The Allometry of Reproductive Allocation

Reproductive Allocation in Plants

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 97-128

  Cheplick, Gregory P ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952366468     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-012088386-8/50004-1     Document Type: Chapter

References (84)

1. F.J. Acosta, J.A. Delgado, F. Lopez and J.M. Serrano (1997) Functional features and ontogenetic changes in reproductive allocation and partitioning strategies of plant modules. Plant Ecol 132 71-76.
2. F.J. Acosta, J.M. Serrano, C. Pastor and F. Lopez (1993) Significant potential levels of hierarchical phenotypic selection in a woody perennial plant, Cistus ladanifer. Oikos 68 267-272.
3. R.A. Armstrong (1982) A quantitative theory of reproductive effort in rhizomatous perennial plants. Ecology 63 679-686.
4. F.A. Bazzaz (1996) Plants in Changing Environments: Linking Physiological, Population, and Community Ecology Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
5. F.A. Bazzaz (1997) Allocation of resources in plants: state of the science and critical questions. F.A. Bazzaz, J. Grace (Eds) Plant Resource Allocation San Diego: Academic Press 1-37.
6. F.A. Bazzaz and D.D. Ackerly (1992) Reproductive allocation and reproductive effort in plants. M. Fenner (Eds) Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities Wallingford: CAB International 1-26.
7. H.S. Callahan and D.M. Waller (2000) Phenotypic integration and the plasticity of integration in an amphicarpic annual. Int J Plant Sci 161 89-98.
8. G.P. Cheplick (1994) Life history evolution in amphicarpic plants. Plant Species Biol 9 119-131.
9. G.P. Cheplick (1995) Plasticity of seed number, mass, and allocation in clones of the perennial grass Amphibromus scabrivalvis. Int J Plant Sci 156 522-529.
10. G.P. Cheplick (2001) Quantitative genetics of mass allocation and the allometry of reproduction in Amaranthus albus: relation to soil nutrients. Int J Plant Sci 162 807-816.
11. G.P. Cheplick and T.P. White (2002) Saltwater spray as an agent of natural selection: no evidence of local adaptation within a coastal population of Triplasis purpurea (Poaceae). Amer J Bot 89 623-631.
12. G.P. Cheplick and V.M. Wickstrom (1999) Assessing the potential for competition on a coastal beach and the significance of variable seed mass in Triplasis purpurea. J Torrey Bot Soc 126 296-306.
13. J.S. Coleman, K.D.M. McConnaughay and D.D. Ackerly (1994) Interpreting phenotypic variation in plants. Trends Ecol Evol 9 187-191.
14. J. Damuth (2001) Scaling of growth: plants and animals are not so different. PNAS 98 2113-2114.
15. J. Farrar and S. Gunn (1998) Allocation: allometry acclimation—and alchemy? H. Lambers, H. Poorter, M.M.I. Van Vuuren (Eds) Inherent Variation in Plant Growth. Physiological Mechanisms and Ecological Consequences Leiden: Backhuys Publishers 183-198.
16. M.A. Farris and M.J. Lechowicz (1990) Functional interactions among traits that determine reproductive success in a native annual plant. Ecology 71 548-557.
17. J. Gayon (2000) History of the concept of allometry. Amer Zool 40 748-758.
18. D.J. Gibson (2002) Methods in Comparative Plant Population Ecology Oxford: Oxford University Press
19. S.J. Gould (1966) Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol Rev 41 587-640.
20. S.J. Gould (1975) Allometry in primates with emphasis on scaling and the evolution of the brain. Contri Primatol 5 244-292.
21. D.F. Greene and E.A. Johnson (1994) Estimating the mean annual seed production of trees. Ecology 75 642-647.
22. J.F. Hancock and M.P. Pritts (1987) Does reproductive effort vary across different life forms and seral environments? A review of the literature. Bull Torrey Bot Club 114 53-59.
23. T. Hara, S. Kawano and Y. Nagai (1988) Optimal reproductive strategy of plants, with special reference to the modes of reproductive resource allocation. Plant Species Biol 3 43-59.
24. J.L. Harper and J. Ogden (1970) The reproductive strategy of higher plants. I. The concept of strategy with special reference to Senecio vulgaris L. J Ecol 58 681-698.
25. D.C. Hartnett (1990) Size-dependent allocation to sexual and vegetative reproduction in four clonal composites. Oecologia 84 254-259.
26. A.M. Hemborg and P.S. Karlsson (1998) Altitudinal variation in size effects on plant reproductive effort and somatic costs of reproduction. Ecoscience 5 517-525.
27. J.S. Huxley (1932) Problems of Relative Growth New York: Mac Veagh
