Values and the conditions of global communication

Current Sociology

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 238-251

  Schulz, Markus S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

deliberation; democracy; globalization; Internet; new media; publics; values

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952307599     PISSN: 00113921     EISSN: 14617064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011392110391160     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abbate J. (1999) Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Apel K.-O(2000) Globalization and the need for universal ethics. European Journal of Social Theory 3(2): 137-155.
3. Arendt H. (1970) On Violence. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace.
4. Baran P. (1964) On Distributed Communications, 12 vols. RAND Report Series. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
5. Bell W. (2003) Foundations of Futures Studies, 2 vols. London: Transaction Publishers.
6. Bijker WE (1995) Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Boulding KE (1969) The interplay of technology and values. In: Baier K and Rescher N (eds) Values and the Future: The Impact of Technological Change on American Values. New York: Free Press.
8. Calhoun C (ed.) (1992) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Castells M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
10. Dewey J. (1927) The Public and its Problems. New York: H Holt.
11. Ellul J. (1964) The Technological Society. New York: Vintage.
12. Elster J. (1983) Explaining Technical Change: A Case Study in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Emirbayer M. and Mische A. (1998) What is agency? American Journal of Sociology 103(4): 962-1023.
14. Giddens A. (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15. Habermas J. (1984/7 [1981]) The Theory of Communicative Action, 2 vols. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
16. Habermas J. (1992 [1962]) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Hargittai E. (2003) Informed web surfing: The social context of user sophistication. In: Howard P and Jones S (eds) Society Online: The Internet in Context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 257-274.
18. Harvey D. (1997) Justice, Nature, and the Geography of Difference. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
19. Herzog R., Hoffmann B. and Schulz MS (2002) Internet und Politik in Lateinamerika: Regulierung und Nutzung der Neuen Informationstechnologien im Kontext der politischen und wirtschaftlichen Transformationen, 6 vols. Frankfurt: Vervuert.
20. Honneth A. (1996) The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts. New York: Polity.
21. Huntington SP (1996) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
22. Innis HA (1951) The Bias of Communication. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
23. ISC (Internet Systems Consortium). (2008) ISC Domain Survey. Available at: www.isc.org/.
24. ITU (International Telecommunication Union). (1999) Challenges to the Network: Internet for Development. Geneva: ITU.
25. ITU (International Telecommunication Union). (2004) Web Survey. Available at: www.itu.int/.
26. ITU (International Telecommunication Union). (2005) World Telecommunication Indicators Database. Geneva: ITU.
27. Jouvenel B. (1967) The Art of Conjecture. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
28. Kubicek H, Dutton W and Williams R (eds) (1997) The Social Shaping of Information Superhighways: European and American Roads to the Information Society. New York: St Martin's Press.
29. Latour B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Lessig L. (2002) The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Vintage.
31. Luke T. (2000) Dealing with the digital divide: The rough realities of cyberspace. Telos 118: 3-23.
32. Lyon D. (2001) Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. London: Open University Press.
33. MacKenzie Do and Wajcman J (eds) (1999) The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd edn. Bucking-ham: Open University Press.
34. McLuhan M. (1964) Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: Signet.
35. Marx K. (1955 [1867]) Capital, Vol. 1: A Critique of Political Economy. New York: Penguin.
36. Miniwatts Marketing Group. (2008) Internet World Stats. Available at: www.internetworldstats.com/.
37. Nissenbaum H. (1998) Values in the design of computer systems. Computers and Society 28(1): 38-39.
38. Odlyzko A. (2001) Internet Growth: Myth and Reality, Use and Abuse. Available at: www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc.
39. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). (2005) OECD Communications Outlook 2005. Paris: OECD.
40. Puckett J., Westervelt S., Guttierrez R. and Takamiya Y. (2005) The Digital Dump: Exporting Re-use and Abuse to Africa. Seattle, WA: BAN (Basel Action Network).
41. Rheingold H. (1993) The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Sassen S. (1997) Cyber-Segmentierungen: Elektronischer Raum und Macht. In: Münker S and Roesler A (eds) Mythos Internet. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
43. Sassen S. (2000) Digital networks and the state: Some governance questions. Theory, Culture and Society 17(4): 19-33.
44. Schulz MS (1998) Collective action across borders: Opportunity structures, network capacities, and communicative praxis in the age of advanced globalization. Sociological Perspectives 41(3): 587-616.
45. Schulz MS (2001a) Democracia y cambio de los medios en América Latina. Perfiles Latinoamericanos 10(18): 9-28.
46. Schulz MS (2001b) Political violence, human rights, and military strategy: The Mexican case. Forum International 22: 293-328.
47. Schulz MS (2001c) Die dynamischen Netze der Öffentlichkeit: Struktur, Dynamik und Effektivität politischer Telekommunikation. In: Jarren O, Imhof K and Blum R (eds) Zerfall der Öffentlichkeit? Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, 266-281.
48. Schulz MS (2002) Mexiko zwischen Demokratisierung und Liberalisierung: Internet und Politik in Lateinamerika, Vol. 4. Frankfurt: Vervuert.
49. Sell SK (2003) Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Simmel G. (2004 [1900]) The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge.
51. Swidler A. (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review 51(2): 273-286.
52. Tocqueville A. (1990 [1835/40]) Democracy in America, 2 vols. New York: Vintage.
53. UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law). (1998) UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce with Guide to Enactment (1996), with additional article 5 bis as adopted in 1998. Available at: www.uncitral.org/.
54. US Department of Commerce. (1995) Falling through the Net: A Survey of the 'Have Nots' in Rural and Urban America. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
55. US Department of Commerce. (1998) Falling through the Net: New Data on the Digital Divide. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
56. US Department of Commerce. (2000) Falling through the Net: Toward Digital Inclusion. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
57. Vaidhyanathan S. (2003) Copyrights and Copywrongs: The Rise of Intellectual Property and How it Threatens Creativity. New York: NYU Press.
58. Weber M. (2002 [1904/5]) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Los Angeles: Roxbury.
59. Wellman B (ed.) (1999) Networks in the Global Village. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
60. White HC (1993) Values come in styles, which mate to change. In: Hechter M, Nadel L and Michod R (eds) The Origins of Values. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 63-91.
61. White L. (1966) Medieval Technology and Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Wilson EJ III and Kahin B (eds) (1997) National Information Infrastructure Initiatives: Vision and Policy Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. Zakon RH (2002) Hobbes' Internet Timeline v5.0. Available at: info.isoc.org/.