Bioretention Outflow: Does It Mimic Nonurban Watershed Shallow Interflow?

Journal of Hydrologic Engineering

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 274-279

  DeBusk, Kathy M ^a   Hunt, William F ^a   Line, Daniel E ^a  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Best management practice; Hydrology; Storm water management; Streamflow

Indexed keywords

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; BIORETENTION; BIORETENTION CELL; DATA SETS; FLOW VOLUMES; INTERFLOW; LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT; NORTH CAROLINA; OUTFLOW RATE; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SHALLOW GROUNDWATER; SMALL STREAMS; STATISTICAL DIFFERENCES; STORM EVENTS; STREAMS DRAINING;

HYDRAULICS; LANDFORMS; MIRRORS; RIVERS; STORMS; STREAM FLOW; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHEDS;

RECHARGING (UNDERGROUND WATERS);

BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; OUTFLOW; RECHARGE; RETENTION; STORMWATER; STREAMFLOW; WATERSHED;

EID: 79952318439     PISSN: 10840699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000315     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Coffman L. Green R. Clar M. Bitter S. Design considerations associated with bioretention practices. Water management in the 90's: time for innovation 1993, 130-133. K. Hon, and ed., ASCE, Reston, VA.
2. Chang N.-B. Hydrological connections between low-impact development, watershed best management practices, and sustainable development. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2010, 15(6):384-385. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000236.
3. Davis A.P. Green engineering principles promote low-impact development. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2005, 39(16):338A-344A. ESTHAG, 0013-936X, 10.1021/es053327e.
4. Davis A.P. Field performance of bioretention: Hydrology impacts. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2008, 13(2):90-95. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:2(90).
5. Davison A.C. Hinkley D.V. Bootstrap methods and their application 1997, and Cambridge University Press, New York.
6. Dietz M.E. Low impact development practices: review of current research and recommendations for future directions. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2007, 186(1-4):351-363. WAPLAC, 0049-6979, 10.1007/s11270-007-9484-z.
7. Hunt W.F. Jarrett A.R. Smith J.T. Sharkey L.J. Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina. J. Irrig. Drain Eng. 2006, 132(6):600-608. JIDEDH, 0733-9437, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2006)132:6(600), and.
8. Hunt W.F. Smith J.T. Jadlocki S.J. Hathaway J.M. Eubanks P.R. Pollutant removal and peak flow mitigation by bioretention cell in urban Charlotte, NC. J. Environ. Eng. 2008, 134(5):403-408. JOEEDU, 0733-9372, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2008)134:5(403), and.
9. Li H. Sharkey L.J. Hunt W.F. Davis A.P. Mitigation of impervious surface hydrology using bioretention in North Carolina and Maryland. J. Hydrol. Eng. 2009, 14(4):407-415. JHYEFF, 1084-0699, 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2009)14:4(407), and.
10. Line D.E. White N.M. Effects of development on runoff and pollutant export. Water Environ. Res. 2007, 79(2):185-190. WAERED, 1061-4303, 10.2175/106143006X111736, and.
11. Meyer S.C. Analysis of base flow trends in urban streams, northeastern Illinois, USA. Hydrogeol. J. 2004, 13(5-6):871-885. HJYOAW, 1431-2174, 10.1007/s10040-004-0383-8.
12. Miller D.P. Bootstrap 101: Obtain robust confidence intervals for any statistic. Proc., Twenty-Ninth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference 2004, SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC.
13. Soil data mart. 2008, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), (Aug. 2, 2010).
14. Nelson R.A. Smith J.A. Miller A.J. Evolution of channel morphology and hydrologic response in an urbanizing drainage basin. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 2006, 31(9):1063-1079. ESPLDB, 0197-9337, 10.1002/esp.1308, and.
15. Climate normals. 2008, North Carolina State Climate Office (NCSCO), (Dec. 15, 2008).
16. Passeport E. Hunt W.F. Line D.E. Smith R.A. Brown R.A. Field study of the ability of two grassed bioretention cells to reduce storm-water runoff pollution. J. Irrig. Drain Eng. 2009, (4):505-510. JIDEDH, 0733-9437, 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0000006, and 135.
17. Phillips P.J. Bode R.W. Pesticides in surface water runoff in southeastern New York State, USA: Seasonal and stormflow effects on concentrations. Pest Manage. Sci. 2004, 60(6):531-543. PMSCFC, 1526-498X, 10.1002/ps.879, and.
18. Rose S. Peters N.E. Effects of urbanization on streamflow in the Atlanta area (Georgia, USA): comparative hydrological approach. Hydrol. Processes 2001, 15(8):1441-1457. HYPRE3, 1099-1085, 10.1002/hyp.218, and.
19. Sala M. Inbar M. Some hydrologic effects of urbanization in Catalan Rivers. Catena 1992, 19(3-4):363-378. CIJPD3, 0341-8162, 10.1016/0341-8162(92)90009-Z, and.
20. Schoonover J.E. Lockaby B.G. Helms B.S. Impacts of land cover on stream hydrology in the West Georgia Piedmont, USA. Environ. Qual. 2006, 35(6):2123-2131. JEVQAA, 0047-2425, 10.2134/jeq2006.0113, and.
21. Sharkey L.J. The performance of bioretention areas in North Carolina: study of water quality, water quantity, and soil media. 2006, M.S. thesis, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC.
22. Vicars-Groening J. Williams H.F. L. Impact of urbanization on storm response of White Rock Creek, Dallas, TX. Environ. Geol. 2006, 51:1263-1269. ENGOE9, 0943-0105, 10.1007/s00254-006-0419-6, and.
23. Wheeler A.P. Angermeier P.L. Rosenberger A.E. Impacts of new highways and subsequent landscape urbanization on stream habitat and biota. Rev. Fish. Sci. 2005, 13(3):141-164. RFSCFJ, 1064-1262, 10.1080/10641260590964449, and.
24. Widianarko B. Verwejj R.A. Van Gestel C.A. M. Van Straalen N.M. Spatial distribution of trace metals in sediments from urban streams of Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2000, 46:95-100. EESADV, 0147-6513, 10.1006/eesa.1999.1878, and.
25. Low impact development (LID): literature review. 2000, USEPA, EPA-841-B-00-005, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.