Who shapes network neutrality policy debate? An examination of information subsidizers in the mainstream media and at Congressional and FCC hearings

Telecommunications Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 314-324

  Kim, Minjeong ^a   Chung, Chung Joo ^b   Kim, Jang Hyun ^c  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Congressional hearing; FCC hearing; Information subsidy; Media; Network neutrality; Policy making

Indexed keywords

CONGRESSIONAL HEARING; FCC HEARING; INFORMATION SUBSIDY; MEDIA; NETWORK NEUTRALITY; POLICY-MAKING;

INTERNET; ONLINE SYSTEMS; WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

AUDITION;

EID: 79952350028     PISSN: 03085961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2011.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bauer, J. M. (2006). Dynamic effects of network neutrality. Paper presented at the annual conference of the telecommunications policy research conference, Arlington, VA, USA, September 2006 https://www.msu.edu/bauerj/ PresentationsFrame.html 〉
2. Berners-Lee, T. (2008). Tim Berners-Lee: OWD 2007 http://onewebday.org/? p=249 〉
3. S. Braman Introduction S. Brama, Communication researchers and policy-making 2003 MIT Press Cambridge 1 9
4. S. Brint Rethinking the policy influence of experts: From general characterizations to analysis of variation Sociological Forum 5 1990 361 385
5. Comcast v. Federal Communications Commission (2010). US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, 2010-08-1291 (Decided April 6, 2010).
6. Dalton, R. J., Scarrow, S. E., & Cain, B. E. (2003). Democracy transformed? Expanding political opportunities in advanced industrial democracies http://repositories.cdlib.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article= 1021&context=csd 〉
7. FCC (2005a). In the matter of Madison River Communication, LLC and affiliated companies http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs-public/attachmatch/DA-05- 543A2.pdf 〉
8. FCC (2005b). Internet policy statement: Appropriate framework for broadband access to the Internet over wireline facilities (CC Docket No. 02-33) http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs-public/attachmatch/FCC-05-150A1.pdf 〉
9. FCC (2008). Memorandum opinion and order, FCC 08-183 http://blog.wired. com/27bstroke6/files/comcastdecision.pdf 〉
10. O.H. Gandy Jr. Beyond agenda setting: Information subsidies and public policy 1982 Ablex Pub. Co. Norwood, NJ
11. D.L. Garcia, and E. Surles Media ownership and communications: Enriching the research agenda Telecommunications Policy 31 2007 473 492 (Pubitemid 47211646)
12. Genachowski, J. (2009). Preserving a free and open Internet: A platform for innovation, opportunity, and prosperity. Prepared remarks of Chairman Julius Genachowski, The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 21 September 2009 http://openinternet.gov/read-speech.html 〉
13. K.T. Larsen A taxonomy of actecedents of information system success: Variable analysis studies Journal of Management Information Systems 20 2 2003 169 246
14. M.A. Lemley, and L. Lessig The end of end-to-end: Preserving the architecture of the Internet in the broadband era UCLA Law Review 48 2001 925 972 (Pubitemid 33262026)
15. Lessig, L. (2007). Jamming the pearl, August 10, 2007 http://lessig.org/blog/2007/08/jamming-the-pearl.html 〉
16. J. Li, P. Zhang, and Y. Jiang Design the overall framework of external information system for GSS Service Systems and Service Management 911 2007 1 6
17. R.W. McChesney The problem of the media: U.S. communication politics in the twenty-first century 2004 Monthly Review Press New York
18. S.D Meinrath, and V.W. Pickard The new network neutrality: Criteria for Internet freedom International Journal of Communication Law and Policy Winter 2008 226 243
19. J. Miller Telecommunications planning and the power of experts Telecommunications Policy 2 1983 137 148
20. K. Miller Organizational communication 5th ed. 2009 Wadsworth Cengage Learning Boston
21. S. Miller FCCs third way: Narrowly tailored Internet takeover? The News Media and The Law 34 4 2010 36 Retrieved from
22. National Cable & Telecommunications Association et al. v. Brand X Internet services et al. (2005). 545 U.S. 967. Certiorari to the United States Court of appeals for the ninth circuit http://db.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/04- 277.ZS.html 〉
23. C.A. OReilly III. Variations in decision makers use of information sources: The impact of quality and accessibility of information The Academy of Management Journal 25 1982 756 771
24. OECD (2006). Internet neutrality: A policy overview. OECD Working Party on Telecommunication and Information Services Policies, OECD Report, DSTI/ICCP/TISP(2006)4/-FINAL, Dublin, May 2930, 2006 http://www.oecd.org/ dataoecd/43/63/38405781.pdf 〉
25. B.I. Page, and R.Y. Shapiro The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans policy preferences 1992 The University of Chicago Press Chicago
26. Powell, M. K. (2004). Preserving Internet freedom: Guiding principles for the industry http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs-public/attachmatch/DOC-243556A1.pdf 〉
27. Reardon, M. (2005). FCC changes DSL classification. CNET News, February 8 http://news.cnet.com/2100-1034-3-5820713.html 〉
28. B. Rupert The 110th Congress and network neutrality: S. 215 - The Internet Freedom Preservation Act DePaul Journal of Art, Technology and Intellectual Property Law 18 2008 325 364
29. A.L. Signaigo National Cable and Telecommunications Association v. Brand X Internet Services: Resolving irregularities in regulation? Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property 5 2007 Retrieved from
30. T. Wu Network neutrality, broadband discrimination Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law 2 2003 141 179
31. Wu, T. (n.d.). Network neutrality FAQ http://www.timwu.org/network- neutrality.html 〉
32. Wu, T., & Lessig, L. (2003). Re: Ex Parte Submission in CS Docker No. 02-52 http://www.freepress.net/files/wu-lessig-fcc.pdf 〉
33. C.S. Yoo Network neutrality and the economics of congestion Georgetown Law Journal 94 2006 1847 1908 (Pubitemid 44561851)
34. K. Zhu Bringing neutrality to network neutrality Berkeley Technology Law Journal 22 2007 615 645