Indicators of development as sexually selected traits: The developmental stress hypothesis in context

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-9

  Spencer, Karen A ^a   MacDougall Shackleton, Scott A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Animal communication; Bird song; Development; Fluctuating asymmetry; Sexual selection; Stress

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LEARNING; SEXUAL SELECTION; SONG; SONGBIRD;

ANIMALIA; AVES;

EID: 79952505091     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: 14657279     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arq068     Document Type: Review

References (107)

1. Airey DC, Buchanan KL, Szekely T, Catchpole CK, De Voogd TJ. 2000. Song, sexual selection, and a song control nucleus (HVc) in the brains of European sedge warblers. J Neurobiol. 44:1-6. (Pubitemid 30451663)
2. Airey DC, De Voogd TJ. 2000. Greater song complexity is associated with augmented song system anatomy in zebra finches. Neuroreport. 11:2339-2344. (Pubitemid 30485588)
3. Bateson P, Barker D, Clutton-Brock T, Deb D, D'Udine B, Foley RA, Gluckman P, Godfrey K, Kirkwood T, Lahr MM, et al. 2004. Developmental plasticity and human health. Nature. 430:419-421. (Pubitemid 38987896)
4. Bateson P, Hinde RA. 1987. Developmental changes in sensitivity to experience. In: Bornstein MH, editor. Sensitive periods in development. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum. p. 19-34.
5. Bednekoff PA, Biebach H, Krebs J. 1994. Great tit fat reserves under unpredictable temperatures. J Avian Biol. 25:156-160. (Pubitemid 2087775)
6. Beecher MD, Brenowitz EA. 2005. Functional aspects of song learning in songbirds. Trends Ecol Evol. 20:143-149. (Pubitemid 40257095)
7. Bolhuis JJ. 1999. The development of animal behavior: from Lorenz to neural nets. Naturwissenschaften. 86:101-111. (Pubitemid 29152371)
8. Bolhuis JJ, Honey RC. 1998. Imprinting, learning and development: from behaviour to brain and back. Trends Neurosci. 21:306-311. (Pubitemid 28293641)
9. Boogert NJ, Giraldeau L-A, Lefebvre L. 2008. Song complexity correlates with learning ability in zebra finch males. Anim Behav. 76:1735-1741.
10. Bottjer SW, Glaessner SL, Arnold AP. 1985. Ontogeny of brain nuclei controlling song learning and behavior in zebra finches. J Neurosci. 5:1556-1562. (Pubitemid 15041471)
11. Bottjer SW, Johnson F. 1997. Circuits, hormones, and learning: vocal behavior in songbirds. J Neurobiol. 33:602-618. (Pubitemid 27456455)
12. Brenowitz EA, Beecher MD. 2005. Song learning in birds: diversity and plasticity, opportunities and challenges. Trends Neurosci. 28:127-132. (Pubitemid 40320757)
13. Brenowitz EA, Lent K, Kroodsma DE. 1995. Brain space for learned song in birds develops independently of song learning. J Neurosci. 15:6281-6286.
14. Brenowitz EA, Margoliash D, Nordeen KW. 1997. An introduction to birdsong and the avian song system. J Neurobiol. 33:495-500. (Pubitemid 27456448)
15. Brown WM, Cronk L, Grochow K, Jacobson A, Liu CK, Popovic Z, Trivers R. 2005. Dance reveals symmetry especially in young men. Nature. 438:1148-1150. (Pubitemid 41831683)
16. Buchanan KL, Catchpole CK. 2000. Song as an indicator of male parental effort in the sedge warbler. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 267:321-326. (Pubitemid 30133053)
17. Buchanan KL, Leitner S, Spencer KA, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2004. Developmental stress selectively affects brain nuclei HVC in the zebra finch. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 271:2381-2386.
