Bayesian analysis of hybridization and introgression between the endangered european mink (Mustela lutreola) and the polecat (Mustela putorius)

Molecular Ecology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 1176-1190

  Cabria, M T ^a,b   Michaux, J R ^b,c   Gomez Moliner B J ^a   Skumatov, D ^d   Maran, T ^e,f   Fournier, P ^g   Lopez De Luzuriaga J ^h   Zardoya, R ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^c CENTRE DE BIOLOGIE ET DE GESTION DES POPULATIONS   (France)

^d Federal Agency of the Scientific Organizations   (Russian Federation)

^e Species Conservation Lab   (Estonia)

^f TALLINN UNIVERSITY   (Estonia)

^g Groupe de Recherche et d'Etudes Pour la Gestion de l'Environnement (GREGE)   (France)

^h CSIC ^*  (Spain)

ⁱ MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bayesian methods; hybridization; introgression; microsatellites; mtDNA; Y chromosome

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; FEMALE; FERRET; GENETICS; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; MINK; MOLECULAR GENETICS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYSIOLOGY; Y CHROMOSOME;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; FEMALE; FERRETS; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; MINK; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; Y CHROMOSOME;

MUSTELA; MUSTELA LUTREOLA; MUSTELA PUTORIUS; MUSTELIDAE;

