Dynamic ranked retrieval

Proceedings of the 4th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, WSDM 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 247-256

  Brandt, Christina ^a   Joachims, Thorsten ^a   Yue, Yisong ^b   Bank, Jacob ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision theory; Diversified retrieval; Relevance feedback

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT; DECISION-THEORETIC; DIVERSIFIED RETRIEVAL; DYNAMIC RANKING; EMPIRICAL EVALUATIONS; INTERACTIVE RETRIEVAL; RANKED RETRIEVAL; RANKING ALGORITHM; RELEVANCE FEEDBACK; RETRIEVAL MODELS; RETRIEVAL PERFORMANCE; USER ACTIVITY; USER FEEDBACK;

ALGORITHMS; DATA MINING; FEEDBACK; IMAGE RETRIEVAL; WORLD WIDE WEB;

DECISION THEORY;

EID: 79952370249     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1935826.1935872     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. I. J. Aalbersberg. Incremental relevance feedback. In ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), pages 11-22, 1992.
2. R. Agrawal, S. Gollapudi, A. Halverson, and S. Ieong. Diversifying search results. In ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 2009.
3. A. Anagnostopoulos, L. Becchetti, C. Castillo, and A. Gionis. An optimization framework for query recommendation. In ACM Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM), 2010.
4. C. Buckley, G. Salton, J. Allan, and A. Singhal. Automatic query expansion using smart: Tree 3. In Text REtrieval Conference (TREC), 1994.
5. G. Cao, J.-Y. Nie, J. Gao, , and S. Robertson. Selecting good expansion terms for pseudo-relevance feedback. In ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), 2008.
6. H. Cao, D. Jiang, J. Pei, Q. He, Z. Liao, E. Chen, and H. Li. Context-aware query suggestion by mining click-through and session data. In ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2008.
7. J. Carbonell and J. Goldstein. The use of mmr, diversity-based reranking for reordering documents and reproducing summaries. In ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), 1998.
8. C. Clarke, M. Kolla, G. Cormack, O. Vechtomova, A. Ashkan, S. Büttcher, and I. Mackinnon. Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation. In ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), 2008.
9. M. Cramer, M. Wertheim, and D. Hardtke. Demonstration of improved search result relevancy using real-time implicit relevance feedback. In SIGIR Workshop on Understanding the User - Logging and Interpreting User Interactions in Information Search and Retrieval, 2009.
10. S. Cronen-Townsend, Y. Zhou, and W. B. Croft. A framework for selective query expansion. In ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), 2004.
11. K. El-Arini, G. Veda, D. Shahaf, and C. Guestrin. Turning down the noise in the blogosphere. In ACM Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), 2009.
12. N. Fuhr. A probability ranking principle for interactive information retrieval. Information Retrieval, 11(3):251-265, 2008.
13. D. Golovin and A. Krause. Adaptive submodularity: A new approach to active learning and stochastic optimization. In Conference on Learning Theory (COLT), 2010.
14. Q. Guo and E. Agichtein. Ready to buy or just browsing? Detecting web searcher goals from interaction data. In ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), 2010.
15. D. Kelly, K. Gyllstrom, and E. W. Bailey. A comparison of query and term suggestion features for interactive searching. In ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), 2009.
16. J. Koren, Y. Zhang, and X. Liu. Personalized interactive faceted search. In World Wide Web Conference (WWW), pages 477-486, 2008.
17. C. Manning, P. Raghavan, and H. Schütze. Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, 2008.
18. J. Ponte. Language models for relevance feedback. In Advances in Information Retrieval, pages 73-96. Springer, 2000.
19. F. Radlinski, P. Bennett, B. Carterette, and T. Joachims. Redundancy, diversity, and interdependent document relevance, a summary of the sigir 2009 workshop. ACM SIGIR Forum, 2009.
20. F. Radlinski, R. Kleinberg, and T. Joachims. Learning diverse rankings with multi-armed bandits. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2008.
21. S. Robertson. The probability ranking principle in ir. journal of documentation. Journal of Documentation, 33(4):294-304, 1977. (Pubitemid 8594767)
22. J. Rocchio. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing, pages 313-323. Prentice Hall, 1971.
23. I. Ruthven and M. Lalmas. A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems. Knowledge Engineering Review, 18(2):95-145, 2003.
24. G. Salton and C. Buckley. Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society of Information Science, 41(4):288-297, 1990.
25. X. Shen and C. Zhai. Active feedback in ad hoc information retrieval. In ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), 2005.
26. Z. Xu and R. Akella. Active relevance feedback for difficult queries. In ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), 2008.
27. Y. Yue and T. Joachims. Predicting diverse subsets using structural svms. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2008.
28. C. Zhai, W. W. Cohen, and J. Lafferty. Beyond independent relevance: Methods and evaluation metric for subtopic retrieval. In ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), 2003.
29. C. Zhai and J. Lafferty. Model-based feedback in the language modeling approach to information retrieval. In ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM), 2001.
30. L. Zhang and Y. Zhang. Interactive retrieval based on faceted feedback. In ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR), 2010.