Percutaneous vertebral augmentation: Stabilitit™ a new delivery system for vertebral fractures

Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplementum

Volumn , Issue 108, 2011, Pages 191-195

  Robertson, Scott C ^a,b  

^a Bone and Joint Hospital   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Bone cement; Osteoporosis; Percutaneous vertebroplasty; Vertebral augmentation; Vertebral fractures

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; RADIOFREQUENCY; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTEBRA FRACTURE; DISABILITY; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM; FOLLOW UP; INSTRUMENTATION; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; SPINE FRACTURE;

BONE CEMENTS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; SPINAL FRACTURES; VERTEBROPLASTY;

EID: 79952278635     PISSN: 00651419     EISSN: 00016268     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-99370-5_29     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Alvarez L, Alcaraz M, Perez-Higueras A, Granizo J, et al. (2006) Percutaneous vertebroplasty. Spine 31(10); 1113-1118.
2. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, et al. (1987) Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic verteb-roplasty [in French]. Neurochirurgie 33; 166-168.
3. Harrop J, Prpa B, Reinhardt M, Lieberman I (2004) Primary and secondary osteoporosis' incidence of subsequent vertebral com¬pression fractures after kyphoplasty. Spine 29(19); 2120-2125. (Pubitemid 40353200)
4. Hulme P, Krebs J, Ferguson S, Berlemann U (2006) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of 69 clinical studies. Spine 31(17); 1983-2001. (Pubitemid 44297781)
5. Kim D, Vaccaro A (2006) Osteoporotic compression fractures of the spine; current options and considerations for treatment. Spine J 6; 479-487.
6. Kiner D, Wybo C, Sterba W, et al. (2008) Biomechanical analysis of different techniques in revision spinal instrumentation: larger diam¬eter screws versus cement augmentation. Spine 33(24); 2618-2622.
7. Majd M, Farley S, Holt R (2005) Preliminary outcomes and efficacy of the first 360 consecutive kyphoplasties for the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine J 5; 244-255. (Pubitemid 40613664)
8. Miko L, Szikora I, Grohs J, Murphy K (2009) Initial experience with radio-frequency based vertebral augmentation in treatment of vertebral compression fractures. 34th Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society of Interventional Radiology. San Diego, California (Abstract).
9. Murphy K, Wong E, Poser R, Kohm A (2009) Comparison of intravertebral pressure and height restoration in three minimally invasive treatments of vertebral compression fractures. 34th Annu¬al Scientific Meeting of Society of Interventional Radiology. San Diego, California (Abstract).
10. Raley T, Poser R, Kohm A (2008) Comparative height restoration-cadaveric analysis of innovative energy modulated vertebral aug¬mentation system. Spine Technology Education Group Meeting. Los Cabos, Mexico. http://www.medostar.org/steg/index.php
11. Raley T, Poser R, Kohm A (2009) Comparative height restoration of three vertebral augmentation systems for treatment of vertebral compression fractures. 55th Annual Meeting of the ORS, Las Vegas, Nevada (Abstract).
12. Wong E, Poser R, Kohm A (2009) Effect of viscosity on lifting force and extravasation in a defect model. 55th Annual Meeting of the ORS, Las Vegas, Nevada (Abstract).