Indoor Environment Classification and Perceptual Matching

Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference, KR 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 73-83

  Pirri, Fiora ^a  

^a Dipartimento di Informatica e Sistemistica   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATABASE SYSTEMS; TREES (MATHEMATICS); WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

'CURRENT; ENERGY VALUE; ENVIRONMENT CLASSIFICATION; INDOOR ENVIRONMENT; PERCEPTUAL MATCHING; PRIOR INFORMATION; SALIENCY MAP; STATISTICAL INFORMATION; TREE-STRUCTURED; WAVELETS TRANSFORM;

LOCATION;

EID: 79952516102     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Bacchus, F.; Halpern, J.; and Levesque, H. 1999. Reasoning about noisy sensors in the situation calculus. Artificial Intelligence 111:171-208.
2. Baluja, S., and Pommerleau, D. A. 1995. Using a saliency map for active spatial selective attention: Implementation & initial results. In Tesauro, G.; Touretzky, D.; and Leen, T., eds., Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 7, 451-458. The MIT Press.
3. Chang, T., and Kuo, C. 1992. Tree-sturctured wavelet transform for textured image segmentation. SPIE 1770:394-405.
4. Chang, T., and Kuo, C. 1993. Texture analysis and classification with tree-structured wavelet transform. IEEE Transaction Image Processing 2(4):429-441.
5. Darrell, T., and Pentland, A. 1995. Attention-driven expression and gesture analysis in an interactive environment. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 135-140.
6. Golden, K., and Weld, D. 1996. Representing sensing actions: The middle ground revisited. In KR'96: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. 174-185. Hurley, S. 1998. Consciousness in Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Itti, L., and Koch, C. 1998. Learning to detect salient objects in natural scenes using visual attention. In DARPA98, 1201-1206.
8. Itti, L., and Koch, C. 2000. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention.
9. Itti, L.; Koch, C.; and Niebur, E. 1998. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20(11):1254-1259.
10. Koch, C., and Ullman, S. 1985. Shifts in selective visual-attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology 4(4):219-227.
11. Laine, A., and Fan, J. 1993. Texture classification by wavelet packet signatures. PAMI 15(11):1186-1191.
12. Lavie, N. 1995. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21:451-468.
13. Levesque, H. J., and Scherl, R. B. 1993. The frame problem and knowledge-producing actions. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'93), 689-695.
14. Li, J.; Najmi, A.; and Gray, R. 1999. Image classication by a two dimensional Hidden Markov Model. In IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.
15. Nikolaidis, N.; Pitas, I.; and Mallot, H. 2000. Computational Vision: Information Processing in Perception and Visual Behavior. MIT Press.
16. Noe, A.; Pessoa, L.; and Thompson, E. 2000. Beyond the grand illusion: what change blindness really teaches us about vision. Visual Cognition 7(1-3):93-106.
17. Pirri, F., and Finzi, A. 1999. An approach to perception in theory of actions: Part I. ETAI 3:19-61.
18. Pirri, F., and Reiter, R. 1999. Some contributions to the metatheory of the situation calculus. Journal of the ACM 46(3):325-361.
19. Pirri, F., and Reiter, R. 2000. Planning with natural actions in the situation calculus. 213-231.
20. Pirri, F., and Romano, M. 2002. A Situation-Bayes view of object recognition based on symgeons. In The Third International Cognitive Robotics Workshop.
21. Pirri, F., and Romano, M. 2003. 2d qualitative recognition of symgeon aspects. In Soft Computing Techniques for 3D Vision - KES2003, 1187-1194.
22. Pirrone, M. 2003. Active vision and visual attention for indoor environment classifcation. Technical report, University of Roma'La Sapienza'.
23. Rabiner, L. R., and Juang, B. H. 1986. An introduction to hidden Markov models. IEEE ASSP Magazine 4-15.
24. Rees, G.; Frith, C.; and Lavie, N. 1997. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science 278(5343):1616-1619.
25. Reiter, R. 2001a. KNOWLEDGE IN ACTION: Logical Foundations for Building Dynamic Systems. MIT press.
26. Reiter, R. 2001b. On knowledge-based programming with sensing in the situation calculus. ACM Trans. Comput. Logic 2(4):433-457.
27. Romberg, J. K.; Choi, H.; and Baraniuk, R. G. 1999. Bayesian tree-structured image modeling using wavelet-domain hidden Markov models. In SPIE Technical Conference on Mathematical Modeling, Bayesian Estimation, and Inverse Problems, volume 3816, 31-44.
28. Shanahan, M. 2002. A logical account of perception incorporating feedback and expectation. In Proceedings of KR2002. 3-13.
29. Shanahan, M. 2004. A logic based formulation of active visual perception. In Proceedings of KR2004.
30. Siegel, M.; Koerding, K. P.; and Koenig, P. 2000. Integrating top-down and bottom-up sensory processing by somato-dendritic interactions. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 8:161-173.
31. Thrun, S. 2002. Particle filters in robotics. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in AI (UAI).
32. Viterbi, A. 1967. Error bounds for convolutional codes an an asymptotically optimal decoding algorithm. IEEE Transaction on Information Theory IT-13:260-269.