Scand J Immunol 1999, 50:202-210.
15. Li J., Barreda D.R., Zhang Y.A., Boshra H., Gelman A.E., Lapatra S., et al. B lymphocytes from early vertebrates have potent phagocytic and microbicidal abilities. Nat Immunol 2006, 7:1116-1124.
16. Pilstrøm L. Adaptive immunity in teleosts: humoral immunity. Dev Biol 2005, 121:23. Basel.
17. Secombes C.J., Bird S., Zou J. Adaptive immunity in teleosts: cellular immunity. Dev Biol 2005, 121:25-32. Basel.
18. Somamoto T., Okamoto N., Nakanishi T., Ototake M., Nakao M. In vitro generation of viral-antigen dependent cytotoxic T-cells from ginbuna crucian carp, Carassius auratus langsdorfii. Virology 2009, 389:26-33.
19. Utke K., Bergmann S., Lorenzen N., Köllner B., Ototake M., Fischer U. Cell-mediated cytotoxicity in rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, infected with viral haemorrhagic septicaemia virus. Fish Shellfish Immunol 2007, 22:182-196.
20. Boudinot P., Boubekeur S. A.Benmansour, Rhabdovirus infection induces public and private T cell responses in teleost fish. J Immunol 2001, 167:6202-6209.
21. Sneddon L.U. Ethics and welfare; pain perception in fish. Bull Eur Assoc Fish Path 2006, 26:6-10.
22. Pain terms: a list with definitions and notes on usage. Pain 1979, 6:249-252. International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP).
23. Sneddon L.U. Anatomical and electrophysiological analysis of the trigeminal nerve in the rainbow trout Onchorhynchus mykiss. Neurosci Lett 2002, 39:67-171.
24. Sneddon L.U. Trigeminal somatosensory innervation of the head of the rainbow trout with particular reference to nociception. Brain Res 2003, 972:44-52.
25. Sneddon L.U. Evolution of nociception in vertebrates: comparative analysis of lower vertebrates. Brain Res Rev 2004, 46:123-130.
26. Sneddon L.U., Braithwaite V.A., Gentle M.J. Do fish have nociceptors? Evidence for the evolution of a vertebrate sensory system. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 2003, 270:1115-1121.
27. Ashley P.J., Sneddon L.U., McCrohan C.R. Properties of corneal receptors in a teleost fish. Neurosci Lett 2006, 410:165-168.
28. Ashley P.J., Sneddon L.U., McCrohan C.R. Nociception in fish: stimulus-response properties of receptors on the head of trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. Brain Res 2007, 1166:47-54.
29. Dunlop R., Laming P. Mechanoreceptive and nociceptive responses in the central nervous system of goldfish (Carassius auratus) and trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). J Pain 2006, 6:551-568.
30. Reilly S.C., Quinn J.P., Cossins A.R., Sneddon L.U. Behavioural analysis of a nociceptive event in fish: comparisons between three species demonstrate specific responses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2008, 114:248-259.
31. Sneddon L.U. The evidence for pain in fish; the use of morphine as an analgesic. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003, 83:153-162.
32. Ehrensing R.H., Michell G.F., Kastin A.J. Similar antagonism of morphine analgesia by MIF-1 and naxolone in Carassius auratus. Pharm Biochem Behav 1982, 17:757-761.
33. Sneddon L.U., Braithwaite V.A., Gentle M.J. Novel object test, Examining nociception and fear in the rainbow trout. J Pain 2003, 4:431-440.
34. Ashley P.J., Ringrose S., Edwards K.L., Wallington E., McCrohan C.R., Sneddon L.U. Effect of noxious stimulation upon anti-predator responses and dominance status in rainbow trout. Anim Behav 2009, 77:403-410.
35. Clayton N.S., Dickinson A. What, where and when: episodic-like memory during cache recovery by scrub jays. Nature 1998, 395:272-274.
36. Morris R.G. Episodic-like memory in animals: psychological criteria, neural mechanisms and the value of episodic-like tasks to investigate animal models of neurodegenerative disease. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2001, 356:1453-1465.
