The National Joint Registry of England and Wales

Orthopedics

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Prime, Mathew S ^a   Palmer, Jonathan ^b   Khan, Wasim S ^c  

^a CHARING CROSS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL FREE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; DATA BASE; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; IMPLANT REGISTRY; INTERNET; JOINT PROSTHESIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; SHORT SURVEY; UNITED KINGDOM; ARTICLE; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MANDATORY REPORTING; REGISTER; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ENGLAND; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MANDATORY REPORTING; REGISTRIES; WALES;

EID: 79952476181     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20101221-21     Document Type: Short Survey

References (14)

1. National Joint Registry. NJR Centre Web site. http://www.njrcentre.org. uk/njrcentre/default.aspx. Accessed August 16, 2010.
2. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 7th annual report 2010. NJR Centre Web site. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/LinkClick.aspx? fileticket=QkPI7kk6B2E%3d&tabid=86&mid=523. Accessed September 16, 2010.
3. Horan F. The National Joint Registry for England and Wales. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85(1):1-2.
4. Maloney WJ. National Joint Replacement Registries: has the time come? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83(10):1582-1585. (Pubitemid 32953360)
5. Herberts P, Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000; 71(2):111-121. (Pubitemid 30611734)
6. Herberts P, Malchau H. How outcome studies have changed total hip arthroplasty practices in Sweden. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997; (344):44-60. (Pubitemid 27490635)
7. Massoud SN, Hunter JB, Holdworth BJ, Wallace WA, Juliusson R. Early femoral loosening in one design of cemented hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997; 79(4):603-608.
8. The Royal College of Surgeons of England. An Investigation of the Performance of the 3M Capital Hip System. London, England: The Royal College of Surgeons of England; 2001. http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/new-rcseng/content/ publications/docs/investigation-3m-capital-hip.html. Published July 2001. Accessed September 16, 2010.
9. Aims and objectives of the NJR. NJR Centre Web site. http://www. njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/AbouttheNJR/WhatistheNJR/tabid/76/Default.aspx. Accessed August 16, 2010.
10. An introduction to the NJR IT system. NJR Centre Web site. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/NjrCentre/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket= RPebhmaBgzI%3d&tabid=100&mid=440. Published December 2002. Accessed August 16, 2010.
11. StatsOnline. NJR Centre Web site. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/ Healthcareproviders/Accessingthedata/StatsOnline/tabid/117/Default.aspx. Accessed August 16, 2010.
12. Philipson MR, Westwood MJ, Geoghegan JM, Henry AP, Jefferiss CD. Shortcomings of the National Joint Registry: a survey of consultants' views. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005; 87(2):109-112. (Pubitemid 40394361)
13. Schneider EC, Epstein AM. Influence of cardiac-surgery performance reports on referral practices and access to care. A survey of cardiovascular specialists. N Engl J Med. 1996; 335(4):251-256. (Pubitemid 26249574)
14. National Cardiac Surgical Database Report 2000-2001. London, England: The Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland; 2002:245-246.