EID: 79952447873     PISSN: 09621083     EISSN: 1365294X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04988.x     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Adams JR, Lucash C, Schutte L, Waits LP, (2007) Locating hybrid individuals in the red wolf (Canis rufus) experimental population area using a spatially targeted sampling strategy and faecal DNA genotyping. Molecular Ecology, 16, 1823-1834. (Pubitemid 46639973)
2. Allendorf FW, Luikart G, (2007) Conservation and the genetics of populations, Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.
3. Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK, (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 613-622. (Pubitemid 32947021)
4. Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Hitt NP, Knudsen KL, Lundquist LL, Spruell P, (2004) Intercrosses and the U.S. endangered species act: should hybridized populations be included as westslope cutthroat trout? Conservation Biology, 18, 1203-1213. (Pubitemid 39348572)
5. Anderson EC, Thompson EA, (2002) A model-based method for identifying species hybrids using multilocus genetic data. Genetics, 160, 1217-1229. (Pubitemid 34263481)
6. Arnold ML, (1992) Natural hybridization as an evolutionary process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 23, 237-261. (Pubitemid 24412249)
7. Barton NH, (2001) The role of hybridization in evolution. Molecular Ecology, 10, 551-568. (Pubitemid 32406342)
8. Beaumont M, Barratt EM, Gottelli D, et al. (2001) Genetic diversity and introgression in the Scottish wildcat. Molecular Ecology, 10, 319-336. (Pubitemid 32232340)
9. Belkhir K, Borsa P, Chikhi L, Raufaste N, Bonhomme F, (2000) genetix 4.02, Logiciel sous windows pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier, France.
10. Birks J, (1995) Recovery of the European polecat (Mustela putorius) in Britain. Small Carnivore Conservation, 12, 9.
11. Cabria MT, González EG, Gõmez-Moliner BJ, Zardoya R, (2007) Microsatellite markers for the endangered European mink (Mustela lutreola) and closely related mustelids. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 1185-1188. (Pubitemid 350064168)
12. Chapuis MP, Estoup A, (2007) Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 24, 621-631. (Pubitemid 46355787)
13. Coyne JA, Allen Orr H, (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA.
14. Davison A, Birks JDS, Griffiths HI, et al. (1999) Hybridization and the phylogenetic relationship between polecats and domestic ferrets in Britain. Biological Conservation, 87, 155-161. (Pubitemid 28564233)
15. Davison A, Birks JDS, Maran T, et al. (2000a) Conservation implications of hybridisation between polecats, ferrets and European mink (Mustela spp.). In: Mustelids in a Modern World. Management and Conservation Aspects of Small Carnivore: Human Interactions (ed., Griffiths HI,), pp. 153-162. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.
16. Davison A, Griffiths HI, Brookes RC, et al. (2000b) Mitochondrial DNA and palaeontological evidence for the origins of endangered European mink, Mustela lutreola. Animal Conservation, 3, 345-355.
17. Dowling TE, Secor CL, (1997) The role of hybridization and introgression in the diversification of animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 28, 593-619. (Pubitemid 28012305)
18. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J, (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14, 2611-2620. (Pubitemid 40886055)
19. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S, (2005) arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online, 1, 47-50.
20. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK, (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics, 164, 1567-1587. (Pubitemid 37102217)
21. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK, (2007) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 574-578. (Pubitemid 47035522)
22. Fernandes M, Maran T, Tikhonov A, et al. (2008) Mustela putorius. IUCN 2010. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, Version 2010.4.
23. Fleming MA, Ostrander EA, Cook JA, (1999) Microsatellite markers for American mink (Mustela vison) and ermine (Mustela erminea). Molecular Ecology, 8, 1352-1354. (Pubitemid 29390571)
24. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA, (2002) Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambrige University Press, UK.
25. Gaubert P, Taylor PJ, Fernandes CA, Bruford MW, Veron G, (2005) Patterns of cryptic hybridization revealed using an integrative approach: a case study on genets (Carnivora, Viverridae, Genetta spp.) from the southern African subregion. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 86, 11-33. (Pubitemid 41312483)
26. Gõmez-Moliner BJ, Cabria MT, Rubines J, et al. (2004) PCR-RFLP identification of mustelid species: European mink (Mustela lutreola), American mink (M. vison) and polecat (M. putorius) by analysis of excremental DNA. Journal of Zoology of London, 262, 311-316. (Pubitemid 38319250)
27. Goudet J, (1995) fstat (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity, 86, 485-486.
28. Gow J, Peichel CL, Taylor EB, (2006) Contrasting hybridization rates between sympatric three-spined sticklebacks highlight the fragility of reproductive barriers between evolutionarily young species. Molecular Ecology, 15, 739-752. (Pubitemid 43344790)
29. Guo SW, Thompson EA, (1992) Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics, 48, 361-372.
30. Hellborg L, Ellegren H, (2003) Y chromosome conserved anchored tagged sequences (YCATS) for the analysis of mammalian male-specific DNA. Molecular Ecology, 12, 283-291. (Pubitemid 36108124)
31. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist FR, (2001) mrbayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics, 17, 754-755.
32. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist FR, Nielsen R, Bollback JP, (2001) Bayesian inference of phylogeny and its impact on evolutionary biology. Science, 294, 2310-2314. (Pubitemid 33140548)
33. Kaeuffer R, Reale D, Coltman DW, Pontier D, (2007) Detecting population structure using STRUCTURE software: effect of background linkage disequilibrium. Heredity, 99, 374-380. (Pubitemid 47482635)
34. Kidd AG, Bowman J, Lesbarrères D, Schulte-Hostedde I, (2009) Hybridization between escaped domestic and wild American mink (Neovison vison). Molecular Ecology, 18, 1175-1186.
