Auditory results from cochlear implants in elderly people

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

Volumn 76, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 450-453

  Oyanguren, Valéria ^a   Gomes, Maria Valéria Goffi ^a   Tsuji, Robinson Koji ^a   Bento, Ricardo Ferreira ^a   Neto, Rubens Brito ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Health of the elderly; Hearing

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPEECH AUDIOMETRY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION TESTS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79952278098     PISSN: 18088694     EISSN: 18088686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1808-86942010000400008     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [Internet] Bra-sília (DF); Disponível em http://www.ibge.gov.br. Acessado em Julho/2009.
2. Raina P, Wong M, Massfeller H. The relationship between sensory impairment and functional independence among elderly. BMC Ge-riatr. [periódico online] 2004;4:3.
3. Savikko N, Routasalo P, Tilvis RS, Strandberg TE, Pitkala KH. Predictors and subjective causes of loneliness in an aged population. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. [periódico online] 2005;41(3):223-33.
4. Russo IEP, Almeida K, Freire KGM. Seleção e adaptação da prótese auditiva para o idoso. In: Almeida K, Iório MEM. Próteses auditivas: fundamentos teóricos e aplicações clínicas. 2.d. São Paulo: Lovise; 2003. p. 385-410.
5. Bento RF, Brito Neto R, Castilho AM, Goffi-Gomez MVS, Giorgi SB, Guedes MC. Resultados auditivos com o implante coclear multicanal em pacientes submetidos a cirurgia no HCFMUSP. Rev Bras Otorri-nolaringol. 2004;70(5)632-7.
6. Bento RF, Miniti A, Leiner A, Sanchez TG, Oshiro MS, Campos MIM, Goffi-Gomez MVS, Nunes CAS, Oyama HTT. O implante coclear FMUSP-1: apresentação de um programa brasileiro e seus resultados preliminares. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 1994;60:1-16.
7. Goffi-Gomez MVS, Guedes MC, Sant'Anna SBG, Peralta CGO, Tsuji RK, Castilho AM et al. Critérios de seleção e avaliação médica e au-diológica dos candidatos ao implante coclear: Protocolo HCFMUSP. Arq Otorrinolaringol. 2004;7(3):197-204.
8. Pasanisi E, Bacciu A, Vincenti V, Guida M, Barbot A, Berghenti M. T, Bacciu S, et al. Speech recognition in elderly cochlear implant recipients. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003;28(2)154-7.
9. Djalilian HR, Smith SL, King SC. Cochlear implantation in the elderly: results and quality-of-life assessment. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002;111 (10):890-95.
10. Orabi AA, Mawman D, Al-Zoubi F, Saeed SR. Cochlear implant outcomes and quality of life in the elderly: Manchester experience over 13 years. Clin Otolaryngol. 2006;31(2):116-22.
11. Vermeire K, Brokx PL, Wuyts FL, Cochet E. Quality-of-Life Benefit from Cochlear Implantation in the Elderly. Otol Neurotol. 2005;26(2):188-95.
12. Gatehouse S. The contribution of central auditory factors to auditory disability. Acta Otolaryngol. 1991;476:182-8.
13. Jerger J, Chimiel R, Allen J, Wilson A. Effects of age and gender on dichotic sentence identification. Ear Hear. 1994;15(4):273-350.
14. Cheesman MF, Hepburn D, Armitage JC, Marshall K. Comparison of growth of masking functions and speech discrimination abilities in younger and older adults. Audiology. 1995;34(6):321-33.
15. Magalhães ATM, Goff Gomez MVS. Índice de Reconhecimento de Fala na Presbiacusia. i- Int Otorrinolaringol. 2007;11(2):169-74.
16. Sanchez ML, Nunes FB, Barros F, Ganança MM, Caovilla HH. Ava-liação do processamento auditivo em idosos que relatam ouvir bem. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;74(6):896-902.