Joining up government by integrating funding streams? The experiences of the individual budget pilot projects for older and disabled people in England

International Journal of Public Administration

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 232-243

  Moran, Nicola ^a   Glendinning, Caroline ^a   Stevens, Martin ^b   Manthorpe, Jill ^b   Jacobs, Sally ^c   Wilber force, Mark ^c   Knapp, Martin ^d   Challis, David ^c   Fernández, Jose Luis ^d   Jones, Karen ^e   Netten, Ann ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cash for care; Funding streams; Individual budgets; Joined up government

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952418421     PISSN: 01900692     EISSN: 15324265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2010.540701     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Baker, K. (2009). Contribution of the not for profit sector: Submission to the Productivity Commission. Canberra, Australia: National Disability Services.
2. Blackstone, T., & Plowden, W. (1988). Inside the think tank. London: William Heinemann.
3. Boxall, K., Dowson, S., & Beresford, P. (2009). Selling individual budgets, choice and control: Local and global influences on UK social care policy for people with learning difficulties. Policy & Politics, 37(4), 499-515.
4. CabinetOffice. (2000). Wiring it up: Whitehall'smanagementof cross-cutting policies and services. London: Performance and Innovation Unit.
5. Davies, J S. (2009). The limits of joined-up government: Towards a political analysis. Public Administration, 87(1), 80-96.
6. Department for Communities and Local Government. (Feb 2008). Disabled Facilities Grant-The package of changes to modernise the programme. London: Department of Communities and Local Government.
7. Department for Work and Pensions. (2008). Raising Expectations and Increasing Support: Reforming Welfare for the Future. London: Department forWork and Pensions. Retrieved September 10, 2010, from http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/fullversion.pdf.
8. Department of Health. (2005). Independence, well-being and choice: Our vision for the future of adult social care. London: Department of Health.
9. Department of Health. (2007a). Putting people first. A shared vision and commitment to the transformation of adult social care. London: Department of Health.
10. Department of Health. (2007b). Our NHS, Our Future; NHS Next Stage Review (interim report). London: Department of Health.
11. Department of Health. (2009). Understanding personal health budgets. London: Department of Health.
12. Duffy, S. (2004). In control. Journal of Integrated Care, 12(6), 7-13.
13. Flinders, M. (2002). Governance in Whitehall. Public Administration, 80(1), 51-75.
14. Gash, T., Hallsworth, M., Ismail, S., & Paun, A. (2008). Performance art: Enabling better management of public services. London: Institute for Government.
15. Glasby, J., & Littlechild, R. (2009). Direct payments and personal budgets: Putting personalisation into practice. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
16. Glendinning, C. (2008). Increasing choice and control for older and disabled people: A critical review of new developments in England. Social Policy and Administration, 42(5), 451-69.
17. Glendinning, C., Challis, D., Fernández, J.-L., Jacobs, S., Jones, K., Knapp, M., et al. (2008). Evaluation of the Individual Budgets Pilot Programme: Final Report. York, UK: Social Policy Research Unit, University of York. Retrieved September 10, 2010, from http://php.york.ac.uk/inst/spru/pubs/1119/.
18. Glendinning, C., Hudson, B., Hardy, B., & Young, R. (2004). The Health Act 1999 section 31 partnership 'flexibilities'. In J. Glasby & E. Peck (Eds.), Care trusts: Partnership working in action. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press.
19. Glendinning, C., Hudson, B., & Means, R. (2005). Under strain? Exploring the troubled relationship between health and social care. Public Money and Management, 25(4), 245-52.
20. Glendinning, C., Powell, M., & Rummery, K. (2002). Partnerships, New Labor and the governance of welfare. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
21. Greer, S., & Jarman, H. (2007). The Department of Health and the Civil Service. London: The Nuffield Trust.