35. Kingston JJ, Gwilliam J, (2007) Hybridisation between two sympatrically breeding species of fur seal at Îles Crozet. Conservation Genetics, 8, 1133-1145. (Pubitemid 47174994)
36. Lodé T, Guiral G, Peltier D, (2005) European mink-polecat hybridization events: hazards from natural process? Journal of Heredity, 96, 89-96. (Pubitemid 40261870)
37. Lynch JM, (1995) Conservation implications of hybridisation between mustelids and their domesticated counterparts: the example of polecats and feral ferrets in Britain. Small Carnivore Conservation, 13, 17-18.
38. Maran T, (2007) Conservation biology of the European mink, Mustela lutreola (Linnaeus 1761): decline and causes of extinction. Tallinn University Dissertations on Natural Sciences 15, Tallinn, Estonia.
39. Maran T, Henttonen H, (1995) Why is the European mink (Mustela lutreola) disappearing-a review of the process and hypotheses. Annales Zoologici Fennici, 32, 47-54. (Pubitemid 26450460)
40. Maran T, Macdonald DW, Kruuk H, Sidorovich VE, Rozhnov VV, (1998) The continuing decline of the European mink Mustela lutreola: evidence for the intraguild aggression hypothesis. In: Behaviour and Ecology of Riparian Mammals (eds, Dunstone N, Gorman M,), pp. 297-324. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
41. Michaux JR, Libois R, Davison A, Chevret P, Rosoux R, (2004) Is the western population of the European mink (Mustela lutreola), a distinct Management Unit for conservation? Biological Conservation, 115, 357-367. (Pubitemid 37358488)
42. Michaux JR, Hardy OJ, Justy F, et al. (2005) Conservation genetics and population history of the threatened European mink Mustela lutreola, with an emphasis on the west European population. Molecular Ecology, 14, 2373-2388. (Pubitemid 40886038)
43. Nielsen EE, Bach LA, Kotlicki P, (2006) hybridlab (version 1.0): a program for generating simulated hybrids from population samples. Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 971-973. (Pubitemid 44807917)
44. Norén K, Kvaloy K, Nyström V, et al. (2009) Farmed arctic foxes on the Fennoscandian mountain tundra: implications for conservation. Animal Conservation, 12, 434-444.
45. Oliveira R, Godinho R, Randi E, Ferrand N, Célio Alves P, (2008) Molecular analysis of hybridisation between wild and domestic cat (Felis silvestris) in Portugal: implications for conservation. Conservation Genetics, 9, 1-11.
46. Palazõn SP, Ruiz-Olmo J, Ceña A, Ceña A, Gosálbez J, Gõmez-Gayubo A, (2003) Trends in distribution of the European mink (Mustela lutreola L., 1761) in Spain: 1950-1999. Mammalia, 67, 473-484. (Pubitemid 38504203)
47. Pastorini J, Zaramody A, Curtis DJ, Nievergelt CM, Mundy NI, (2009) Genetic analysis of hybridization and introgression between wild mongoose and brown lemurs. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 9, 32-44.
48. Pertoldi C, Breyne P, Cabria MT, et al. (2006) Genetic structure of the European polecat (Mustela putorius) and its implication for conservation strategies. Journal of Zoology, 270, 102-115.
49. Posada D, Crandall KA, (1998) modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics, 14, 817-818. (Pubitemid 28552116)
50. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P, (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945-959. (Pubitemid 30397141)
51. Raymond M, Rousset F, (1995) genepop (version 1.2)-population-genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity, 86, 248-249.
52. Rhymer JM, Simberloff D, (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 27, 83-109.
53. Rice WR, (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43, 223-225.
54. Ronquist FR, Huelsenbeck JP, (2003) MrBayes3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics, 19, 1572-1574. (Pubitemid 37038874)
55. Rosenberg NA, (2004) distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 137-138. (Pubitemid 38261335)
56. Rozhnov VV, (1993) Extinction of the European mink: ecological catastrophe or a natural process? Lutreola, 1, 10-16.
57. Schneider S, Roessli D, Excoffier L, (2000) arlequin, Version 2.001: A Software for Population Genetics Data Analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Geneva.
58. Sidorovich VE, (2001) Findings on the ecology of hybrids between the European mink Mustela lutreola and polecat M. putorius at the Lovat upper reaches, NE Belarus. Small Carnivore Conservation, 24, 1-5.
59. Ternovsky DV, (1977) Biology of Mustelids (Mustelidae). Nauka Publication, Novosibirsk.
60. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin J, Higgins DG, (1997) The clustal-x windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research, 25, 4876-4882.
61. Vähä J-P, Primmer CR, (2006) Efficiency of model based Bayesian methods for detecting hybrid individuals under different hybridization scenarios and with different number of loci. Molecular Ecology, 15, 63-72.
62. Väli U, Dombrovski V, Treinys R, et al. (2010) Widespread hybridization between the Greater Spotted Eagle Aquila clanga and the Lesser Spotted Eagle Aquila pomarina (Aves: Accipitriformes) in Europe. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 100, 725-736.
63. Valiere N, (2002) gimlet: a computer program for analysing genetic individual identification data. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2, 377-379.
64. Vallender R, Robertson RJ, Friesen VL, Lovette IJ, (2007) Complex hybridization dynamics between golden-winged and blue-winged warblers (Vermivora chrysoptera and Vermivora pinus) revealed by AFLP, microsatellite, intron and mtDNA markers. Molecular Ecology, 16, 2017-2029. (Pubitemid 46718918)
65. Verardi A, Lucchini V, Randi E, (2006) Detecting introgressive hybridization between free-ranging domestic dogs and wild wolves (Canis lupus) by admixture linkage disequilibrium analysis. Molecular Ecology, 15, 2845-2855. (Pubitemid 44215458)
66. Vila C, Walker C, Sundqvist AK, et al. (2003) Combined use of maternal, paternal and bi-parental genetic markers for the identification of wolf-dog hybrids. Heredity, 90, 17-24. (Pubitemid 36251119)
67. Weir BS, Cockerham CC, (1984) Estimation F-statistics for the analysis of population-structure. Evolution, 38, 1358-1370.
68. Zabala J, Zuberogoitia I, (2003) Current and historical distribution of European mink (Mustela lutreola) in Biscay. Evolution and comments on the results. Small Carnivore Conservation, 28, 4-6.