Toxicity of water-soluble fractions of biodiesel fuels derived from castor oil, palm oil, and waste cooking oil

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 893-897

  Leite, Maria Bernadete Neiva Lemos ^a   de Araújo, Milena Maria Sampaio ^b   Nascimento, Iracema Andrade ^a,d   da Cruz, Andrea Cristina Santos ^a   Pereira, Solange Andrade ^a   do Nascimento, Núbia Costa ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF BAHIA   (Brazil)

^b University of the State of Bahia   (Brazil)

^c Federal Institute of Bahia   (Brazil)

^d Av Oceânica 2353/ 403 Ondina 40140 131 Salvador ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biodiesel; Marine; Methanol; Risk evaluation; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

BIO-DIESEL FUEL; BIODIESEL INDUSTRY; CASTOR OIL; CLIMATIC CONDITIONS; COASTAL AREA; ENERGY DEMANDS; ENGINE PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS; HIGH POTENTIAL; MARINE; MARINE ORGANISMS; MICRO-ALGAE; PALM OIL; POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS; RENEWABLE SOURCES; RISK EVALUATION; SEA URCHIN; TEST ORGANISMS; TOXICITY TEST; TRANSPORT SECTORS; WASTE COOKING OIL; WATER SOLUBLE FRACTION; WATERBODIES;

COASTAL ZONES; DIESEL FUELS; EFFLUENTS; EXHAUST SYSTEMS (ENGINE); FOSSIL FUELS; GAS EMISSIONS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; MACHINE DESIGN; MAMMALS; MARINE BIOLOGY; METHANOL; METHANOL FUELS; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES; SYNTHETIC FUELS; TOXICITY; VEGETABLE OILS;

BIODIESEL;

BIODIESEL; CASTOR OIL; METHANOL; PALM OIL;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; BIOFUEL; DIESEL ENGINE; ECHINODERM; ENERGY USE; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; FOSSIL FUEL; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GAS; GROWTH RATE; INHIBITION; LIFE CYCLE; MARINE POLLUTION; METHANOL; MICROALGA; OIL SPILL; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RUNOFF; TOXICITY; TOXICITY TEST; VEGETABLE OIL;

ARTICLE; BRAZIL; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FUNGUS GROWTH; IC 50; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; MICROALGA; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEA URCHIN; TOXICITY TESTING; TRANSESTERIFICATION; WATER CONTAMINATION;

ANIMALS; BIOFUELS; CASTOR OIL; CHLOROPHYTA; COOKING; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; PLANT OILS; SEA URCHINS; SOLUBILITY; WASTE PRODUCTS; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

BRAZIL;

ECHINOIDEA; ELAEIS;

