The feasibility of rubidium-82 positron emission tomography stress testing in low-risk chest pain protocol patients

Critical Pathways in Cardiology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 41-43

  Osborne, Anwar D ^a   Moore, Brooks ^a   Ross, Michael A ^a   Pitts, Stephen R ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

chest pain; observation; positron emission tomography; Stress testing

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; DIPYRIDAMOLE; RUBIDIUM 82;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY RECANALIZATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DATA BASE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EMERGENCY WARD; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; OBSERVATION UNIT; PHARMACOLOGIC STRESS TESTING; PHYSICIAN; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; THORAX PAIN;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; CHEST PAIN; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EXERCISE TEST; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RUBIDIUM RADIOISOTOPES;

EID: 79952371676     PISSN: 1535282X     EISSN: 15352811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31820d6a2e     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/ SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionu-clide Imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiol-ogy, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:2201-2229.
2. Friedewald VE, Iskandrian AE, Mahmarian JJ, et al. The editor's roundtable: advances in myocardial perfusion imaging. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:680-687.
3. Beller GA, Zaret BL. Contributions of nuclear cardiology to diagnosis and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2000;101: 1465-1478. (Pubitemid 30169872)
4. Chow BJ, Ananthasubramaniam K, dekemp RA, et al. Comparison of treadmill exercise versus dipyridamole stress with myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1227-1234. (Pubitemid 40523142)
5. Chow BJ, Wong JW, Yoshinaga K, et al. Prognostic significance of dipyr-idamole-induced ST depression in patients with normal 82Rb PET myocar-dial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:1095-1101. (Pubitemid 43741070)
6. Pagnanelli F, Cruz Viggi C, Toro L. Isolation and quantification of cadmium removal mechanisms in batch reactors inoculated by sulphate reducing bacteria: biosorption versus bioprecipitation. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101: 2981-2987.
7. Reilly BM, Evans AT, Schaider JJ, et al. Impact of a clinical decision rule on hospital triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. J AmA. 2002;288:342-350. (Pubitemid 34761613)
8. Goldstein JA, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, et al. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:863-871. (Pubitemid 46275355)
9. Chandra A, Rudraiah L, Zalenski RJ. Stress testing for risk stratification of patients with low to moderate probability of acute cardiac ischemia. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001;19:87-103. (Pubitemid 32097173)
10. Gomez MA, Anderson JL, Karagounis LA, et al. An emergency department-based protocol for rapidly ruling out myocardial ischemia reduces hospital time and expense: results of a randomized study (ROMIO). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:25-33. (Pubitemid 26266619)
11. Yoshinaga K, Chow BJ, Williams K, et al. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomog-raphy? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1029-1039. (Pubitemid 44292462)
12. Bateman TM, Heller GV, McGhie AI, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of rest/stress ECG-gated Rb-82 myocardial perfusion PET: comparison with ECG-gated Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2006;13:24-33. (Pubitemid 43192726)
13. Di Carli MF. Positron emission tomography for assessment ofmyocardial perfusion and viability. Cardiol Rev. 1998;6:290-301. (Pubitemid 28436150)
14. Patterson RE, Eisner RL, Horowitz SF. Comparison of cost-effectiveness and utility of exercise ECG, single photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, and coronary angiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1995;91:54-65.
15. Garber AM, Solomon NA. Cost-effectiveness of alternative test strategies for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:719-728. (Pubitemid 29211509)
16. Lipiniski M, Do D, Morise A, et al. What percent luminal stenosis should be used to define angiographic coronary artery disease for noninvasive test evaluation? Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2002;7:98-105. (Pubitemid 34657242)