Comparison of high-order absorbing boundary conditions and perfectly matched layers in the frequency domain

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2010, Pages 1351-1369

  Rabinovich, Daniel ^a   Givoli, Dan ^a   Bécache, Eliane ^b  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Absorbing boundary condition; Artificial boundary; Auxiliary variables; Finite elements; Helmholtz equation; High order; Perfectly matched layer; Waves

Indexed keywords

ABSORBING BOUNDARY CONDITION; ARTIFICIAL BOUNDARIES; AUXILIARY VARIABLES; FINITE ELEMENT; HIGH-ORDER; PERFECTLY MATCHED LAYER;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE ABSORPTION; FREQUENCY DOMAIN ANALYSIS; HELMHOLTZ EQUATION; OPTICAL WAVEGUIDES; WAVES;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

EID: 79952361280     PISSN: 20407939     EISSN: 20407947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1394     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Vignon IE, Taylor CA. Outflow boundary conditions for one-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure waves in arteries. Wave Motion 2004; 39:361-374.
2. Vignon-Clementel IE, Figueroa CA, Jansen KE, Taylor CA. Outflow boundary conditions for three-dimensional finite element modeling of blood flow and pressure waves in arteries. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:3776-3796.
3. Quarteroni A. Modelling the cardiovascular system: a mathematical challenge. In Mathematics Unlimited-2001 and Beyond, Engquist B, Schmid W (eds). Springer: Berlin, 2000; 961-970.
4. Givoli D. Non-reflecting boundary conditions: a review. Journal of Computational Physics 1991; 94:1-29.
5. Tsynkov SV. Numerical solution of problems on unbounded domains. a review. Applied Numerical Mathematics 1998; 27:465-532.
6. Hagstrom T. Radiation boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves. Acta Numerica 1999; 8:47-106.
7. Ihlenburg F. Finite Element Analysis of Acoustic Scattering. Springer: New York, 1998.
8. Astley J, Gerdes K, Givoli D, Harari I (eds). Special issue: finite elements for wave propagation. Journal of Computational Acoustics 2000; 8(1):1-255.
9. Givoli D, Harari I (eds). Special issue: exterior problems of wave propagation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 1998; 164(1-2):1-266.
10. Turkel E (ed.). Special issue: absorbing boundary conditions. Applied Numerical Mathematics 1998; 27(4):325-557.
11. Collino F. High order absorbing boundary conditions for wave propagation models. Straight line boundary and corner cases. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mathematical and Numerical Aspects of Wave Propagation, Kleinman R et al. (eds). SIAM: Delaware, 1993; 161-171.
12. Givoli D. High-order local non-reflecting boundary conditions: a review. Wave Motion 2004; 39:319-326.
13. Engquist B, Majda A. Radiation boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave calculations. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 1979; 32:313-357.
14. Bayliss A, Turkel E. Radiation boundary conditions for wave-like equations. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 1980; 33:707-725.
15. Higdon RL. Numerical absorbing boundary conditions for the wave equation. Mathematics of Computation 1987; 49:65-90.
16. Bérenger JP. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves. Journal of Computational Physics 1994; 114:185-200.
17. Chew WC, Liu QH. Perfectly matched layers for elastodynamics: a new absorbing boundary condition. Journal of Computational Acoustics 1996; 4:341-359.
18. Asvadurov S, Druskin V, Guddati M, Knizherman L. On optimal finite difference approximation of PML. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 2003; 41:287-305.
19. Givoli D. Computational absorbing boundaries. In Computational Acoustics of Noise Propagation in Fluids, Marburg S, Nolte B (eds), Chapter 5. Springer: Berlin, 2008; 145-166.
20. Hagstrom T, Warburton T. A new auxiliary variable formulation of high-order local radiation boundary conditions: corner compatibility conditions and extensions to first order systems. Wave Motion 2004; 39:327-338.
21. Givoli D, Hagstrom T, Patlashenko I. Finite element formulation with high order absorbing boundary conditions for time-dependent waves. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2006; 195:3666-3690.
22. Hagstrom T, de Castro M, Givoli D, Tsemach D. Local high order absorbing boundary conditions for timedependent waves in guides. Journal of Computational Acoustics 2007; 15:1-22.
23. Hagstrom T, Mar-Or A, Givoli D. High-Order local absorbing conditions for the wave equation: extensions and improvements. Journal of Computational Physics 2008; 227:3322-3357.
24. Bećache E, Givoli D, Hagstrom T. High order absorbing boundary conditions for anisotropic and convective wave equations. Journal of Computational Physics 2010; 229:1099-1129.
25. Turkel E, Yefet A. Absorbing PML boundary layers for wave-like equations. Applied Numerical Mathematics 1998; 27:533-557.
26. Harari I, Slavutin M, Turkel E. Analytical and numerical studies of a finite element PML for the Helmholtz equation. Journal of Computational Acoustics 2000; 8:121-137.
27. Singer I, Turkel E. A perfectly matched layer for the Helmholtz equation in a semi-infinite Strip. Journal of Computational Physics 2004; 201:439-465.
28. Bécache E, Bonnet-Ben Dhia A-S, Legendre G. Perfectly matched layers for the convected Helmholtz equation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis 2004; 42:409-433.
29. Bermúdez A, Hervella-Nieto L, Prieto A, Rodriguez R. An optimal perfectly matched layer with unbounded absorbing function for time-harmonic acoustic scattering problems. Journal of Computational Physics 2007; 223:469-488.
30. Bermúdez A, Hervella-Nieto L, Prieto A, Rodriguez R. An exact bounded perfectly matched layer for timeharmonic scattering problems. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computation 2007; 30:312-338.
31. Michler C, Demkowicz L, Kurtz J, Pardo D. Improving the performance of perfectly matched layers by means of hp-adaptivity. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations 2007; 23:832-858.
32. Pardo D, Demkowicz L, Torres-Verdin C, Michler C. PML enhanced with a self-adaptive goal-oriented hp-finite element method: simulation of through-casting borehole resistivity measurements. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2008; 30:2948-2964.
33. Michler C, Demkowicz L, Torres-Verdin C. Numerical simulation of Borehole acoustic logging in the frequency and time domains with hp-adaptive finite elements. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2009; 198:1821-1838.
34. Kucherov L, Givoli D. High order absorbing boundary conditions incorporated in a spectral element formulation. Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering; to appear. On-line ref. DOI: 10.1002/cnm.1188.
35. Lindquist JM, Neta B, Giraldo FX. A spectral element solution of the Klein-Gordon equation with high-order treatment of time and non-reflecting boundary. Wave Motion 2009; DOI: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2009.11.007.
36. Andrés Prieto, Personal communication, October 2009.
37. Harari I, Patlashenko I, Givoli D. Dirichlet-to-Neumann maps for unbounded waveguides. Journal of Computational Physics 1998; 143:200-223.
38. Tagness A, Hagness SC. Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite Difference Time Domain. Artech House:Boston, 2000.
39. Sevilla R, Fernandez-Mendez S, Huerta A. NURBS-enhanced finite element method (NEFEM). International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 2008; 76:56-83.
40. Datta PK, Bhattacharya D. Optimization of uniaxial perfectly matched layer parameters for finite difference time domain simulation and application to coupled microstrip lines with multiple bend discontinuities. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering 2002; 12:508-519.