Crash avoidance potential of four passenger vehicle technologies

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 732-740

  Jermakian, Jessica S ^a  

^a Insurance Institute for Highway Safety ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Active safety; Crash avoidance technology; Crash risk; FARS; GES

Indexed keywords

ACTIVE SAFETY; CRASH AVOIDANCE; CRASH RISK; FARS; GES;

ESTIMATION; HEADLIGHTS; HIGHWAY ACCIDENTS; VEHICLES;

TECHNOLOGY;

ACCELERATION; ARTICLE; CAR; CAUSE OF DEATH; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INJURY; INJURY SCALE; MORTALITY; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; RISK FACTOR; STANDARD; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; UNITED STATES;

ACCELERATION; ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; AUTOMOBILES; CAUSE OF DEATH; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; ENVIRONMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INJURY SEVERITY SCORE; PROTECTIVE DEVICES; RISK FACTORS; RISK-TAKING; UNITED STATES; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 79952438181     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.10.020     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. J. Abele, C. Kerlen, S. Krueger, H. Baum, T. Geissler, S. Grawenhoff, J. Schneider, and W. Schulz Exploratory Study on the Potential Socio-economic Impact of the Introduction of Intelligent Safety Systems in Road Vehicles (SeiSS Final Report) 2005 VDI/VDE Innovation + Technik GmbH Teltow, Germany
2. K.A. Braitman, A.T. McCartt, D.S. Zuby, and J. Singer Volvo and Infiniti Drivers' Experiences with Select Crash Avoidance Technologies 2009 Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Arlington, VA
3. Campbell, J.L.; Richard, C.M.; Brown, J.L.; McCallum, M.; 2007. Crash Warning System Interfaces: Human Factors Insights and Lessons Learned. Report No. DOT HS-810-697. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
4. Coelingh, E.; Jakobsson, L.; Lind, H.; Lindman, M.; 2007. Collision warning with autobrake - a real-life safety perspective. Paper no. 07-0450. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
5. Corkle, J.; Marti, M.; Montebello, D.; 2001. Synthesis on the Effectiveness of Rumble Strips. Report no. MN/RC-2002-07. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, MN.
6. C.M. Farmer Effects of Electronic Stability Control on Fatal Crash Risk 2010 Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Arlington, VA
7. C.M. Farmer Crash Avoidance Potential of Five Vehicle Technologies 2008 Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Arlington, VA
8. C.M. Farmer, and A.K. Lund Trends over time in the risk of driver death: what if vehicle designs had not improved? Traffic Injury Prevention 7 4 2006 335 342
9. V. Kallberg Reflector posts - signs of danger? Transportation Research Record 1403 1993 57 66
10. Kuehn, M.; Hummel, T.; Bende, J.; 2009. Benefit estimation of advanced driver assistance systems for cars derived from real-life accidents. Paper no. 09-0317. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
11. LeBlanc, D.; Sayer, J.; Winkler, C.; Ervin, R.; Bogard, S.; Devonshire, J.; Mefford, M.; Hagan, M.; Bareket, Z.; Goodsell, R.; Gordon, T.; 2006. Road Departure Crash Warning System Field Operational Test: Methodology and Results. Report no. UMTRI-2006-9-1. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute, Ann Arbor.
12. Najm, W.G.; Stearns, M.D.; Howarth, H.; Koopman, J.; Hitz, J.; 2006. Evaluation of an Automotive Rear-End Collision Avoidance System. Report no. DOT HS-810-569. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
13. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2008. Traffic Safety Facts 2007. Report no. DOT HS-811-002. US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC.
14. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Benefits Working Group Preliminary Assessment of Crash Avoidance Systems Benefits 1996 US Department of Transportation Washington, DC
15. Outcalt, W.; 2001. Centerline Rumble Strips. Report no. CDOT-DTD-R-2001-8. Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, CO.
16. Pomerleau, D.; Jochem, T.; Thorpe, C.; Batavia, P.; Pape, D.; Hadden, J.; McMillan, N.; Brown, N.; Everson, J.; 1999. Run-Off-Road Collision Avoidance Using IVHS Countermeasures. Report no. DOT HS-809-170. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
17. B.N. Persaud, R.A. Retting, and C.A. Lyon Crash reduction following installation of centerline rumble strips on rural two-lane roads Accident Analysis and Prevention 36 6 2004 1073 1079
18. Schittenhelm, H.; 2009. The Vision of Accident Free Driving - How Efficient Are We Actually in Avoiding or Mitigating Longitudinal Real World Accidents. Paper no. 09-0510. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
19. Sugimoto, Y.; Sauer, C.; 2005. Effectiveness Estimation for Advanced Driver Assistance System and its Application to Collision Mitigation Brake System. Paper no. 05-0148. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
20. Wilson, B.H.; Stearns, M.D.; Koopmann, J.; Yang, C.Y.; 2007. Evaluation of a Road-Departure Crash Warning System. Report no. DOT-HS-810-854. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.
21. P.L. Zador, H.S. Stein, P.H. Wright, and J.W. Hall Effects of chevrons, post-mounted delineators, and raised pavement markers on driver behavior at roadway curves Transportation Research Record 1114 1987 1 10