When care is left to roam: Carers' experiences of grassroots nonprofit services in Ireland

Health and Place

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 422-429

  Power, Andrew ^a   Kenny, Kate ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Caregiving; Disability; Ireland; Nonprofit; Organisation; Voluntarism

Indexed keywords

DISABILITY; GRASSROOTS LEVEL; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SERVICES; NONPROFIT ORGANIZATION; SERVICE PROVISION; VOLUNTARY APPROACH;

ARTICLE; CAREGIVER; DAY CARE; DECISION MAKING; GEOGRAPHY; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; IRELAND; NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION; PATIENT AUTONOMY; POLICY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONALISM; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL CARE; WELFARE;

IRELAND;

EID: 79952489161     PISSN: 13538292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.001     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ackroyd S. From public administration to public sector management: a consideration of public policy in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Public Sector Management 1995, 8(2):4-24.
2. Arnold T. Emerging Questions and Future Directions. Differing Images: The Irish Nonprofit Sector and Comparative Perspectives 2007, 75-81. The Liffey Press, Dublin. G. Donnelly-Cox, C. Breathnach (Eds.).
3. Barnett P., Barnett J.R. New times, new relationships: mental health, primary care and public health in New Zealand. Landscapes of Voluntarism: New spaces of health, welfare and governance 2006, 73-90. Policy Press, Bristol. C. Milligan, D. Conradson (Eds.).
4. Blumer H. What is wrong with SOCIAL theory?. American Sociological Review 1954, 19:3-10.
5. Broderick, B. (2009) Closing Address at "Taking Control" Conference, 18 October 2008, Dublin, Ireland. (accessed 20.12.2008). http://www.inclusionireland.ie/documents/BrendanBroderick-presentation.doc.
6. Comptroller and Auditor General (2005) Report on Value for Money Examination: Provision of Disability Services by Nonprofit Organisations. Dublin: Comptroller and Auditor General.
7. De Vries M. The rise and fall of decentralization: a comparative analysis of arguments and practices in European countries. European Journal of Political Research 2007, 38:193-224.
8. Department of Social, Community and Family Affairs White Paper on a Framework for Supporting Voluntary Activity and for Developing the Relationship between the State and the Community and Voluntary Sector 2000, Stationary Office, Dublin.
9. Department of Health Valuing People: A New Strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st Century 2001, UK Government, London.
10. Department of Health The Problem of the Mentally Handicapped 1960, Stationery Office, Dublin.
11. Department of Health and Children A Vision for Change: Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy 2006, Stationary Office, Dublin.
12. Donoghue F. Reflecting the Relationships; An Exploration of Relationships between the former Eastern Health Board and Voluntary Organisations in the Eastern Region. ERHA 2002.
13. Hood A public management for all seasons?. Public Administration 1991, 69:3-19.
14. Kramer R. Nonprofit Social Service Agencies and the Welfare State: Some Research Considerations. The Third Sector: Comparative Studies of Nonprofit Organizations 1990, 255-267. de Gruyter, New York. H. Anheir, W. Seibel (Eds.).
15. Le Grand Competition, collaboration or control? Tales from the British National Health Service. Health Affairs 1999, 18:27-37.
16. Liebman J., Sabel C. A public laboratory dewey barely imagined: the emerging model of school governance and legal reform. New York University Review of Law and Social Change. 2003, 184-300.
17. Marsh, I. & Spies-Butcher, B. (2007) Program design for continuous improvement in human services: a case study of Australia's disability employment sector, (accessed 20.02.2009). http://www.workplace.gov.au/NR/rdonlyres/AB3C66B1-30E8-424D-A372-75DE41A4FC96/0/182UniversityofSydney.pdf.
18. Merton R. Social Theory and Social Structure 1957, The Free Press, Clencoe, IL.
19. Milligan C., Conradson D. Landscapes of Voluntarism: New Spaces of Health, Welfare and Governance 2006, Policy Press, Bristol.
20. Morgan D.G., Semchuk K.M., Stewart N.J., D 'Arcy C. Rural families caring for a relative with dementia: barriers to use of formal services. Social Science and Medicine 2002, 55:1129-1142.
21. Noonan K.G., Sabel C., Simon W.H. The rule of law in the experimentalist welfare state: lessons from child welfare reform. Columbia Public Law Research Paper 2008, 8-16.
22. Osbourne S. Voluntary Organisations and Innovation in Public Services 1998, Routledge, London.
23. Popay J., Williams F., Oakely A. Welfare Research: A Critical Review 1999, UCL Press, London.
24. Ryan A. Walls of Silence: Ireland's Policy Towards People with a Mental Disability 1999, Red Lion Press, Kilkenny.
25. Sabel C. Beyond principal-Agent Governance: Experimentalist Organisation, Learning and Accountability. De Staat van de Democratie. Democratie voorbij de Staat. WRR Verkenning 3 2006, 173-195. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam. Ewald Engelen, M.S.D. Ho (Eds.).
26. Salamon L., Wojciech S., Anheier H. Social Origins of Civil Society: An Overview. Working Papers of the John Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project 2000, No. 38. The John Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies, Baltimore.
27. Salamon L., Sokolowski S.W., List R. Global civil society: an overview: centre for civil society studies 2003, The Johns Hopkins Institute for Policy Studies, Baltimore.
28. Thomas, Davies Theorizing the micro-politics of resistance: new public management and managerial identities in the UK public services. Organisation Studies 2005, 26(5):683-706.
29. Van Til J. Wonderland 2006: The Nonprofit Sector in the US. Differing Images: The Irish Nonprofit Sector and Comparative Perspectives 2007, 29-39. The Liffey Press, Dublin. G. Donnelly- Cox, C. Breathnach (Eds.).
30. Wilkin D., Coleman A., Dowling B., Smith K. National Tracker Survey of Primary Care Groups and Trusts 2001/2002. Taking Responsibility? 2002, Kings Fund, London.