37. Reiss D., Marino L. Mirror self-recognition in the bottlenose dolphin: a case of cognitive convergence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98:5937-5942.
38. Smith J., Shields W., Washburn D. The comparative psychology of uncertainty monitoring and metacognition. Behav Brain Sci 2003, 26:317-373.
39. Wynne C. Do animals think? 2004, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
40. Hendriksen C., Arciniega J.L., Bruckner L., Chevalier M., Coppens E., Descamps J., et al. The consistency approach for the quality control of vaccines. Biologicals 2008, 36:73-77.
41. Veterinary services memorandum 800.90. Guidelines for veterinary biological relative potency assays and reference preparations based on ELISA antigen quantification 1998, United States Department of Agriculture, [accessed 18. 11. 10]. http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/vet_biologics/publications/memo_800_90.pdf.
42. 5.3. Statistical analysis of results of biological assays and tests 2008, Council of Europe, European Pharmacopoeia. 6th ed.
43. VICH Topic GL2: validation of analytical procedures: methodology (CVMP/VICH/591/98) 1998, VICH, [accessed 18. 11. 10]. http://www.vichsec.org/pdf/gl02_st7.pdf.
44. Directive 2001/82/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to veterinary medicinal products. Off J Eur Union 2001, L311:1-66. European Commission.
45. European Commission. The Rules Governing Medicinal Products in the European Union-EudraLex Volume 7B: Specific requirements for the production and control of live and inactivated vaccines intended for fish-7blm9a [accessed 18. 11. 10]. http://ec.europa.eu/health/files/eudralex/vol-7/b/7blm9a_en.pdf.
46. VICH GL 44-Target animal safety for veterinary live and inactivated vaccines (EMEA/CVMP/VICH/359665/2005) 2008, VICH, [accessed 18. 11. 10]. http://www.vichsec.org/pdf/0708/GL44-st7.doc.
47. Vaccines for veterinary use, monograph no 62 2008, Council of Europe, European Pharmacopoeia. 6th ed.
48. Cvmp-position paper on data requirements for removing the target animal batch safety test for immunological veterinary medicinal products in the EU (EMEA/CVMP/865/03/Final) 2004, Ema, [accessed 18. 11. 10]. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/10/WC500004591.pdf.
49. Castle P. Replacement, reduction, refinement (3rs)-animal welfare progress in european pharmacopoeia monographs. Pharmeuropa 2007, 19:430-440.
50. Midtlyng P.J. Critical assessment of regulatory standards and tests for fish vaccines. Dev Biol 2005, vol. 121:219-226. Basel. P.J. Midtlyng (Ed.).
51. Jarp J., Tverdal A. Statistical aspects of fish vaccination trials. Dev Biol Stand 1997, vol. 90:311-320. R. Gudding, A. Lillehaug, P.J. Midtlyng, F. Brown (Eds.).
52. Nordmo R. Stengths and weaknesses of different challenge methods. Dev Biol Stand 1997, vol. 90:303-309. R. Gudding, A. Lillehaug, P.J. Midtlyng, F. Brown (Eds.).
53. Hendriksen C.F.M., Garthoff B., Aggerbeck H., Bruckner L., Castle P., Cussler K., et al. Alternatives to animal testing in the quality control of immunobiologicals: current status and future prospects. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 4 1994, ATLA 22, 420-434.
54. Grimholt U., Getahun A., Hermsen T., Stet R.J. The major histocompatibility complex class II alpha chain in salmonid fishes. Dev Comp Immunol 2000, 24:751-763.
55. Grimholt U., Larsen S., Nordmo R., Midtlyng P., Kjøglum S., Storset A., et al. MHC polymorphism and disease resistance in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar); facing pathogens with single expressed major histocompatibility class I and class II loci. Immunogenetics 2003, 55:210-219.
56. Wiegertjes GF. Immunogenetics of disease resistance in fish. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University; 1995.