18. Buchanan KL, Spencer KA, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2003. Song as an honest signal of past developmental stress in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 270:1149-1156. (Pubitemid 36683459)
19. Canady RA, Kroodsma DE, Nottebohm F. 1984. Population differences in complexity of a learned skill are correlated with the brain space involved. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Biol Sci. 81:6232-6234. (Pubitemid 15220814)
20. Clarke GM, Brand GW, Whitten MJ. 1986. Fluctuating Asymmetry-a technique for measuring developmental stress caused by inbreeding. Aust J Biol Sci. 39:145-153.
21. Clayton NS. 1996. Development of food-storing and the hippocampus in juvenile marsh tits (Parus palustris). Behav Brain Res. 74:153-159. (Pubitemid 26060031)
22. Clayton NS, Krebs JR. 1994. Hippocampal growth and attrition in birds affected by experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 91:7410-7414. (Pubitemid 24238193)
23. Collins SA, Hubbard C, Houtman AM. 1994. Female mate choice in the zebra finch-the effect of male beak color and male song. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 35:21-25. (Pubitemid 2115774)
24. Cuthill IC, Maddocks SA, Weall CV, Jones E K M. 2000. Body mass regulation in response to changes in feeding predictability and overnight energy expenditure. Behav Ecol. 11:189-195. (Pubitemid 30217961)
25. De Voogd TJ, Krebs JR, Healy SD, Purvis A. 1993. Relations between song repertoire size and the volume of brain nuclei related to song-comparative evolutionary analyses amongst oscine birds. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 254:75-82. (Pubitemid 24016976)
26. Doutrelant C, Blondel J, Perret P, Lambrechts MM. 2000. Blue tit song repertoire size, male quality and interspecific competition. J Avian Biol. 31:360-366.
27. Dreiss A, Richard M, Moyen F, White J, Moller AP, Danchin E. 2006. Sex ratio and male sexual characters in a population of blue tits, Parus caeruleus. Behav Ecol. 17:13-19. (Pubitemid 41746707)
28. Dubovicky M, Skultetyova S, Jezova D. 1999. Neonatal stress alters habituation of exploratory behavior in adult male but not female rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 64:681-686.
29. Folstad I, Karter AJ. 1992. Parasites, bright males, and the immunocompetence handicap. Am Nat. 139:603-622.
30. Gahr M, Metzdorf R, Schmidl D, Wickler W. 2008. Bi-directional sexual dimorphisms of the song control nucleus HVC in a songbird with unison song. PLoS One. 3: e3073.
31. Garamszegi LZ, Eens M. 2004. Brain space for a learned task: strong intraspecific evidence for neural correlates of singing behavior in songbirds. Brain Res Rev. 44:187-193. (Pubitemid 38293433)
32. Gil D, Naguib M, Riebel K, Rutstein A, Gahr M. 2006. Early condition, song learning, and the volume of song brain nuclei in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). J Neurobiol. 66:1602-1612. (Pubitemid 46005370)
33. Gorissen L, Snoeijs T, Van Duyse E, Eens M. 2005. Heavy metal pollution affects dawn singing behaviour in a small passerine bird. Oecologia. 145:504-509. (Pubitemid 41407857)
34. Hayward LS, Richardson JB, Grogan MN, Wingfield JC. 2006. Sex differences in the organizational effects of corticosterone in the egg yolk of quail. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 146:144-148. (Pubitemid 43351167)
35. Hayward LS, Wingfield JC. 2004. Maternal corticosterone is transferred to avian yolk and may alter offspring growth and adult phenotype. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 135:365-471.
36. Henry C, Kabbaj M, Simon H, Lemoal M, Maccari S. 1994. Prenatal stress increases the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis response in young and adult-rats. J Neuroendocrinol. 6:341-345. (Pubitemid 24189873)
37. Holveck MJ, Riebel K. 2010. Low-quality females prefer low-quality males when choosing a mate. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 277:153-160.
38. Holveck M-J, Vieira de Castro AC, Lachlan RF, ten Cate C, Riebel K. 2008. Accuracy of song syntax learning and singing consistency signal early conditioninzebra finches. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 19:1267-1281.
