An empirical assessment of the form of utility functions

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 461-476

  Kirby, Kris N ^a  

^a WILLIAMS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Choice behavior; Decision making; Mathematical modeling; Utility theory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; GAME; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL MODEL; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 79952391676     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0021968     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abdellaoui M., Bleichrodt H., L'Haridon O. A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 2008, 36:245-266. doi: 10.1007/s11166-008-9039-8.
2. Abdellaoui M., Bleichrodt H., Paraschiv C. Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement. Management Science 2007, 53:1659-1674. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0711.
3. Barnett W. The modern theory of consumer behavior: Ordinal or cardinal?. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics 2003, 6:41-65. doi: 10.1007/s12113-003-1012-4.
4. Becker G.M., DeGroot M.H., Marschak J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science 1964, 9:226-232. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830090304.
5. Bernoulli, D. (1954). Exposition of a new theory on the measurement of risk (L. Sommer, Trans.). Econometrica, 22, 23-36. (Original work published 1738) doi: 10.2307/1909829.
6. Birnbaum M.H. Issues in utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1992, 52:319-330. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90024-2.
7. Birnbaum M.H. Causes of Allais common consequence paradoxes: An experimental dissection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2004, 48:87-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2004.01.001.
8. Birnbaum M.H. New tests of cumulative prospect theory and the priority heuristic: Probability-outcome tradeoff with branch splitting. Judgment and Decision Making 2008, 3:304-316.
9. Birnbaum M.H., Stegner S.E. Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge's point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1979, 37:48-74. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.48.
10. Bostic R., Herrnstein R.J., Luce R.D. The effect on the preference-reversal phenomenon of using choice indifferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1990, 13:193-212. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(90)90086-S.
11. Brandstätter E., Gigerenzer G., Hertwig R. The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review 2006, 113:409-432. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.409.
12. Cohen A., Einav L. Estimating risk preferences from deductible choice. American Economic Review 2007, 97:745-788. doi: 10.1257/aer.97.3.745.
13. Coombs C.H., Komorita S.S. Measuring utility of money through decisions. American Journal of Psychology 1958, 71:383-389. doi: 10.2307/1420083.
14. Daniels R.L., Keller L.R. Choice-based assessment of utility functions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1992, 52:524-543. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(92)90031-2.
15. Edwards W. The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin 1954, 51:380-417. doi: 10.1037/h0053870.
16. Edwards W. Subjective probabilities inferred from decisions. Psychological Review 1962, 69:109-135. doi: 10.1037/h0038674.
17. Efron B., Tibshirani R.J. An introduction to the bootstrap 1994, Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York, NY.
18. Farquhar P.H. Utility assessment methods. Management Science 1984, 30:1283-1300. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.30.11.1283.
19. Fechner G.T. Elemente der psychophysik [Elements of psychophysics]. A source book in the history of psychology 1965, 66-75. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, (Original work published 1860). H. Langfield, R.J. Herrnstein, E.G. Boring (Eds.).
20. Fishburn P.C., Kochenberger G.A. Two-piece Von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions. Decision Sciences 1979, 10:503-518. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1979.tb00043.x.
21. Galanter E. The direct measurement of utility and subjective probability. American Journal of Psychology 1962, 75:208-220. doi: 10.2307/1419604.
22. Galanter E. Utility functions for nonmonetary events. American Journal of Psychology 1990, 103:449-470. doi: 10.2307/1423318.
23. Galanter E., Holman G.L. Some invariances of the isosensitivity function and their implications for the utility function of money. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1967, 73:333-339. doi: 10.1037/h0024275.
24. Gallistel C.R., Gibbon J. The symbolic foundations of conditioned behavior 2002, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
25. Hamblin R.L., Clairmont D.H., Chadwick B.A. Utility and gambling decisions: Experiments and equations. Social Science Research 1975, 4:1-15. doi: 10.1016/0049-089X(75)90016-2.
26. Hershey J.C., Kunreuther H.C., Schoemaker P.J.H. Sources of bias in assessment procedures or utility functions. Management Science 1982, 28:936-954. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.28.8.936.
