|
Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 340-344
|
Retroperitoneal versus direct femoral artery approach for thoracic endovascular aortic repair access: A case-control study
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
AORTIC ARTERY CONDUIT;
AORTOBIFEMORAL ARTERY GRAFT CONDUIT;
ARTICLE;
BLEEDING;
CASE CONTROL STUDY;
COMMON ILIAC ARTERY;
DIRECT FEMORAL ARTERY APPROACH;
DIRECT SHEATH INTRODUCTION THROUGH THE DISTAL AORTA;
FEMALE;
FLUOROSCOPY;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMAN;
ILIAC ARTERY CONDUIT;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MORBIDITY;
MORTALITY;
OPERATION DURATION;
OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RETROPERITONEAL APPROACH;
RETROPERITONEAL HEMATOMA;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
SURGICAL APPROACH;
THORACIC ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR;
TREATMENT FAILURE;
VASCULAR ACCESS;
VASCULAR SURGERY;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
AORTA, THORACIC;
AORTIC DISEASES;
BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS;
BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION;
CASE-CONTROL STUDIES;
ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES;
FEMALE;
FEMORAL ARTERY;
FLORIDA;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PROSTHESIS DESIGN;
RETROPERITONEAL SPACE;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
RISK FACTORS;
STENTS;
TIME FACTORS;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 79952536566
PISSN: 08905096
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.09.015 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (12)
|
References (10)
|