Metrics for quantifying the similarities and differences between IFC files

Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 172-181

  Lee, Ghang ^a   Won, Jongsung ^a   Ham, Sungil ^a   Shin, Yuna ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Addition rate; Compare; GUID preservation rate; IFC; Interoperability; Matching rate; Missing rate; Similarity rate

Indexed keywords

ADDITION RATE; COMPARE; GUID PRESERVATION RATE; IFC; MATCHING RATE; MISSING RATE; SIMILARITY RATE;

INTEROPERABILITY;

EID: 79952287133     PISSN: 08873801     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000077     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Acrobat 9 Pro Extended. [Computer software]. San Jose, CA, Adobe Systems.
2. AllPlan 2006. [Computer software]. Columbia, MD, Nemetshek Vectorworks.
3. Amor, R., and Ma, H. (2006). Preservation of meaning in mapped IFCs.. Proc., European Conf. on Product and Process Modeling (ECPPM), 233-236.
4. ArchiCAD 9. [Computer software]. Budapest, Hungary, Graphisoft.
5. ArchiCAD 10. [Computer software]. Budapest, Hungary, Graphisoft.
6. buildingSMART. (2007). A selection of IFC2x3 test cases.. http://www.iai.hm.edu/how-to-implement-ifc/certification/test-cases/ ifc2x3-coordination-view/building-elements (July 13, 2009).
7. buildingSMART. (2009). Industry foundation classes.. http:// buildingsmart.com/bim (June 19, 2009).
8. Compare P21. [Computer software]. Seoul, Korea, Building Informatics Group, Dept. of Architecture, Yonsei University, http://big.yonsei.ac.kr:8080/ comparep21.php (July 19, 2009).
9. Constructor 2007. [Computer software]. Boulder, CO, Vico Software.
10. DDS-CAD Viewer 6.5. [Computer software]. Klepp Stasjon, Norway, Data Design System ASA.
11. Eberg, E., (2006). Experiences in development and use of a digital Building Information Model (BIM) according to IFC standards from the building project of Troms University College (HITOS) after completed Full Conceptual Design Phase., Statsbygg-Norwegian Agency of Public Construction and Property, Oslo, Norway.
12. Gielingh, W. (2008). An assessment of the current state of product data technologies.. Comput.-Aided Des., 40 (7), 750-759.
13. IFCwiki. (2009). IFC-certified software.. http://www.ifcwiki.org/index. php/IFC-Certified-Software (June 29, 2009).
14. ISO/TC 184/SC4. (1994 a). Industrial automation systems and integration-Product data representation and exchange-Part 1: Overview and fundamental principles.. ISO 10303-1:1994, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva.
15. ISO/TC 184/SC4. (1994 b). Industrial automation systems and integration-Product data representation and exchange-Part 11: Description methods: The EXPRESS language reference manual.. ISO 10303-11:1994, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva.
16. ISO/TC 184/SC4. (2002). Industrial automation systems and integration-Product data representation and exchange-Part 21: Implementation methods: Clear text encoding of the exchange structure.. ISO 10303-21:2002, International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva.
17. Jeong, Y. S., Eastman, C. M., Sacks, R., and Kaner, I. (2009) Benchmark tests for BIM data exchanges of precast concrete.. Autom. Constr., 18 (4), 469-484. 0926-5805 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.11.001
18. Kam, C., and Fischer, M. (2004). Capitalizing on early project decision-making opportunities to improve facility design, construction, and life-cycle performance-POP, PM4D, and decision dashboard approaches.. Autom. Constr., 13 (1), 53-65. 0926-5805 10.1016/j.autcon.2003.08.004
19. Kiviniemi, A., Tarandi, V., Karlshj, J., Bell, H., and Karud, O. J. (2008). Review of the development and implementation of IFC compatible BIM., Erabuild Funding Organizations, Europe.
20. Lee, G. (2011). What information can or cannot be exchanged? J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 0887-3801, 25 (1), 1-9.
21. Lee, G., Eastman, C. M., and Sacks, R. (2007). Eliciting information for product modeling using process modeling.. Data & Knowledge Engineering 0169-023X, 62 (2), 292-307. 10.1016/j.datak.2006.08.005 (Pubitemid 46670506)
22. Lee, G., Sacks, R., and Eastman, C. M. (2002). Dynamic information consistency checking in the requirements analysis phase of data modeling.. eWork and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction-European Conference for Process and Product Modeling (ECPPM), A. A. Balkema, The Netherlands, 285-291.
23. Lim, J.-I., Kim, J.-W., Kwon, H.-D., Yoon, S.-W., Kwon, S.-W., and Chin, S.-Y. (2008). IFC test between commercial 3D CAD application using IFC.. J. Korea Inst. of Constr. Eng. Manage., 9 (3), 10.
24. Ma, H., Ha, K. M. E., Chung, C. K. J., and Amor, R. (2006) Testing semantic interoperability.. Proc., Joint Intl. Conf. on Computing and Decision Making in Civil and Building Engineering (JICCDMCBE), Montreal, Canada.
25. Microstation Triforma. [Computer software]. Exton, PA, Bentley Systems.
26. Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows, Open University Press, Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK.
27. Pazlar, T., and Turk, Z. (2008). Interoperability in practice: Geometric data exchange using the IFC standard.. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 1874-4753, 13, 362-380.
28. Revit Architecture 2008. [Computer software]. San Rafael, CA, Autodesk.
29. Revit Building 9. [Computer software]. San Rafael, CA, Autodesk.
30. Tekla Structures. [Computer software]. Espoo, Finland, Tekla Corp.
31. Wix, J. (2005). Information Delivery Manual (IDM): Enabling information exchange in AEC/FM business processes, Jeffrey Wix Consulting, Thatcham, UK.