Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization with essure intratubal device: Analysis of results and complications;Esterilización mediante colocación histeroscópica del dispositivo intratubárico Essure: Análisis de resultados y complicaciones

Revista Iberoamericana de Fertilidad y Reproduccion Humana

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 525-529

  Paredes, Aida González ^a   Oliver, Antonio Rodríguez ^a   Parra, Jorge Fernández ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO VIRGEN DE LAS NIEVES   (Spain)

Author keywords

Essure; Female sterilization; Hysteroscopic sterilization

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICE; FEMALE; FEMALE STERILIZATION; HUMAN; HYSTEROSCOPY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; UTERINE TUBE STERILIZATION;

EID: 79952473618     PISSN: 11320249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Escobedo LG, Peterson HB, Grubb GS, Franks AL.: Case fatality notes for tubal sterilisation in US hospitals 1979 to 1980. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:147-150.
2. Garry R.: Towards evidence-based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas. Gynaecol Endosc 1999;8:315-326.
3. Peterson HB, Xia Z,Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussell J, U.S.: Collaborative Review of Sterilization Working Group. Pregnancy after tubal sterilization with silicone rubber band and spring clip application. Obstet Gynecol 2001;97:205-10.
4. Peterson HB, Xia Z, Hughes JM, Wilcox LS, Tylor LR, Trussel J.: The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174:1161-70. (Pubitemid 26131134)
5. Abbott J.: Transcervical sterilization. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;19(4):325-30
6. Smith RD.: Contemporary hysteroscopic methods for female sterilization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2010;108:79-84.
7. Kerin JF, Carignan CS, Cher D.: The safety and effectiveness of a new hysteroscopic method for permanent birth control: results of the first Essure (TM) pbc clinical study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 41:364-370. (Pubitemid 33100671)
8. Kerin JF, Levy BS.: Ultrasound: an effective method for localization of the echogenic Essure sterilization micro-insert: correlation with radiologic evaluations. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:50-4. (Pubitemid 40800351)
9. Miño M, Arjona JE, Cordón J, Pelegrin B, Povedano B, Chacon E.: Success rate and patient satisfaction with the Essure sterilisation in an outpatient setting: a prospective study of 857 women. BJOG 2007;114:763-6. (Pubitemid 46788666)
10. Ubeda A, Labastida R, Dexeus S.: Essure: a new device for hysteroscopic tubal sterilization in an outpatient setting. Fertil Steril 2004;82:196-9. (Pubitemid 38968798)
11. Lopes P, Gibon E, Linet T, Philippe HJ.: Hysteroscopic tubal sterilization with Essure intratubal devices: a case-control prospective with inert local anesthesia or without anesthesia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;138:199-203. (Pubitemid 351726041)
12. Sinha D, Kalathy V, Gupta JK, Clark TJ.: The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation. BJOG 2007;114:676-83. (Pubitemid 46788664)
13. Arjona JE, Miño M, Cordón J, Povedano B, Pelegrin B, Castelo-Branco C.: Satisfaction and tolerance with office hysteroscopic tubal sterilization. Fertil Steril 2008;90:1182-6.
14. Panel P, Grosdemouge I.: Predictive factors of Essure implant placement failure: prospective, multicenter study of 495 patients. Fertil Steril 2010;93:29-34.
15. Kerin JF, Cooper JM, Price T, van Herendael BJ, Cayuela-Font E, Cher D, et al.: Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre phase II study. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1223-30. (Pubitemid 36740568)
16. Connor VF.: Essure: a review six years later. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:282-90.
17. Veersema S, Vleugels MP, Moolenaar LM, Janssen CA, Brölmann HA.: Unintended pregnancies after Essure sterilization in the Netherlands. Fertil Steril 2010;93:35-8.
18. Veersema S, Vleugels MP, Timmermans A, Brölmann HA.: Follow-up of successful bilateral placement of Essure microinserts with ultrasound. Fertil Steril 2005;84:1733-6. (Pubitemid 41785672)
19. Weston G, Bowditch J.: Office ultrasound should be the first-line investigation for confirmation of correct ESSURE placement. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2005;45:312-5. (Pubitemid 41122595)
20. Sagili H, Divers M.: Hysteroscopic sterilisation with Essure: a promising new alternative to tubal ligation? J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 2008;34:99-102.
21. Levie MD, Chudnoff SG.: Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: a critical cost analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:318-322. (Pubitemid 40982534)
22. Kraemer DF, Yen PY, Nichols M.: An economic comparison of female sterilization of hysteroscopic tubal occlusion with laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation. Contraception 2009;80:254-60.