Quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges and DXA of the lumbar spine and proximal femur in evaluating the risk of osteoporotic vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women;Ultrasonometria quantitativa alla falange e DXA lombare e del femore prossimale nella valutazione del rischio di frattura vertebrale da osteoporosi in donne in post-menopausa

Radiologia Medica

Volumn 116, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 92-101

  Albanese, C V ^a   De Terlizzi, F ^b   Passariello, R ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b IGEA Biophysics Laboratory   (Italy)

Author keywords

DXA; Osteoporosis; QUS; Vertebral fractures

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CAUCASIAN; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINGER PHALANX; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; HUMAN; ITALY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; POSTMENOPAUSE OSTEOPOROSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RADIOGRAPHY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPINE FRACTURE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BONE DENSITY; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; FEMUR; FINGER PHALANGES; HUMANS; ITALY; LOGISTIC MODELS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOPOROSIS, POSTMENOPAUSAL; OSTEOPOROTIC FRACTURES; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SPINAL FRACTURES;

EID: 79952315069     PISSN: 00338362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-010-0577-1     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Consensus Development Conference 1993 Diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis Am J Med 94 646 650 10.1016/0002-9343(93)90218-E (Pubitemid 23166713)
2. K.E. Ensrud D.E. Thompson J.A. Cauley, et al. 2000 Prevalent vertebral deformities predict mortality and hospitalisation in older women with low bone mass. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group J Am Geriatr Soc 48 241 249 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7psFWrtA%3D%3D 10733048 (Pubitemid 30164205)
3. C. Cooper 1997 The crippling consequences of fractures and their impact on quality of life Am J Med 103 12S 19S 1:STN:280:DyaK2svkvVGltQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0002-9343(97)90022-X 9302893 (Pubitemid 27386437)
4. L.J. Melton III M. Thamer N.F. Ray, et al. 1997 Fractures attributable to osteoporosis: report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation J Bone Miner Res 12 16 23 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.16 9240721 (Pubitemid 27053607)
5. R. Eastell 1998 Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis N Engl J Med 338 736 746 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXitFars70%3D 10.1056/NEJM199803123381107 9494151 (Pubitemid 28115093)
6. H.K. Genant K. Engelke T. Fuerst, et al. 1996 Noninvasive assessment of bone mineral and structure: state of the art J Bone Miner Res 11 707 730 1:STN:280:DyaK28zmtl2gtA%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650110602 8725168 (Pubitemid 26172795)
7. S.R. Cummings M.C. Nevitt W.S. Browner, et al. 1995 Risk factors for hip fracture in white women N Engl J Med 332 767 773 1:STN:280:DyaK2M7ms1aktw%3D%3D 10.1056/NEJM199503233321202 7862179
8. W.C. Hayes S.J. Piazza P.K. Zysset 1991 Biomechanics of fracture risk prediction of the hip and spine by quantitative computed tomography Rad Clin North Am 29 1 18 1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2FovVOntA%3D%3D
9. C.C. Glüer C.Y. Wu M. Jergas, et al. 1994 Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure Calcif Tissue Int 55 46 52 10.1007/BF00310168 7922789 (Pubitemid 24192837)
10. J.J. Kaufman T.A. Einhorn 1993 Perspectives: ultrasound assessment of bone J Bone Miner Res 8 517 525 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3ovFymsQ%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650080502 8511979 (Pubitemid 23127911)
11. C.F. Njeh C.M. Boivin C.M. Langton 1997 The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review Osteoporos Int 7 7 22 1:STN:280: DyaK2s3is12gtg%3D%3D 10.1007/BF01623454 9102067 (Pubitemid 27077781)
12. T. Fuerst C.C. Glüer H.K. Genant 1995 Quantitative ultrasound Eur J Radiol 20 188 192 1:STN:280:DyaK287itVSisQ%3D%3D 10.1016/0720-048X(95)00650-F 8536746
13. C.V. Flory 1970 The use and interpretation of ponderal index and other weight-height ratios in epidemiological studies J Chron Dis 23 93 103 10.1016/0021-9681(70)90068-8
14. C. Wuster C. Albanese D. De Aloysio, et al. 2000 Phalangeal osteosonogrammetry study: age-related changes, diagnostic sensitivity, and discrimination power J Bone Min Res 15 1603 1614 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3M%2FlsVGksw%3D%3D 10.1359/jbmr.2000.15.8.1603 (Pubitemid 30484531)
15. World Health Organization 1994 Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Report of a WHO Study Group World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 843 1 129
16. V. Ventura M. Mauloni M. Mura, et al. 1996 Ultrasound velocity changes at the proximal phalanges of the hand in pre-, peri- and postmenopausal women Osteoporosis Int 6 368 375 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FosVKqtQ%3D%3D 10.1007/BF01623010 (Pubitemid 26355895)
17. R. Cadossi V. Canè 1996 Pathways of trasmission of ulrasound energy through the distal metaphysis of the second phalanx of pigs: an in vitro study Osteoporosis Int 6 196 206 1:STN:280:DyaK28znslCmsQ%3D%3D 10.1007/BF01622735 (Pubitemid 26171272)
18. V. Cataldi T. Laporta N. Sverzellati, et al. 2008 Detection of incidental vertebral fractures on routine lateral chest radiographs Radiol Med 113 968 977 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1cjot1yktQ%3D%3D 10.1007/s11547-008-0294-1 18795235
19. C.V. Albanese C. Cepollaro F. De Terlizzi, et al. 2009 Performance of five phalangeal QUS parameters in the evaluation of gonadal-status, age and vertebral fracture risk compared with DXA Ultrasound Med & Biol 35 537 544 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.09.027
20. H.K. Genant C.Y. Wu C. van Kuijk M.C. Nevitt 1993 Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique J Bone Miner Res 8 1137 1148 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FlsFyhuw%3D%3D 10.1002/jbmr.5650080915 8237484 (Pubitemid 23261108)
21. J.A. Hanley B.J. McNeil 1982 The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve Radiology 143 29 36 1:STN:280:DyaL387ltFyksQ%3D%3D 7063747 (Pubitemid 12142173)
22. E.W. Gregg A.M. Kriska L.M. Salamone, et al. 1997 The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: A review of the relationship with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk Osteoporos Int 7 89 99 1:STN:280: DyaK2szgvFahsg%3D%3D 10.1007/BF01623682 9166387 (Pubitemid 27192384)
23. F. Hartl A. Tyndall M. Kraenzlin, et al. 2002 Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound parameters and bone mineral density in a populationbased sample of postmenopausal women with vertebral fractures; results of the Basel Osteoporosis Study J Bone Min Res 17 321 330 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FosFSnug%3D%3D 10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.2.321 (Pubitemid 34087665)
24. C.C. Gluer R. Eastell D.M. Reid, et al. 2004 Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices, and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a populationbased sample: the OPUS study J Bone Miner Res 19 782 793 10.1359/jbmr.040304 15068502 (Pubitemid 41094390)
25. S. Gnudi C. Ripamonti 2004 Quantitative ultrasound at the phalanxes discriminates osteoporotic women with vertebral but not with hip fractures Ultras in Med & Biol 30 357 361 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.11.015 (Pubitemid 38456702)
26. P. Alexandersen F. de Terlizzi L.B. Tankó, et al. 2005 Comparison of quantitative ultrasound of the phalanges with conventional bone densitometry in healthy postmenopausal women Osteoporos Int 16 1071 1078 10.1007/s00198-004- 1810-3 15719153 (Pubitemid 41225093)