27. Holt C.A., Laury S.K. Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review 2002, 92:1644-1655. doi: 10.1257/000282802762024700.
28. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979, 47:263-291. doi: 10.2307/1914185.
29. Kirby K.N. Bidding on the future: Evidence against normative discounting of delayed rewards. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1997, 126:54-70. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.126.1.54.
30. Kirby K.N., Maraković N.N. Delay-discounting probabilistic rewards: Rates decrease as amounts increase. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1996, 3:100-104.
31. Kornbrot D.E., Donnelly M., Galanter E. Estimates of utility function parameters from signal detection experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7:441-458. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.7.2.441.
32. Luce R.D. Utility of gains and losses: Measurement-theoretical and experimental approaches 2000, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
33. Luce R.D. Interpersonal comparisons of utility for 2 of 3 types of people. Theory and Decision 2010, 68:5-24. doi: 10.1007/s11238-009-9138-2.
34. Luce R.D., Fishburn P.C. Rank- and sign-dependent linear utility models for finite first-order gambles. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1991, 4:29-59. doi: 10.1007/BF00057885.
35. Luce R.D., Marley A.A.J., Ng C.T. Entropy-related measures of the utility of gambling. The mathematics of preference, choice, and order: Essays in honor of Peter C. Fishburn 2009, 5-25. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-79128-7_1. S. Brams, W.V. Gehrlein, F.S. Roberts (Eds.).
36. Mazur J.E. An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. Quantitative analyses of behavior: Vol. 5. The effect of delay and of intervening events on reinforcement value 1987, 55-73. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. M.L. Commons, J.E. Mazur, J.A. Nevin, H. Rachlin (Eds.).
37. Merton R.C. Continuous-time finance 1990, Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.
38. Mosteller F., Nogee P. An experimental measurement of utility. Journal of Political Economy 1951, 59:371-404. doi: 10.1086/257106.
39. Myung I.J., Kim C., Pitt M.A. Toward an explanation of the power law artifact: Insights from response surface analysis. Memory & Cognition 2000, 28:832-840.
40. Ng C.T., Luce R.D., Marley A.A.J. Utility of gambling under p(olynomial)-additive joint receipt and segregation or duplex decomposition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2009, 53:273-286. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2009.04.001.
41. O'Donoghue T., Rabin M. Optimal sin taxes. Journal of Public Economics 2006, 90:1825-1849. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.03.001.
42. Parker S. Utility function for money determined using conjoint measurement. American Journal of Psychology 1981, 94:563-573. doi: 10.2307/1422419.
43. Preston M.G., Baratta P. An experimental study of the auction-value of an uncertain outcome. American Journal of Psychology 1948, 61:183-193. doi: 10.2307/1416964.
44. Quiggin J. Generalized expected utility theory: The rank-dependent model 1993, Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA.
45. Rabin M. Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica 2000, 68:1281-1292. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00158.
46. Rachlin H. Diminishing marginal value as delay discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 1992, 57:407-415. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1992.57-407.
47. Rachlin H. Notes on discounting. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 2006, 85:425-435. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2006.85-05.
48. Saha A. Expo-power utility: A " flexible" form for absolute and relative risk aversion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1993, 75:905-913. doi: 10.2307/1243978.
49. Simonsohn U. Direct risk aversion: Evidence from risky prospects valued below their worst outcome. Psychological Science 2009, 20:686-692. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02349.x.
50. Stevens S.S. On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review 1957, 64:153-181. doi: 10.1037/h0046162.
51. Stewart N., Chater N., Brown G.D.A. Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 53:1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.003.
52. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1992, 5:297-323. doi: 10.1007/BF00122574.
53. Vickrey W. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance 1961, 16:8-37. doi: 10.2307/2977633.
54. von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior 1953, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ. 3rd ed.
55. Wakker P.P. Explaining the characteristics of the power (CRRA) utility family. Health Economics 2008, 17:1329-1344. doi: 10.1002/hec.1331.
56. Weber E.U., Johnson E.J. Mindful judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology 2009, 60:53-85. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163633.