39. Irwin RE. 1988. The evolutionary importance of behavioral-development-the ontogeny and phylogeny of bird song. Anim Behav. 36:814-824.
40. Kempster B, Zanette L, Longstaffe FJ, MacDougall-Shackleton SA, Wingfield JC, Clinchy M. 2007. Do stable isotopes reflect nutritional stress? Results from a laboratory experiment on song sparrows. Oecologia. 151:1432-1439.
41. Kent S, Tom C, Levine S. 1997. Effect of interleukin-1 beta on pituitary-adrenal responses and body weight in neonatal rats: interaction with maternal deprivation. Stress. 1:213-230.
42. de Kloet ER. 2000. Stress in the brain. Eur J Pharmacol. 405:187-198.
43. de Kogel CH, Prijs HJ. 1996. Effects of brood size manipulations on sexual attractiveness of offspring in the zebra finch. Anim Behav. 51:699-708.
44. Krebs J, Ashcroft R, Webber M. 1978. Song repertoires and territory defence in great tit. Nature. 271:539-542. (Pubitemid 8266713)
45. Krebs JR. 1977. Significance of song repertoires-Beau Geste hypothesis. Anim Behav. 25:475-478. (Pubitemid 8186375)
46. Kroodsma DE. 1976. Reproductive development in a female songbird-differential stimulation by quality of male song. Science. 192:574-575.
47. Lambrechts M, Dhondt AA. 1988. The anti-exhaustion hypothesis-a new hypothesis to explain song performance and song switching in the great tit. Anim Behav. 36:327-334.
48. Levine S, Huchton DM, Wiener SG, Rosenfeld P. 1991. Time course of the effect of maternal-deprivation on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis in the infant rat. Dev Psychobiol. 24:547-558.
49. Liu D, Diorio J, Tannenbaum B, Caldji C, Francis D, Freedman A, Sharma S, Pearson D, Plotsky PM, Meaney MJ. 1997. Maternal care, hippocampal glucocorticoid receptors, and hypothalamic-pituitaryadrenal responses to stress. Science. 277:1659-1662. (Pubitemid 27446227)
50. MacDonald IF, Kempster B, Zanette L, MacDougall-Shackleton SA. 2006. Early nutritional stress impairs development of a song-control brain region in both male and female juvenile song sparrows (Melospiza melodia) at the onset of song learning. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 273:2559-2564. (Pubitemid 44439678)
51. MacDougall-Shackleton SA. 1997. Sexual selection and the evolution of song repertoires. Curr Ornithol. 14:81-125.
52. Marler P. 1970. A comparative approach to vocal learning-song development in white-crowned sparrows. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 71:1-25.
53. Marler P, Peters S. 1987. A sensitive period for song acquisition in the song sparrow, Melospiza melodia-a case of age-limited learning. Ethology. 76:89-100.
54. Marler P, Peters S, Wingfield J. 1987. Correlations between song acquisition, song production, and plasma-levels of testosterone and estradiol in sparrows. J Neurobiol. 18:531-548. (Pubitemid 18020049)
55. Marler P, Tamura M. 1964. Song "dialects" in three populations of white-crowned sparrows. Science. 146:1483-1486.
56. McEwen BS, Sapolsky RM. 1995. Stress and cognitive function. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 5:205-216.
57. Metcalfe NB, Monaghan P. 2001. Compensation for a bad start: grow now, pay later? Trends Ecol Evol. 16:254-260. (Pubitemid 32288153)
58. Miller G. 2000.. The mating mind: how sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Doubleday.
59. Møller AP, Swaddle JP. 1998. Asymmetry, developmental stability, and evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Naguib M, Gil D. 2005. Transgenerational effects on body size caused by early developmental stress in zebra finches. Biol Lett. 1:95-97. (Pubitemid 41534580)
61. Naguib M, Heim C, Gil D. 2008. Early developmental conditions and male attractiveness in zebra finches. Ethology. 114:255-261. (Pubitemid 351248579)
62. Naguib M, Riebel K, Marzal A, Gil D. 2004. Nestling immunocompetence and testosterone covary with brood size in a songbird. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 271:833-838. (Pubitemid 38491270)
63. Nordeen KW, Marler P, Nordeen EJ. 1989. Addition of song-related neurons in swamp sparrows coincides with memorization, not production, of learned songs. J Neurobiol. 20:651-661.
