The complementary nature of geophysical survey methods

Seeing the Unseen - Geophysics and Landscape Archaeology

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 183-199

  Watters, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARCHAEOLOGICAL FEATURES; GEOPHYSICAL METHODS; GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS; PROJECT PLANNING; SURVEY METHODS; SURVEY PROJECTS;

GEOLOGICAL SURVEYS; HISTORY;

GEOPHYSICS;

EID: 79952287162     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (55)

1. Annan, P. & J. Davis. 1976. Impulse Radar soundings in permafrost. Radio Science 11:383-394.
2. Atkinson, R. 1952. Méthodes eléctriques de prospection en archéologie, in A. Laming (ed.). La Découverte du Passé, Picard, Paris.
3. Barker, R. 1993. A simple algorithm for electrical imaging of the subsurface. First Break 10(2):53-62.
4. Barringer, A. 1965. Research directed to the determination of subsurface terrain properties and ice thickness by pulsed VHF propagation methods. Air Force Cambridge Research Laboratories contribution AF19 (628) 2998.
5. Bevan, B. & J. Kenyon. 1975. Ground probing radar for historical archaeology. MASCA Newsletter 11:2-7.
6. Breiner, S. 1973. Applications Manual for Portable Magnetometers. Sunnyvale: Geometries.
7. Buteaux, S., H. Chapman & M. Hewson. Forthcoming. Where Rivers Meet. The Catholme ceremonial complex and the archaeology of the Trent-Tame confluence, Staffordshire.
8. Campbell, K. & A. Orange. 1974. A continuous profile of sea ice and freshwater ice thickness by impulse radar. Polar Record 17(106):31-41.
9. Clark, A. 1996. Seeing Beneath the Soil, Revised Edition. London: B.T. Batsford Ltd.
10. Conyers, L. & D. Goodman. 1997. Ground-Penetrating Radar: An Introduction for Archaeologists. Walnut Creek, Calif.: AltaMira Press.
11. Cook, J. 1960. Proposed monocycle-pulse VHF radar for airborne ice and snow measurements, in AIEE Trans. Commun. and Electron. 79(2):588-594.
12. Dabas, M., A. Hesse & J. Tabbagh. 2000. Experimental resistivity survey at Wroxeter archaeological site with a fast and light recording device. Archaeological Prospection 7:107-118.
13. Dabas, M. 2006. Theory and practice of the new fast electrical imaging system ARP©, presented at the XV International Summer School in Archaeology, Geophysics for Landscape Archaeology, Grosseto, 10-18 July.
14. Daniels, J. 2000. Ground Penetrating Radar Fundamentals, prepared as an appendix to a report to the U.S. EPA, Region V, Nov. 25, 2000.
15. David, A. 1995. Geophysical survey in archaeological field evaluation, Research and Professional Services Guideline No. 1. London: English Heritage.
16. De Terra, H., J. Romero &T. Stewart. 1949. The TepexpanMaa Viking Fund Publications in Archaeology 11. New York: Werner-Grenn Foundation.
17. Evans, T. 2006. "Ritual Monuments and Natural places: An Assessment of the Early Neolithic and Early Bronze Age landscape architecture at the confluence of the Rivers Trent, Tame and Mease, Staffordshire." Unpublished MA Dissertation. University of Birmingham, UK.
18. Gaffhey, C. & J. Gater. 2003. Revealing the Buried Past, Geophysics for Archaeologists. Stroud: Tempus Publishing Ltd.
19. Goodman, D. & Y. Nishimura. 1992b. Radar archaeometry and the use of synthetic radargrams to investigate burial grounds in Japan in Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Archaeometry, Los Angeles: 167.
20. Goodman, D. & Y. Nishimura. 1993. A ground-radar view of Japanese burial mounds. Antiquity 67:349-354.
21. Griffiths, D. & R. King. 1981. Applied Geophysics for Geologists & Engineers. London: Pergamon Press.
22. Hallof, R. 1957. "On the Interpretation of Resistivity and Induced Polarization Measurements." PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
23. Hewson, M., E. Hancox & K. Bain. 2005. Catholme Ritual Landscape Ground Truthing Project 2004: Post-excavation assessment. Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (ALSF) Where Rivers Meet Phase II Report 1. London: English Heritage.
24. Houndslow, M. & V Karloukovski. 2005. Where Rivers Meet: Landscape, Ritual and Settlement and the Archaeology of River Gravels, Report for Magnetic Properties, Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (ALSF) Where Rivers Meet Phase II Report 4. London: English Heritage.
25. Jordan, D. 2005. Where Rivers Meet: Landscape, Ritual and Settlement and the Archaeology of River Gravels. The Geoarchaeology of Deposits at Catholme. Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (ALSF) Where Rivers Meet Phase IIReport 3. London: English Heritage.
26. Keary, P., M. Brooks & I. Hill. 2002. An Introduction to Geophysical Exploration, Third Edition. Oxford: Blackwell.
