Non-linear mixed-effects modeling for photosynthetic response of Rosa hybrida L. under elevated CO2in greenhouses - Short communication

Horticultural Science

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 43-47

  Ozturk, I ^a   Ottosen, C O ^a   Ritz, C ^b   Streibig, J C ^c  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Carbon assimilation; Irradiance; Miniature rose; Response curve

Indexed keywords

ROSA HYBRID CULTIVAR;

EID: 79952416341     PISSN: 0862867X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.17221/97/2010-hortsci     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. 2enrichment and light. Journal of Horticultural Science, 71:945-956.
2. BARMAN T.S., BARUAH U., SAIKIA J.K., 2008. Irradiance influences tea leaf (Camellia sinensis L.) photosynthesis and transpiration. Photosynthetica, 46: 618-621.
3. CALATAYUD A., ROCA D., GORBE E., MARTINEZ P.F., 2007. Light acclimation in rose (Rosa hybrida cv. Grand Gala) leaves after pruning: Effects on chlorophyll a fluorescence, nitrate reductase, ammonium and carbohydrates. Scientia Horticulturae, 111: 152-159.
4. 2 concentration. Plant Physiology, 59: 86-90.
5. FANG Z.X., BAILEY R.L., 2001. Nonlinear mixed effects modeling for slash pine dominant height growth following intensive silvicultural treatments. Forest Science, 47: 287-300.
6. GONZALEZ-REAL M.M., BAILLE A., 2000. Changes in leaf photosynthetic parameters with leaf position and nitrogen content within a rose plant canopy (Rosa hybrida). Plant Cell and Environment, 23: 351-363.
7. HESCHEL M.S., STINCHCOMBE J.R., HOLSINGER K.E., SCHMITT J., 2004. Natural selection on light response curve parameters in the herbaceous annual, Impatiens capensis. Oecologia, 139:487-494.
8. 2 exchange in roses. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 71: 245-252.
9. KIM S.H., LIETH J.H., 2003. A coupled model of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration for a rose leaf (Rosa hybrida L.). Annals of Botany, 91: 771-781.
10. LE ROUX X., GRAND S., DREYER E., DAUDET F.A., 1999. Parameterization and testing of a biochemically based photosynthesis model for walnut (Juglans regia) trees and seedlings. Tree Physiology, 19: 481-492.
11. MATLOOBI M., EBRAHIMZADEH A., KHALIGI A., HASAN-DOKHT M., 2009. Training system affects whole canopy photosynthesis of the greenhouse roses (Rosa hybrida 'Habari'). Journal of Food Agriculture & Environment, 7: 114-117.
12. MOON J.W., FLORE J.A., HANCOCK J.F., 1987. A comparison of carbon and water-vapor gas-exchange characteristics between a diploid and highbush blueberry. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 112: 134-138.
13. NOTHDURFT A., KUBLIN E., LAPPI J., 2006. A non-linear hierarchical mixed model to describe tree height growth. European Journal of Forest Research, 125: 281-289.
14. 4 Plants. Photosynthesis Research, 35: 265-274.
15. OGREN E., SUNDIN U., 1996. Photosynthetic responses to variable light: A comparison of species from contrasting habitats. Oecologia, 106:18-27.
16. OTTOSEN C.O., MENTZ J., 2000. Biomass accumulation and photosynthesis of ornamentals in elevated CO2 conditions. Gartenbauwissenschaft, 65: 35-39.
17. PASIAN C.C., LIETH J.H., 1989. Analysis of the response of net photosynthesis of rose leaves of varying ages to photosynthetically active radiation and temperature. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 114: 581-586.
18. PEARCY R.W, 1990. Sunflecks and photosynthesis in plant canopies. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 41: 421-453.
19. PEEK M.S., RUSSEK-COHEN E., WAIT D.A., FORSETH I.N., 2002. Physiological response curve analysis using nonlinear mixed models. Oecologia, 132: 175-180.
20. PINHEIRO J., BATES D., 2002. Mixed Effects Models in S and S-Plus. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.
21. POORTER H., NIINEMETS U., WALTER A., FIORANI F., SCHURR U., 2010. A method to construct dose-response curves for a wide range of environmental factors and plant traits by means of a meta-analysis of phenotypic data. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61: 2043-2055.
22. POORTER L., 1999. Growth responses of 15 rain-forest tree species to a light gradient: the relative importance of morphological and physiological traits. Functional Ecology, 13: 396-410.
23. R Development Core Team, 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available at: http://www.R-project.org
24. RITZ C., STREIBIG J.C., 2008. Nonlinear Regression with R. New York, Springer-Verlag.
25. SAROUSSI S., BEER S., 2007. Alpha and quantum yield of aquatic plants derived from PAM fluorometry: Uses and misuses. Aquatic Botany, 86: 89-92.
26. SKILLMAN J.B., 2008. Quantum yield variation across the three pathways of photosynthesis: not yet out of the dark. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59: 1647-1661.
27. TIMM H.C., STEGEMANN J., KUPPERS M., 2002. Photosynthetic induction strongly affects the light compensation point of net photosynthesis and coincidentally the apparent quantum yield. Trees-Structure and Function, 16: 47-62.
28. 2 concentration and enhanced UV-B radiation on faba bean. Plant Ecology, 154: 197-210.
29. URBAN O., KOSVANCOVA M., MAREK M.V., LICHTENTHALER H.K., 2007. Induction of photosynthesis and importance of limitations during the induction phase in sun and shade leaves of five ecologically contrasting tree species from the temperate zone. Tree Physiology, 27: 1207-1215.