64. Nordeen KW, Nordeen EJ. 1988. Projection neurons within a vocal motor pathway are born during song learning in zebra finches. Nature. 334:149-151.
65. Nottebohm F. 2005. The neural basis of birdsong. Plos Biology. 3:759-761.
66. Nowicki S, Hasselquist D, Bensch S, Peters S. 2000. Nestling growth and song repertoire sire in great reed warblers: evidence for song learning as an indicator mechanism in mate choice. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 267:2419-2424. (Pubitemid 32001484)
67. Nowicki S, Peters S, Podos J. 1998. Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Am Zool. 38:179-190.
68. Nowicki S, Searcy WA, Peters S. 2002a. Brain development, song learning and mate choice in birds: a review and experimental test of the "nutritional stress hypothesis". J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 188:1003-1014. (Pubitemid 36251493)
69. Nowicki S, Searcy WA, Peters S. 2002b. Quality of song learning 806 affects female response to male bird song. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 269:1949-1954.
70. Palmer AR. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry analyses: a primer. In: Markow TA, editor. Developmental instability: its origins and evolutionary implications. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Kluwer. p. 335-364.
71. Palmer AR. 1996. Waltzing with asymmetry. Bioscience. 46:518-532. (Pubitemid 26311013)
72. Parsons PA. 1990. Fluctuating asymmetry-an epigenetic measure of stress. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 65:131-145.
73. Parsons PA. 1992. Fluctuating asymmetry-a biological monitor of environmental and genomic stress. Heredity. 68:361-364.
74. Pravosudov VV, Kitaysky AS. 2006. Effects of nutritional restrictions during post-hatching development on adrenocortical function in western scrub-jays (Aphelocoma californica). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 145:25-31. (Pubitemid 41772999)
75. Rehsteiner U, Geisser H, Reyer HU. 1998. Singing and mating success in water pipits: one specific song element makes all the difference. Anim Behav. 55:1471-1481. (Pubitemid 28329751)
76. Rots NY, de Jong J, Workel JO, Levine S, Cools AR, de Kloet ER. 1996. Neonatal maternally deprived rats have as adults elevated basal pituitary-adrenal activity and enhanced susceptibility to apomorphine. J Neuroendocrinol. 8:501-506. (Pubitemid 26239717)
77. Sartor JJ, Ball GF. 2005. Social suppression of song is associated with a reduction in volume of a song-control nucleus in European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Behav Neurosci. 119:233-244. (Pubitemid 40279513)
78. Sartor JJ, Balthazart J, Riters LV, Ball GF. 2004. The roles of testosterone and singing in the regulation of seasonal neuroplasticity in songbirds. Horm Behav. 46:121-121.
79. Sartor JJ, Diekamp B, Fortune ES, Ball GF. 2005. Neuroplasticity in the song nucleus HVC is modulated by testosterone and production of the bird's own song in songbirds. Horm Behav. 48:126-126.
80. Scheib JE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. 1999. Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 266:1913-1917. (Pubitemid 29457076)