27. Kenyon, J. 1977. Ground-Penetrating Radar and Its Application to a Historical Archaeological Site. Historical Archaeology 11:48-55.
28. Leckebusch, J. 2003. Ground Penetrating Radar: A Modern Three-dimensional Prospection Method. Archaeological Prospection 10:213-240.
29. Leckebusch, J. & R. Peikert. 2001. Investigating the True Resolution and Three-dimensional Capabilities of Ground-penetrating Radar Data in Archaeological Surveys: Measurements in a Sand Box. Archaeological Prospection 8:29-40.
30. Loke, M. 2004. Tutorial: 2-D and 3-D electrical imaging surveys. Geotomo.
31. Loke, M. & R. Barker. 1996a. Rapid least squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method. Geophysical Prospecting 48:181-152.
32. Loke, M. & R. Barker. 1996b. Practical techniques for 3D resistivity surveys and data inversion. Geophysical Prospecting 44:499-523.
33. Loke, M. & T. Dahlin. 2002. A comparison of the Gauss-Newton and quasi-Newton methods in resistivity imaging inversion. Journal of Applied Geophysics 49(3): 149-162. (Pubitemid 34817194)
34. Morey, R. 1974. Continuous subsurface profiling by impulse radar, in Proceedings of the Engineering Foundation Conference on Subsurface Exploration for Underground Excavation and Heavy Construction. American Society of Civil Engineers: 213-232.
35. Mussett, A. & M. Khan. 2000. Looking Into the Earth, an Introduction to Geological Geophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Neubauer, W., A. Eder-Hinterleitner, S. Seren & P. Melichar. 2002. Georadar in the Roman Civil Town Car-nuntum, Austria: An Approach for Archaeological Interpretation of GPR Data. Archaeological Prospection 9:135-156.
37. Olhoeft, G. 2000. Maximizing the information return from ground penetrating radar. Journal of Applied Geophysics 43:175-187. (Pubitemid 30205930)
38. Panissod, C, M. Dabas, N. Florsch, A. Hesse, A. Jolivet, A. Tabbagh & J. Tabbagh. 1998. Archaeological Prospecting using Electric and Electrostatic Mobile Arrays. Archaeological Prospection 5:239-251.
39. Scollar I., A. Tabbagh, A. Hesse & I. Herzog. 1990. Archaeological Prospecting and Remote Sensing: Topics in Remote Sensing, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Tsourlos, P. 1995. "Modelling interpretation and inversion of multi-electrode resistivity survey data." Ph.D. Thesis. University of York.
41. Tsourlos, P. & R. Ogilvy. 1999. An algorithm for the 3-D Inversion of Tomographic Resistivity and Induced Polarization data: Preliminary Results. Journal of the Balkan Geophysical Society 2(2):30-45.
42. Vickers, R. & L. Dolphin 1975. A Communication on an Archaeological Radar Experiment at Chaco Canyon, New Mexico. MASCA Newsletter 11(l):6-8.
43. Vickers, R., L. Dolphin & D. Johnson. 1976. Archaeological Investigations at Chaco Canyon Using a Subsurface Radar, inT. Lyons (ed.). Remote Sensing Experiments in Cultural Resource Studies at Chaco Canyon. Albuquerque, New Mexico: USDI-NPS and the University of New Mexico: 81-101.
44. Walker, R. & P. Linford. 2006. Resistance and Magnetic surveying with the MSP40 Mobile Sensor Platform at Kelmarsh Hall. ISAP News 9:3-5.
45. Watters, M. 1999. Geophysical Work Conducted with the Geometries G858 Cesium Vapor Magnetometer at Effigy Mounds National Monument, IA. As part of the U.S. National Park Service Workshop: "Recent Advances in Archeological Prospection Techniques," May 10-14,1999. Submitted to the Midwest Archeological Center, U.S. National Park Service, Lincoln, Nebraska.
46. Watters, M. 2004. Where Rivers Meet: Geophysical Survey At Catholme. Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (ALSF) Where Rivers Meet Phase I Report 5. London: English Heritage.
47. Watters, M. 2005. Wliere Rivers Meet: Geophysical Survey At Catholme. Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund (ALSF) Where Rivers Meet Phase IIReport 2. London: English Heritage.
48. Watters, M. 2007. "New Methods for archaeo-geophysical data visualization." Ph.D. Thesis. University of Birmingham, UK.
49. Weymouth, J. 1986. Geophysical Methods of Site Surveying, inM. Schiffer (ed.). Advances in Archaeological Method and Theoiy, Vol. 9. London: Academic Press.
50. Web 1: Archaeo-physics http://www.archaeophysics.com/methods/index.html
51. Web 2: Forum Novum ArcIMS http://ccc286.bham.ac.uk/website/fnv/fnvframe1. htm
52. Web 3: ADS Geophysical Data in Archaeology: A Guide to Good Practice http://ads.ahds.ac.uklprojectlgoodguides/geophys/
53. Web 4: English Heritage Geophysical Survey Database http://sdb2.eng-h. gov.uk/
54. Web 5: North American Database of Archaeological Geophysics http://www.cast.uark.edu/nadag/
55. Web 6: Archaeo-Imaging Lab http://www.cast.uark.edu/~kkvamme/Archeolmage/ archeo-image.htm