EID: 79952306862     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.444     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. IPIntergovernmental Panel of Climate Change. 2007. WMO/UNEP/IPCC. 4th Assessment Report. AR4 Synthesis Report. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, p 52.
2. Haas MJ, McAloon AJ, Yee WC, Foglia TA. 2006. A process model to estimate biodiesel production costs. Bioresour Technol 97: 671-678.
3. World Bank Group. 2004. Annual Review of Development Effectiveness. Washington, DC.
4. Agarwal D, Sinha S, Agarwal AK. 2006. Experimental investigation of control of NOx emissions in biodiesel-fueled compression ignition engine. Renewable Energy 31: 2356-2369.
5. Cardone M, Prati MV, Rocco V, Seggiani M, Senatore A, Vitolo S. 2002. Brassica carinata as an alternative oil crop for the production of biodiesel in Italy:engine performance and regulated and unregulated exhaust emissions. Environ Sci Technol 36: 4656-4662.
6. Sharp CA, Howell SA, Jobe J. 2000. The effects of biodiesel fuels on transient emissions from modern diesel engines. Part II. Unregulated emissions and chemical characterization. SAE Technical Paper 2000-1- 1968. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA, USA.
7. Leung DYC, Koo BCP, Guo Y. 2006. Degradation of biodiesel under different storage conditions. Bioresour Technol 97: 250-256.
8. Yang L, Lai C-T, Shieh WK. 2000. Biodegradation of dispersed diesel fuel under high salinity condition. Water Res 34: 3303-3314.
9. Sheehan J, Camobreco V, Duffield J, Graboski M, Shapouri H. 1998. An overview of biodiesel and petroleum diesel life cycles. Report of National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U. S. Department of Energy (DOE). Task BF886002. U. S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
10. Bünger J, Krahl J, Franke H-UF, Munach A, Hallier E. 1998. Mutagenic and cytotoxic effects of exhaust particulate matter of biodiesel compared to fossil diesel. Mutat Res 415: 13-23.
11. Carlier P, Hannachi H, Mouvier G. 1986. The chemistry of carbonyls in the atmosphere- a review. Atmos Environ 20: 2079-2099.
12. Pang X, Shi X, Mu Y, He H, Shuai S, Chen H, Li R. 2006. Characteristics of carbonyl compounds emission from a diesel-engine using biodiesel-ethanol-diesel as fuel. Atmos Environ 40: 7057-7065.
13. Turrio-Baldassarri L, Battistelli CL, Conti L, Crebelli R, De Berardis B, Iamiceli AL, Gambino M, Iannaccone S. 2004. Emission comparison of urban bus engine fueled with diesel oil and biodiesel blend. Sci Total Environ 327: 147-162.
14. Corrêa SM, Arbilla G. 2006. Aromatic hydrocarbons emissions in diesel and biodiesel exhausts. Atmos Environ 40: 6821-6826.
15. Nascimento IA, Pereira SA, Leite MBNL, da Cruz AC, Santos JM, Barros DA, Veras TF, Alvarez HM, Nascimento MA. 2009. Is biodiesel an eco-compatible fuel? Toxicity estimation to organisms of different trophic levels. In Newbury H, De Lorne W, eds, Industrial Pollution Including Oil. Nova Science, New York, NY, USA, pp 61-90.
16. ANP-National Agency for Oil, Natural Gas and Biofuels. 2009. Statistical data. Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
17. Zhang Y, Dubé MA, McLean DD, Kates M. 2003. Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil: 1-Process design and technological assessment. Bioresour Technol 89: 1-16.
18. Lapinskienè A, Martinkus P, Rebzdaité V. 2006. Eco-toxicological studies of diesel and biodiesel fuels in aerated soil. Environ Pollut 142: 432-437.
19. Chapman PM. 1997. The precautionary principle and ecological quality standards/objectives. Mar Pollut Bull 34: 227-228.
20. Chapman PM. 1999. Risk assessment and the precautionary principle: A time and a place. Mar Pollut Bull 38: 944-947.
21. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1984. Drilling fluid's toxicity test. Fed Reg 50: 34631-34636.
22. Nascimento IA, Sousa ECPM, Nipper M. 2002. Métodos em Ecotoxicologia Marinha:aplicações no Brasil. Ed. Artes Gráficas e Indústria Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil.
23. Araújo MMS, Nascimento IA. 1999. Marine ecotoxicological tests: Precision analysis. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Restoration 1: 41-47.
24. American Society for Testing and Materials. 1995. Standard guide for conducting static acute toxicity tests with echinoid embryos. E 1563-95. West Conshohocken, PA, pp 962-980.
25. Nascimento NC, Nascimento IA e Melo SLR. 2008. Testes de precisão ecotoxicológicos em Echinometra lucunter Echinodermata:Chinoidea): Caracterização da sensibilidade embriolarval a variações de fatores ambientais. Diálogos & Ciência 6: 105-121.
26. Finney DJ. 1971. Probit Analysis 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press, London, UK, p 333.
27. Hamilton MA, Russo RC, Thurston RV. 1977. Trimmed Spearman-Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity biossays. Environ Sci Technol 11: 714-719.
28. Graphpad Software. 1997. Instant guide to choosing and interpreting statistical tests. San Diego, CA, USA.
29. Paixão JF, Nascimento IA, Pereira SA, Leite MBL, Rodrigues ILP. 2007. Estimating the gasoline components and formulations toxicity to microalgae (Tetraselmis chuii) and oyster (Crassostrea rhizophorae) embryos: An approach to minimize environmental pollution risk. Environ Res 103: 365-374.
30. Martins LK, Nascimento IA, Fillmann G, King R, Depledge M, Readman J, Evangelista AJA. 2005. Lysosomal responses as diagnostic tool for the detection of oil chronic pollution at Todos os Santos bay. Environ Res 98: 387-396.
31. Depledge MH. 1994. The rational basis for the use of biomarkers as ecotoxicological tools. In Fossi MC, Leonzio C, eds, Nondestructive Biomarkers of Higher Vertebrates. Lewis, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp 271-295.
32. Beiras R, Bellas J, Fernández N, Lorenzo JI, Cobelo-García A. 2003. Assessment of coastal marine pollution in Galicia (NW Iberian Peninsula): Metal concentrations in seawater, sediments and mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) versus embryo-larval bioassays using Paracentrotus lividus and Ciona intestinalis Mar Environ Res 56: 531-553.
33. Kobayashi N. 1990. Marine pollution bioassay by sea urchin eggs, an attempt to enhance sensitivity. Publ Seto Mar Biol Lab 34: 225-237.
34. Nascimento IA, Smith DH, Pereira SA, Araújo MMS, Mariani AM. 2000. Integration of varying responses of different organisms to water and sediment quality at sites impacted and not impacted by the petroleum industry. State of Brazilian Aquatic Ecosystem. Aquat Ecosys Health Manag 3: 449-458.
35. Roel AR, Vendramim JD, Frighetto RTS, Frighetto N. 2000. Toxic effects of the organic extracts of Trichilia pallida Swartz (Meliaceae) on Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith). Anais da Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil 29: 67-98.