81. Searcy WA. 1992. Song repertoire and mate choice in birds. Am Zool. 32:71-80. (Pubitemid 23400787)
82. Searcy WA, Andersson M. 1986. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 17:507-533.
83. Searcy WA, Nowicki S. 2005. The evolution of animal communication. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
84. Sinervo B, Svensson E. 1998. Mechanistic and selective causes of life history trade offs and plasticity. Oikos. 83:432-442. (Pubitemid 29072986)
85. Soma M, Takahasi M, Ikebuchi M, Yamada H, Suzuki M, Hasegawa T, Okanoya K. 2006. Early rearing conditions affect the development of body size and song in Bengalese finches. Ethology. 112:1071-1078. (Pubitemid 44564232)
86. Spencer KA, Buchanan KL, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2003. Song as an honest signal of developmental stress in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Horm Behav. 44:132-139. (Pubitemid 37108635)
87. Spencer KA, Buchanan KL, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2004. Developmental stress, social rank and song complexity in the European starling (Stumus vulgaris). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 271: S121-S123. (Pubitemid 38186928)
88. Spencer KA, Buchanan KL, Leitner S, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2005a. Parasites affect song complexity and neural development in a songbird. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 272:2037-2043. (Pubitemid 41416038)
89. Spencer KA, Evans NP, Monaghan P. 2009. Postnatal stress in birds: a novel model of glucocorticoid programming of the hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal axis. Endocrinology. 150:1931-1934.
90. Spencer KA, Harris S, Baker P, Cuthill IC. 2007. Song development in birds: the effects of early conditions and implications for rehabilitation protocols. Anim Welf. 16:1-22.
91. Spencer KA, Wimpenny JH, Buchanan KL, Lovell PG, Goldsmith AR, Catchpole CK. 2005b. Developmental stress affects the attractiveness of male song and female choice in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 58:423-428. (Pubitemid 41033784)
92. Swaddle JP. 1999. Limits to length asymmetry detection in starlings: implications for biological signaling. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 266:1299-1303. (Pubitemid 29353777)
93. Swaddle JP. 2003. Fluctuating asymmetry, animal behavior, and evolution. Adv Study Behav. 32:169-205.
94. Swaddle JP, Cuthill IC. 1994. preference for symmetrical males by female zebra finches. Nature. 367:165-166.
95. Swaddle JP, Ruff DA, Page LC, Frame AM, Long VA. 2008. A test of receiver perceptual performance: European starlings' ability to detect asymmetry in a naturalistic trait. Anim Behav. 76:487-495.
96. Szekely T, Catchpole CK, De Voogd A, Marchl Z, De Voogd TJ. 1996. Evolutionary changes in a song control area of the brain (HVC) are associated with evolutionary changes in song repertoire among European warblers (Sylviidae). Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 263:607-610. (Pubitemid 26169444)
97. Tinbergen N. 1963. On aims and methods in ethology. Zeitschrift Tierpsychol. 20:410-433.
98. Thornhill R. 1992. Female preference for the pheromone of males with low fluctuating asymmetry in the Japanese scorpionfly (Panorpa-Japonica, Mecoptera). Behav Ecol. 3:277-283. (Pubitemid 23401605)
99. Vallet E, Beme I, Kreutzer M. 1998. Two-note syllables in canary songs elicit high levels of sexual display. Anim Behav. 55:291-297. (Pubitemid 28165231)
100. Vallet E, Kreutzer M. 1995. Female canaries are sexually responsive to special song phrases. Anim Behav. 49:1603-1610.
101. Wada H, Salvante KG, Stables C, Wagner E, Williams TD, Breuner CW. 2008. Adrenocortical responses in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata): individual variation, repeatability, and relationship to phenotypic quality. Horm Behav. 53:472-480.
102. Ward IL, Ward OB, Winn RJ, Bielawski D. 1994. Male and female sexual behavior potential of male-rats prenatally exposed to the influence of alcohol, stress, or both factors. Behav Neurosci. 108:1188-1195.
103. Weinstock M. 1997. Does prenatal stress impair coping and regulation of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 21:1-10. (Pubitemid 27044546)
104. Weinstock M. 2008. The long-term behavioural consequences of prenatal stress. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 32:1073-1086.
105. Wingfield JC, Maney DL, Breuner CW, Jacobs JD, Lynn S, Ramenofsky M, Richardson RD. 1998. Ecological bases of hormone-behavior interactions: the "emergency life history stage". Am Zool. 38:191-206.
106. Zahavi A. 1975. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 53:205-214.
107. Zann R, Cash E. 2008. Developmental stress impairs song complexity but not learning accuracy in non-domesticated zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 62:391-400. (Pubitemid 350292568)