An ensemble approach to sensor fault detection and signal reconstruction for nuclear system control

Annals of Nuclear Energy

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 778-790

  Baraldi, Piero ^a   Cammi, Antonio ^a   Mangili, Francesca ^a   Zio, Enrico ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Control; Local fusion Pressurizer; Random Feature Selection Ensemble; Signal monitoring; Signal reconstruction

Indexed keywords

CONTROL; FAULT DETECTION; PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SIGNAL ANALYSIS; SIGNAL DETECTION; SIGNAL RECONSTRUCTION;

AGGREGATED MODELING; DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATIONS; LOCAL FUSION; RANDOM FEATURE SELECTION ENSEMBLE; SENSOR FAULT DETECTION; SENSOR MEASUREMENTS; SEQUENTIAL PROBABILITY RATIO TEST; SIGNAL MONITORING;

PROCESS CONTROL;

EID: 79952452512     PISSN: 03064549     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2010.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aly, M.A., Atiya, A.F., 2006. Novel methods for the feature subset ensembles approach. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning 6 (4).
2. Baraldi, P., Zio, E., Gola, G., Roverso, D., Hoffmann, M., 2008. Genetic algorithms for signal grouping in sensor validation: A comparison of the filter and wrapper approaches. Journal of Risk and Reliability (JRR), Proceedings of IMechE 222 (Part O), 189-206.
3. Baraldi, P., Zio, E., Gola, G., Roverso, D., Hoffmann, M., 2009. A procedure for the reconstruction of faulty signals by means of an ensemble of regression models based on principal components analysis, NPIC-HMIT 2009 Topical Meeting, April 5-9.
4. Baraldi, P., Cammi, A., Mangili, F., Zio, E., 2010. Local fusion of an ensemble of models for the reconstruction of faulty signals. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 57 (2).
5. Bonissone, P.P., Xue, F., Subbu, R., 2008. Fast meta-models for local fusion of multiple predictive models. Applied Soft Computing Journal. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2008.03.006.
6. Bryll, R., Gutierrez-Osuna, R., Quek, F., 2003. Attribute bagging: Improving accuracy of classifiers ensembles by using random feature subsets. Pattern Recognition 36, 1291-1302. (Pubitemid 36225868)
7. Chenggang, Y., Bingjing, S., 2006. Eliminating false alarms caused by fault propagation in signal validation by sub-grouping. Progress in Nuclear Energy 48 (4), 371-379.
8. Chevalier, R., Provost, D., Seraoui, R., 2009. Assessment of statistical and classification models for monitoring EDF's assets, NPIC-HMIT 2009 Topical Meeting, April 5-9.
9. Diamantaras, K.I., Kung, S.Y., 1996. Principal Component Neural Networks: Theory and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
10. Fantoni, P.F., Mazzola, A., 1996. Multiple-failure signal validation in nuclear power plants using artificial neural networks. Nuclear technology 113 (3), 368-374. (Pubitemid 126540134)
11. Fantoni, P.F., Figedy, S., Papin, B., 1997. A Neuro-Fuzzy Model Applied to Full Range Signal Validation of PWR Nuclear Power Plant Data, Second OECD Specialist Meeting on Operator Aids for Severe Accident Management (SAMOA-2), Lion, France, September 8-10.
12. Fantoni, P.F., Hoffmann, M., Shankar, R., Davis, E.L., 2003. On-line monitoring of instrument channel performance in nuclear power plant using PEANO. Progress in Nuclear Energy 43 (1-4), 83-89.
13. Gross, K.C., Kumenik, K.E., 1991. Sequential probability ratio test for nuclear power plant component surveillance. Nuclear Technology 93, 131-137.
14. Hashemian, H.M., 2004. Sensor Performance and Reliability, ISA.
15. Hashemian, H.M., 2006. Maintenence of Process Instrumentation in Nuclear Power Plants. Springer.
16. Hoffmann, M., 2006. Signal grouping algorithm for an improved on-line calibration monitoring system. In: Proceedings of FLINS, Genova, Italy, August 2006.
17. Holbert, K.E., Upadhyaya, B.R., 1990. An integrated signal validation for nuclear power plants. Nuclear Technology 92 (3), 411-427.
18. Johnson, F., 2008. Nuclear Reactor Controls and Instrumentation. Wexford College Press.
19. Jolliffe, I.T., 2002. Principal Component Analysis. Springer Eds..
20. Kuridan, R.M., Beynon, T.D., 1998. A linearized non steady model for the pressurizer of the safe integral reactor concept. Progress in Nuclear Energy 33.
21. Moore, B., 1981. Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 26 (1).
22. Roverso, D., Hoffmann, M., Zio, E., Baraldi, P., Gola, G., 2007. Solutions for plant-wide on-line calibration monitoring. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2007, Stavanger, Norway, vol. 1, pp. 827-832.
23. Scholkopf, B., Smola, A., Muller, K.R., 1999. Kernel principal component analysis. Advances in Kernel Methods-Support Vector Learning.
24. Todreas, N., Kazimi, M.S., 1990. Nuclear Systems 1. Taylor & Francis.
25. Wald, A., 1947. Sequential Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
26. Yang, H.Y., Lee, S.H., Na, M.G., 2009. Monitoring and uncertainty analysis of feedwater flow rate using data-based modeling method. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 56 (4), 2426-2433.
27. Zio, E., Baraldi, P., Gola, G., Roverso, D., Hoffmann, M., 2007. Genetic algorithms for grouping of signals for system monitoring and diagnostics. In: Proceedings of ESREL 2007, Stavanger, Norway, vol. 1. 833-840.