Adverse rotorcraft-pilot coupling: Test campaign development at the University of Liverpool

34th European Rotorcraft Forum 2008, ERF34

Volumn 1, Issue , 2008, Pages 740-786

  Jump, M ^a   Hodge, S ^a   Dang Vu, B ^b   Masarati, P ^c   Quaranta, G ^c   Mattaboni, M ^c   Pavel, M D ^d   Dieterich, O ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b ONERA   (France)

^c POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^d DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^e EUROCOPTER DEUTSCHLAND GMBH   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FLIGHT SIMULATION; RIGID BODY; RIGID BODY TEST; SLUNG LOAD; TEST CAMPAIGN; UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL;

AEROELASTICITY; AIRCRAFT; AUTOMOBILE BODIES; FLIGHT SIMULATORS; RIGID STRUCTURES;

HELICOPTER ROTORS;

EID: 79952472560     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. McFarland, M.W., The Papers of Wilbur and Orville Wright. 1st ed. 1953, New York: McGraw-Hill.
2. Lawrence, B. and G.D. Padfield. Flight Testing Simulations of the Wright 1902 Glider and 1903 Flyer. in Annual Conference of the Society of Flight Test Engineers. 2003. Annapolis, Maryland.
3. Lawrence, B. and G.D. Padfield, Handling-Qualities Analysis of the Wright Brothers' 1902 Glider. Journal of Aircraft, 2005. 42(1): p. 224-236.
4. Aviation Safety and Pilot Control: Understanding and Preventing Unfavorable Pilot- Vehicle Interactions. National Research Council. 1997, Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
5. Hamel, P. Rotorcraft-Pilot Coupling, a critical issue for highly augmented helicopters? AGARD CP-592. in Symposium on Advances in Rotorcraft Technology. 1996. Ottowa.
6. Dieterich, O., et al., Adverse Rotorcraft-Pilot Coupling: Recent Research Activities in Europe, in 34th European Rotorcraft Forum. 2008: Liverpool, UK.
7. Pavel, M.D., et al., Adverse Rotorcraft-Pilot Couplings - Prediction and Suppression of Rigid Body RPC. Sketches from the work of GARTEUR HC(AG16), in 34th European Rotorcraft Forum. 2008: Liverpool, UK.
8. Serafini, J., et al., Aeroelastic and Biodynamic Modelling for Stability Analysis of Rotorcraft-Pilot Coupling Phenomena, in 34th European Rotorcraft Forum. 2008: Liverpool, UK.
9. Mattaboni, M., et al., Biomechanical pilot properties identification by inverse kinematics/inverse dynamics multibody analysis, in 26th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences. 2008: Anchorage, Alaska, USA.
10. Padfield, G.D. and M.D. White, Flight simulation in academia; HELIFLIGHT in its first year of operation. The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, September 2003. 107(1075): p. 529-538.
11. White, M.D. and G.D. Padfield, Flight Simulation in Academia. Progress with HELIFLIGHT at the University of Liverpool, in Flight Simulation 1929-2029: A Centennial Perspective. 2004: RAeS, London, UK.
12. Anon, FLIGHTLAB Theory Manual (Vol. One). March 2004, Advanced Rotorcraft Technology: Mountain View, California.
13. Padfield, G.D., et al., Validation Criteria for Helicopter Real-time Simulation Models: Sketches from the work of GARTEUR HC-AG12, in 30th European Rotorcraft Forum. 2004: Marseilles, France.
14. Anon., Aeronautical Design Standard Performance Specification. Handling Qualities Requirements for Military Rotorcraft. 21 March 2000, United States Army Aviation and Missile Command, Aviation Engineering Directorate.
15. Mehl, H.J., et al., PIO Experimental Evaluation of a Highly Augmented Aircraft. December 2001, GARTEUR FM(AG-12) Technical Report TP-120-08.
16. Hess, R.A., Unified theory for aircraft handling qualities and adverse pilot coupling. Journal of Guidance, Dynamics and Control, 1997. 20(6).
17. Mayo, J.R. The involuntary participation of a human pilot in a helicopter collective control loop. in 15th European Rotorcraft Forum. 1989. Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
18. Anon., Guide to the Motionbase motion cueing algorithms. 2000, Motionbase (Holdings) Ltd.