Multi-objective optimal PMU placement using a non-dominated sorting differential evolution algorithm

International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 886-892

  Peng, Chunhua ^a   Sun, Huijuan ^a   Guo, Jianfeng ^a  

^a EAST CHINA JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Differential evolution; Multi objective optimization; N 1 reliability; Non dominated sorting; PMU placement

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEM MEASUREMENT; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; OBSERVABILITY; OPTIMIZATION; PHASOR MEASUREMENT UNITS; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; UNITS OF MEASUREMENT;

DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION ALGORITHMS; MEASUREMENT RELIABILITIES; N - 1 RELIABILITIES; NETWORK OBSERVABILITY; NON-DOMINATED SORTING; PMU PLACEMENT; WIDE- AREA MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS (WAMS);

EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS;

EID: 79952452130     PISSN: 01420615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.01.024     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Milosevic B, Begovic M. Voltage-stability protection and control using a widearea network of phasor measurement. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2003;18(1):121-7.
2. Bttrnel RO, Butts MM, Sterlirm PS. Power system applications for phasor measurement units. IEEE Comput Appl Power 1994;7:8-13.
3. Bi TS, Qin XH, Yang QX. A novel hybrid state estimator for including synchronized phasor measurements. Electric Power Syst Res 2008;78(8):1343-52.
4. Baldwin TL, Mill L, Boisen MB, et al. Power system observability with minimal phasor measurement placement. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1993;8(2):707-15.
5. Peng Jiangnan, Sun Yuanzhang, Wang HF. Optimal PMU placement for full network observability using Tabu search algorithm. Int J Electric Power Energy Syst 2006;28(4):223-31.
6. Xu Bei, Abur A. Observability Analysis and Measurement Placement for Systems with PMUs. In: Proceedings of the IEEE PES power systems conference and exposition. vol. 2; 2004. p. 943-6.
7. Milosevic B, Begovic M. Nondominated sorting genetic algorithm for optimal phasor measurement placement. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2003;18(1):69-75.
8. Monticelli A, Wu FF. Network observability theory. IEEE Trans Power Apparat Syst 1985;4(5):1042-8.
9. Zitzler E, Thiele L. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 1999;3(4):257-71.
10. Srinivas N, Deb K. Multi-objective function optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms. Evolut Comput 1995;2(3):221-48.
11. Mitra K, Gopinath R. Multi-objective optimization of an industrial grinding operation using elitist nondominated sorting genetic algorithm. Chem Eng Sci 2004;59(2):385-96.
12. Sarkar D, Modak JM. Pareto-optimal solutions for multi-objective optimization of fed-batch bioreactors using nondominated sorting genetic algorithm. Chem Eng Sci 2005;60(2):481-92.
13. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al. A fast and elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evolut Comput 2002;6(2):182-97.
14. Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution - a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous space. Global Optim 1997;11(4):341-59.
15. Vesterstrom J, Thomsen R. A comparative study of differential evolution, particle swarm optimization,and evolutionary algorithms on numerical benchmark problems. In: Proceedings of the 2004 congress on evolutionary computation, vol. 2. Piscataway (NJ, USA): IEEE; 2004. p. 1980-7.
16. Storn Rainer. Designing nonstandard filters with differential evolution. IEEE Signal Proc Mag 2005;22(1):103-6.
17. Paterlini Sandra, Krink Thiemo. Differential evolution and particle swarm optimisation in partitional clustering. Comput Stat Data Anal 2006;50(5): 1220-47.
18. Farina M, Amato P. A fuzzy definition of "optimality" for many-criteria optimization problems. IEEE Trans Syst,ManCybern, PartA 2004;34(3):315-26.