28. S. Kawano (1981) Trade-off relationships between some reproductive characteristics in plants with special reference to life history strategy. Bot Mag Tokyo 94 285-294.
29. S. Kawano and K. Matsuo (1983) Studies on the life history of the genus Plantago. I. Reproductive energy allocation and propagule output in wild populations of a ruderal species, Plantago asiatica L., extending over a broad altitudinal gradient. J Coll Lib Arts, Toyama Univ (Nat Sci) 16 85-112.
30. S. Kawano and S. Miyake (1983) The productive and reproductive biology of flowering plants. X. Reproductive energy allocation and propagule output of five congeners of the genus Setaria (Gramineae). Oecologia 57 6-13.
31. S. Kawano and Y. Nagai (1986) Regulatory mechanisms of reproductive effort in plants. I. Plasticity in reproductive energy allocation and propagule output of Helianthus annuus L. (Compositae) cultivated at varying densities and nitrogen levels. Plant Species Biol 1 1-18.
32. S. Kawano, S. Hayashi, H. Arai, M. Yamamoto, H. Takasu and T. Oritani (1989) Regulatory mechanisms of reproductive effort in plants. III. Plasticity in reproductive energy allocation and propagule output of two grass species, Oryza sativa cv. Akihikari and Coix ma-yuen cultivated at varying densities and nitrogen levels, and the evolutionary-ecological implications. Plant Species Biol 4 75-99.
33. P.G.L. Klinkhamer, E. Meelis, T.J. de Jong and J. Weiner (1992) On the analysis of size-dependent reproductive output in plants. Funct Ecol 6 308-316.
34. D.C. LeMaitre and J.J. Midgley (1991) Allometric relationships between leaf and inflorescence mass in the genus Protea (Proteaceae): an analysis of the exceptions to the rule. Funct Ecol 5 476-484.
35. C. Loehle (1987) Partitioning of reproductive effort in clonal plants: a benefit-cost model. Oikos 49 199-208.
36. C. Marshall and E.A.C. Price (1997) Sectoriality and its implications for physiological integration. H. de Kroon, J. van Groenendael (Eds) The Ecology and Evolution of Clonal Plants Leiden: Backhuys Publishers 79-107.
37. M. Mendez and J.R. Obeso (1993) Size-dependent reproductive and vegetative allocation in Arum italicum (Araceae). Can J Bot 71 309-314.
38. K.J. Niklas (1994) Plant Allometry: The Scaling of Form and Process Chicago: University of Chicago Press
39. K.J. Niklas and B.J. Enquist (2002) Canonical rules for plant organ biomass partitioning and annual allocation. Amer J Bot 89 812-819.
40. K.J. Niklas and B.J. Enquist (2002) On the vegetative biomass partitioning of seed plant leaves, stems, and roots. Am Nat 159 482-497.
41. K.J. Niklas and B.J. Enquist (2003) An allometric model for seed plant reproduction. Evol Ecol Res 5 79-88.
42. J.R. Obeso (2002) The costs of reproduction in plants. New Phytol 155 321-348.
43. M. Ohlson (1988) Size-dependent reproductive effort in three populations of Saxifraga hirculus in Sweden. J Ecol 76 1007-1016.
44. B. Pedersen and J. Tuomi (1995) Hierarchical selection and fitness in modular and clonal organisms. Oikos 73 167-180.
45. R.H. Peters (1983) The Ecological Implications of Body Size Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
46. R.H. Peters, S. Cloutier, D. Dube, A. Evans, P. Hastings, H. Kaiser, D. Kohn and B. Sarwer-Foner (1988) The allometry of the weight of fruit on trees and shrubs in Barbados. Oecologia 74 612-616.
47. J. Pino, F.X. Sans and R.M. Masalles (2002) Size-dependent reproductive pattern and short-term reproductive cost in Rumex obtusifolius. Acta Oecologica 23 321-328.
48. E.G. Reekie (1998) An explanation for size-dependent reproductive allocation in Plantago major. Can J Bot 76 43-50.
49. E.G. Reekie (1999) Resource allocation, trade-offs, and reproductive effort in plants. T.O. Vuorisalo, P.K. Mutikainen (Eds) Life History Evolution in Plants Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers 173-193.
50. E.G. Reekie and F.A. Bazzaz (1987) Reproductive effort in plants. 3. Effect of reproduction on vegetative activity. Am Nat 129 907-919.
51. E.G. Reekie and F.A. Bazzaz (1992) Cost of reproduction as reduced growth in genotypes of two congeneric species with contrasting life histories. Oecologia 90 21-26.
52. M.J. Reiss (1989) The Allometry of Growth and Reproduction Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
53. V.O. Sadras, M.P. Bange and S.P. Milroy (1997) Reproductive allocation of cotton in response to plant and environmental factors. Ann Bot 80 75-81.
54. D.A. Samson and K.S. Werk (1986) Size-dependent effects in the analysis of reproductive effort in plants. Am Nat 127 667-680.
