Contact pressure comparison of proud osteochondral autograft plugs versus proud synthetic plugs

Orthopedics

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Harris, Joshua D ^a   Solak, Kraig K ^c   Siston, Robert A ^b   Litsky, Alan ^a   Richards, Jason ^d   Flanigan, David C ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b The Ohio State University   (United States)

^c Precision Orthopaedic Specialists   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM SULFATE; POLYGLYCOLIC ACID; BIOMIMETIC MATERIAL;

ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE GRAFT; CADAVER; CALIBRATION; CONTACT STRESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR CONDYLE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE DISEASE; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CARTILAGE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE; PRESSURE; PROSTHESIS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TRANSPLANTATION;

BIOMIMETIC MATERIALS; BONE TRANSPLANTATION; CARTILAGE; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; PRESSURE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS;

EID: 79952477669     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20101221-06     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Curl WW, Krome J, Gordon ES, Rushing J, Smith BP, Poehling GG. Cartilage injuries: a review of 31,516 knee arthroscopies. Arthroscopy. 1997; 13(4):456-460. (Pubitemid 27344113)
2. Heir S, Nerhus TK, Røtterud JH, et al. Focal cartilage defects in the knee impair quality of life as much as severe osteoarthritis: a comparison of knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score in 4 patient categories scheduled for knee surgery [published online ahead of print December 30, 2009]. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(2):231-237.
3. Cole BJ, Pascual-Garrido C, Grumet RC. Surgical management of articular cartilage defects in the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91(7):1778-1790.
4. Kerker JT, Leo AJ, Sgaglione NA. Cartilage repair: synthetics and scaffolds: basic science, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2008; 16(4):208-216.
5. Fregly BJ, Bei Y, Sylvester ME. Experimental evaluation of an elastic foundation model to predict contact pressures in knee replacements. J Biomech. 2003; 36(11):1659-1668. (Pubitemid 37163763)
6. Nakagawa Y, Suzuki T, Kuroki H, Kobayashi M, Okamoto Y, Nakamura T. The effect of surface incongruity of grafted plugs in osteochondral grafting: a report of five cases [published online ahead of print January 12, 2007]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007; 15(5):591-596.
7. Koh JL, Kowalski A, Lautenschlager E. The effect of angled osteochondral grafting on contact pressure: a biomechanical study [published online ahead of print November 10, 2005]. Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34(1):116-119. (Pubitemid 43038237)
8. Koh JL, Wirsing K, Lautenschlager E, Zhang LO. The effect of graft height mismatch on contact pressure following osteochondral grafting: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32(2):317-320. (Pubitemid 38235496)
9. Hangody L, Dobos J, Baló E, Pánics G, Hangody LR, Berkes I. Clinical experiences with autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty in an athletic population: a 17-year prospective multicenter study [published online ahead of print April 1, 2010]. Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38(6):1125-1133.
10. Bedi A, Foo L, Williams R, Potter H. The maturation of synthetic scaffolds for osteochondral donor sites of the knee: an MRI and T2 mapping analysis. Cartilage. 2010; 1(1):20-28.
11. Hettrich CM, Crawford D, Rodeo SA. Cartilage repair: third-generation cell-based technologies - basic science, surgical techniques, clinical outcomes. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2008;16(4):230-235.
12. Niederauer GG, Slivka MA, Leatherbury NC, et al. Evaluation of multiphase implants for repair of focal osteochondral defects in goats. Biomaterials. 2000; 21(24):2561-2574.
13. Carmont MR, Carey-Smith R, Saithna A, Dhillon M, Thompson P, Spalding T. Delayed incorporation of a TruFit plug: perseverance is recommended. Arthroscopy. 2009; 25(7):810-814.