22. Hardy, B., Mur-Veemanu, I., Steenbergen, M., & Wistow, G. (1999). Interagency services in England and The Netherlands-A comparative study of integrated care development and delivery. Health Policy, 48(2), 87-105.
23. Henwood, M., & Hudson, B. (2007). Review of the Independent Living Funds. London: Department for Work and Pensions.
24. Henwood, M., & Hudson, B. (2008). Individual budgets and personalisation: A new model for integration? Journal of Integrated Care, 16(3), 8-16.
25. Her Majesty's Government. (2005). Opportunity age. Meeting the challenges of ageing in the 21st century. London: Department for Work and Pensions.
26. Hultberg, E-L., Glendinning, C., Allebeck, P., & Knut, L. (2005). Using pooled budgets to integrate health and welfare services: A comparison of experiments in England and Sweden. Health and Social Care in the Community, 13(6), 531-541.
27. Independent Living Fund. (no date). What Is the ILF? Independent Living Funds. Retrieved March 7, 2010, from http://www.ilf.org.uk/about_the_ilf/what/index.html.
28. Independent Living Fund. (2006). Pilot Protocol Version 1. Strategic Policy Directorate, Independent Living Funds, Nottingham, March 2006. Retrieved September 10, 2010, from http://networks.csip.org.uk/_library/Resources/Personalisation/Personalisation_advice/ILF_Protocol_1_March_2006.pdf.
29. Institute for Government. (2008). Government Must Take Action to End Turf Wars in Westminster and Whitehall. London: Institute for Government, November 26, 2008. Retrieved September 10, 2010, from http://www.institute-forgovernment.org.uk/.news/article/6/governmentmust-take-action-to-end-turf-wars-in-westminster-and-whitehall
30. Jensen, J., & Jacobzone, S. (2000). Care Allowances for the Frail Elderly and their Impact onWomen Care-Givers. DEELSA/ELSA/WD(2000)2. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
31. Kreimer, M. (2006). Developments in Austrian care arrangements. In C. Glendinning, & P.A. Kemp (Eds.), Cash and care: Policy challenges in the welfare state (pp.141-153). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
32. Leece, J., & Bornat, J. (Eds.). (2006). Developments in direct payments. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
33. Mansell, J.L, Beadle-Brown, J., Skidmore, C., Whelton, B., & Hutchinson, A. (2006). People with learning disabilities in 'out-of-area' residential placements: 1. Policy context. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50(11), 837-844.
34. Moore, J., & Keen, J. (2007). Accounting for joined-up government: The case of intermediate Care. Public Money & Management, 27(1), 61-68.
35. National Health Service. (2009). Primary Care & Community Services: Personal Health Budgets: First Steps. London: Department of Health. Retrieved September 10, 2010, from http://www.healthskillseast.org.uk/upload/documents/Personalisation_next_steps.pdf.
36. Office for Disability Issues. (2009). Right to control: A guide for local delivery agencies. London: Office for Disability Issues.
37. Page, E. C. (2003). The civil servant as legislator: Law making in British administration. Public Administration, 81(4), 651-679.
38. Page, E. C., & Jenkins, B. (2005). Policy bureaucracy: Government with a cast of thousands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
39. Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: Sage.
40. Pollitt, C. (2003). Joined-up government: A survey. Political Studies Review, 1(1), 34-49.
41. Prime Minister's Strategy Unit. (2005). Improving the life chances of disabled people. London: Cabinet Office.
42. Samuel, M. (2009). Minister defends second set of 'individual budget' pilots. Community Care, June18, 2009, 7.
43. Timonen, V., Convery, J., & Cahill, S. (2006). Care revolutions in the making? A comparison of cash for care programs in four European Countries. Ageing and Society, 26(3), 455-74.
44. Ungerson, C., & Yeandle, S. (Eds.). (2007). Cash for care in developed welfare states. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
45. Waters, J., & Duffy, S. (2007). Individual Budget Integration: An Exploration of the Possible Scope of Individual Budgets. Report for the Department of Health. London: In Control. Retrieved Oct. 15, 2008, from http://networks.csip.org.uk/library/resources/personalisation.
46. Wiener, J., Tilly, J., & Cuellar, A.E. (2003). Consumer-directed home care in the Netherlands, England and Germany. Washington, DC: AARP Public Policy Institute.