55. F.X. Sans and R.M. Masalles (1994) Life-history variation in the annual arable weed Diplotaxis erucoides (Cruciferae). Can J Bot 72 10-19.
56. C.D. Schlichting and M. Pigliucci (1998) Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction norm Perspective Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
57. B. Schmid and J. Weiner (1993) Plastic relationships between reproductive and vegetative mass in Solidago altissima. Evolution 47 61-74.
58. B. Shipley (2000) Cause and Correlation in Biology Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
59. B. Shipley and J. Dion (1992) The allometry of seed production in herbaceous angiosperms. Am Nat 139 467-483.
60. J.D. Soule and P.A. Werner (1981) Patterns of resource allocation in plants, with special reference to Potentilla recta L. Bull Torrey Bot Club 108 311-319.
61. A.J.A. Stewart, E.A. John and M.J. Hutchings (2000) The world is heterogeneous: ecological consequences of living in a patchy environment. M.J. Hutchings, E.A. John, A.J.A. Stewart (Eds) The Ecological Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity Oxford: Blackwell Science 1-8.
62. S. Sugiyama and F.A. Bazzaz (1998) Size dependence of reproductive allocation: the influence of resource availability, competition and genetic identity. Funct Ecol 12 280-288.
63. D.J. Susko and L. Lovett-Doust (2000) Plant size and fruit-position effects on reproductive allocation in Alliaria petiolata (Brassicaceae). Can J Bot 78 1398-1407.
64. A. Suzuki (2000) Patterns of vegetative growth and reproduction in relation to branch orders: the plant as a spatially structured population. Trees 14 329-333.
65. A. Suzuki (2001) Resource allocation to vegetative growth and reproduction at shoot level in Eurya japonica (Theaceae): a hierarchical investment? New Phytol 152 307-312.
66. J.R. Swallen (1931) The grass genus Amphibromus. Amer J Bot 18 411-415.
67. D.W. Thompson (1917) On Growth and Form Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
68. M. Tseng and L. Rowe (1999) Sexual dimorphism and allometry in the giant water strider Gigantometra gigas. Can J Zool 77 923-929.
69. M. Van Kleunen, M. Fischer and B. Schmid (2001) Effects of intraspecific competition on size variation and reproductive allocation in a clonal plant. Oikos 94 515-524.
70. C.R.C. Vega, V.O. Sadras, F.H. Andrade and S.A. Uhart (2000) Reproductive allometry in soybean, maize and sunflower. Ann Bot 85 461-468.
71. T. Vuorisalo and P. Mutikainen (1999) Modularity and plant life histories. T.O. Vuorisalo, P.K. Mutikainen (Eds) Life History Evolution in Plants Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers 1-25.
72. L.K. Wagner (1989) Size dependent reproduction in Poa annua and P. pratensis. J.H. Bock, Y.B. Linhart (Eds) The Evolutionary Ecology of Plants Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press 273-284.
73. J. Weiner (1988) The influence of competition on plant reproduction. J. Lovett Doust, L. Lovett Doust (Eds) Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies Oxford: Oxford University Press 228-245.
74. J. Weiner (1988) Variation in the performance of individuals in plant populations. A.J. Davy, M.J. Hutchings, A.R. Watkinson (Eds) Plant Population Ecology Oxford: Blackwell Scientific 59-81.
75. C.V.J. Welham and R.A. Setter (1998) Comparison of size-dependent reproductive effort in two dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) populations. Can J Bot 76 166-173.
76. R.H. Whittaker and G.M. Woodwell (1968) Dimension and reproduction relations of trees and shrubs in the Brookhaven Forest, New York. J Ecol 56 1-25.
77. J. White (1979) The plant as a metapopulation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10 109-145.
78. J. White (1981) The allometric interpretation of the self-thinning rule. J Theor Biol 89 475-500.
79. J. White and J.L. Harper (1970) Correlated changes in plant size and number in plant populations. J Ecol 58 467-485.
80. S. Wikberg (1995) Fitness in clonal plants. Oikos 72 293-297.
81. A.M. Wilson and K. Thompson (1989) A comparative study of reproductive allocation in 40 British grasses. Funct Ecol 3 297-302.
82. E. Winkler and M. Fischer (1999) Two fitness measures for clonal plants and the importance of spatial aspects. Plant Ecol 141 191-199.
83. A.C. Worley and L.D. Harder (1996) Size-dependent resource allocation and costs of reproduction in Pinguicula vulgaris (Lentibulariaceae). J Ecol 84 195-206.
84. D.-Y. Zhang and X.-H. Jiang (2002) Size-dependent resource allocation and sex allocation in herbaceous perennial plants. J Evol Biol 15 74-83.