What it is: The biology and moral status of parthenotes and embryos

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 29-30

  Kabasenche, William Paul ^a  

^a WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL EMBRYO; ARTICLE; EMBRYO RESEARCH; ETHICS; HUMAN; MORALITY; PARTHENOGENESIS; PERSONHOOD;

ANIMALS; EMBRYO RESEARCH; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; HUMANS; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PARTHENOGENESIS; PERSONHOOD;

EID: 79952498849     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2010.546478     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Fangerau, H. 2005. Can artificial parthenogenesis sidestep ethical pitfalls in human therapeutic cloning? An historical perspective. Journal of Medical Ethics 31(12): 733-735.
2. George, R. P., and C. Tollefsen. 2008. Embryo: A defense of human life. New York: Doubleday.
3. Hopkins, P. D. 1998. How popular media represent cloning as an ethical problem. Hastings Center Report 28(2): 6-13.
4. Rodriguez, S., L. Campo-Engelstein, C. Tingen, and T. Woodruff. 2011. An obscure rider obstructing science: The conflation of parthenotes with embryos in the Dickey-Wicker Amendment. American Journal of Bioethics 11(3): 20-28.
5. Skinner, M., M. Manikkam, and C. Guerrero-Bosagna. 2010. Epigenetic transgnerational actions of environmental factors in disease etiology. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism 21(4): 214-222.