Global Financial Crisis, Public Administration and Governance: Do New Problems Require New Solutions?

Public Organization Review

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 13-27

  Peters, Guy ^a   Pierre, Jon ^b   Randma Liiv, Tiina ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Estonia)

Author keywords

Comparative public policy; Crisis management; Dichotomies; Governance

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952485940     PISSN: 15667170     EISSN: 15737098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11115-010-0148-x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Boin, A., McConnell, A., & 't Hart, P. (2008). Governing after crisis: The politics of investigation, accountability and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Braun, D., & Busch, A. (1999). Political ideas and public policies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
4. Calmes J, Zelenes J (2008) Obama vows swift action on vast stimulus program. The New York Times, 22 November.
5. Fleischer, J. (2010). Steering from the German center: More policy coordination and fewer policy initiatives. In C. Dahlström, B. G. Peters, & J. Pierre (Eds.), Steering from the center. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
6. Hood, C. (2010). Blame avoidance in government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7. Kattel, R. (2009). The rise and fall of the Baltic states. Development & Transition, 13, 11-13.
8. Kingdon, J. W., & Thurber, J. A. (2003). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York: Longman.
9. Light, P. C. (1995). Thickening government. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
10. March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: The Free Press.
11. Painter, M. A., & Peters, B. G. (Eds.). (2010). Tradition and public administration. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
12. Peters, B. G. (1998). What works? The antiphons of administrative reform. In B. G. Peters & D. J. Savoie (Eds.), Taking stock: Assessing public sector reforms. Montreal: McGill/Queens University Press.
13. Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2004). Politicization of the civil service: The quest for control. London: Routledge.
14. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251-67.
15. Simon, H. A. (1947). Administratve behavior. New York: The Free Press.
16. Steinmo, S., Thelen, K., & Longstreth, F. (1992). Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Weaver, R. K., & Rockman, B. A. (1993). Do institutions matter? Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
18. Wildavsky, A. (1984). The politics of the budgetary process (4th ed.). Boston: Little, Brown.