57. Buchanan-Smith H., Rennie A.E., Vitale A., Pollo S., Prescott M.J., Morton D.B. Harmonising the definition of refinement. Anim Welf 2005, 14:379-384.
58. Guidelines on: the care and use of fish in research, teaching and testing 2005, Canadian Council on Animal Care, Canadian Council on Animal Care, Ottawa, [accessed 18. 11. 10]. http://www.ccac.ca.
59. Ortuno J., Esteban M.A., Meseguer J. Effects of four anaesthetics on the innate immune response of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.). Fish Shellfish Immunol 2002, 12:49-59.
60. Koppang E.O., Bjerkås I., Haugarvoll E., Chan E.K.L., Szabo N.J., Ono N., et al. Vaccination-induced systemic autoimmunity in farmed atlantic salmon. J Immunol 2008, 181:4807-4814.
61. Morton D.B., Jennings M., Buckwell A., Ewbank R., Godfrey C., Holgate B., et al. Refining procedures for the administration of substances. Lab Anim 2001, 35:1-41. Joint Working Group on Refinement, Report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement. British Veterinary Association Animal Welfare Foundation/Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments/Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals/Universities Federation for Animal Welfare.
62. Commission recommendation of 18 June 2007 on guidelines for the accommodation and care of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes (2007/526/EC). Off J Eur Union 2007, L97:1-89. European Commission.
63. Supplementary review of schedule 1 of the animals (scientific procedures) act 1986: appropriate methods of humane killing for fish 2009, Animal Procedures Committee, APC, London, [accessed 18. 11. 10]. http://apc.homeoffice.gov.uk/reference/apc_supplementary_review_schedule_1.pdf.
64. Johansen R., Needham J.R., Colquhoun D.J., Poppe T.T., Smith A.J. Guidelines for health and welfare monitoring of fish used in research. Lab Anim 2006, 40:323-340.
65. Berg A., Rödseth O.M., Tangeraas A., Hansen T. Time of vaccination influences development of adhesions, growth and spinal deformities in Atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Dis Aquat Organ 2006, 69:239-248.
66. Handley J.W. Environmental enrichment for fish used in regulatory toxicology studies. Anim Technol 2001, 52:227-231.
67. Unpublished data: results of a survey of UK fish users 2008, Animal Procedures Committee.
68. The UFAW handbook on the care and management of laboratory animals volume 2: amphibious and aquatic vertebrates and advanced invertebrates 1999, Blackwell Science, Oxford. 7th ed. T. Poole, P. English (Eds.).
69. Ostrander G., Bullock G., Bunton T. The laboratory fish 2000, Amsterdam.
70. Morton D.B., Griffiths P.H.M. Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment. Vet Rec 1985, 116:431-436.
71. Midtlyng P.J. Vaccinated fish welfare: protection vs. side-effects. Dev Biol Stand 1997, vol. 90:371-379. R. Gudding, A. Lillehaug, P.J. Midtlyng, F. Brown (Eds.).
72. Morton D.B. A scheme for the recognition and assessment of adverse effects in animals. Animal alternatives, welfare and ethics 1997, 235-240. Elsevier, Amsterdam. L.F.M. van Zutphen, M. Balls (Eds.).
73. Hawkins P. Recognizing and assessing pain, suffering and distress in laboratory animals: a survey of current practice in the UK with recommendations. Lab Anim 2002, 36:378-395.
74. Cussler K., Morton D.B., Hendriksen C.F.M. Humane endpoints in vaccine research and quality control. Humane endpoints in animal experiments for biomedical research 1999, 95-101. Royal Society of Medicine Press, London. C.F.M. Hendriksen, D.B. Morton (Eds.).
75. Toth L.A. Defining the moribund condition as an experimental endpoint for animal research. ILAR J 2000, 41:72-79.
76. Felasa FELASA recommendations on the education and training of persons working with laboratory animals: categories A and C. Lab Anim 1995, 29:121-131.
77. Felasa FELASA recommendations on the education and training of persons carrying out animal experiments (Category B). Lab Anim 2000, 34:229-235.