The National Bowel Cancer Audit Project: What do trusts think of the National Bowel Cancer Audit and how can it be improved?

Techniques in Coloproctology

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 53-59

  Cornish, J A ^a   Tilney, H S ^a   Tan, E ^a   Thompson, M R ^b   Smith, J J ^c   Tekkis, P P ^a  

^a ST MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c CHELSEA AND WESTMINSTER HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bowel cancer; Feedback; National audit

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT; INTESTINE CANCER; MEDICAL AUDIT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SURGEON; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; IRELAND; MEDICAL AUDIT; PHYSICIANS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 79952282754     PISSN: 11236337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10151-010-0661-5     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. MP Coleman G Gatta A Verdecchia, et al. 2003 EUROCARE-3 summary: cancer survival in Europe at the end of the 20th century Ann Oncol 14 Suppl 5 128v 149v
2. A Engeland T Haldorsen PW Dickman, et al. 1998 Relative survival of cancer patients-a comparison between Denmark and the other Nordic countries Acta Oncol 37 49 59 1:STN:280:DyaK1c3jt1eltQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28179800)
3. Improving Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer: National Institute of Clinical Excellence, 2004
4. M Garout HS Tilney PP Tekkis P Aylin 2008 Comparison of administrative data with the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) colorectal cancer database Int J Colorectal Dis 23 155 163 (Pubitemid 350302511)
5. www.drfosterhealth.co.uk/hospital-guide Hospital Guide. Volume 2007
6. www.sunday-times.co.uk. Good Hospital Guide. The Sunday Times. London, 2003:96
7. MR Philipson MJ Westwood JM Geoghegan APJ Henry CD Jefferiss 2005 Shortcomings of the National Joint Registry: a survey of consultants' views Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87 109 112 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M7ptlSiug%3D%3D discussion 112 (Pubitemid 40394361)
8. R Smith 1998 All changed, changed utterly. British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case BMJ 316 1917 1918 1:STN:280:DyaK1czgs1SrtA%3D%3D
9. B O'Neill 2000 Doctor as murderer. Death certification needs tightening up, but it still might not have stopped Shipman BMJ 320 329 330
10. GM Teasdale Council of the Society of British Neurological Surgeons 2002 Learning from Bristol-the report of the public inquiry into children's heart surgery at the Bristol Royal Infirmary (1984-1995) Br J Neurosurg 16 155 456
11. E Onel C Hamond JH Wasson, et al. 1998 Assessment of the feasibility and impact of shared decision making in prostate cancer Urology 51 63 66 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7hvVKitA%3D%3D (Pubitemid 28092507)
12. JH Burack P Impellizzeri P Homel JN Cunningham Jr 1999 Public reporting of surgical mortality: a survey of New York State cardiothoracic surgeons Ann Thorac Surg 68 1195 1200 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FgvVyhtg%3D%3D discussion 1201-1202
13. PP Tekkis JD Poloniecki MR Thompson JD Stamatakis 2003 Operative mortality in colorectal cancer: prospective national study BMJ 327 1196 1201