Challenges, controversies, and hot topics in pulmonary embolism imaging

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 196, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 497-515

  Sadigh, Gelareh ^a   Kelly, Aine Marie ^a,b   Cronin, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HOSPITALS   (United States)

^b VA ANN ARBOR HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

CT; Pulmonary embolism; Radiation dosage; Ventilation perfusion ratio; Ventricular dysfunction

Indexed keywords

ANTICOAGULANT AGENT; CONTRAST MEDIUM; CORTICOSTEROID; D DIMER; FIBRINOLYTIC AGENT; HIGH OSMOLAR CONTRAST MEDIUM; IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM; IONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM; LOW OSMOLAR CONTRAST MEDIUM; NONIONIC CONTRAST MEDIUM; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANAPHYLAXIS; ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; BLOOD LEVEL; CARDIAC GATED IMAGING; CARDIOVASCULAR DECOMPENSATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CATHETER PULMONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC VENOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST INDUCED NEPHROPATHY; CORTICOSTEROID THERAPY; CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY; DRUG SAFETY; DUAL ENERGY PULMONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DUAL SOURCE PULMONARY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ELECTRON BEAM TOMOGRAPHY; FIBRINOLYTIC THERAPY; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; KIDNEY FAILURE; LUNG ANGIOGRAPHY; LUNG EMBOLISM; LUNG SCINTISCANNING; LUNG VENTILATION PERFUSION SCINTIGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANT WOMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PULMONARY MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION HAZARD; REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; TERATOGENICITY; VEIN THROMBOSIS; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; WELLS SCORE;

ANGIOGRAPHY; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PULMONARY EMBOLISM; RADIATION DOSAGE; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENOUS THROMBOSIS;

EID: 79952275996     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.10.5830     Document Type: Review

References (90)

1. Torbicki A, Perrier A, Konstantinides S, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2008; 29:2276-2315
2. Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2006; 354:2317-2327 (Pubitemid 43801277)
3. Nikolaou K, Thieme S, Sommer W, Johnson T, Reiser MF. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism: new computed tomography applications. J Thorac Imaging 2010; 25:151-160
4. Kelly AM, Patel S, Carlos RC, Cronin P, Kazerooni EA. Multidetector row CT pulmonary angiography and indirect venography for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolic disease in intensive care unit patients. Acad Radiol 2006; 13:486-495
5. Sandler DA, Martin JF. Autopsy proven pulmonary embolism in hospital patients: are we detecting enough deep vein thrombosis? J R Soc Med 1989; 82:203-205 (Pubitemid 19086881)
6. Remy-Jardin M, Pistolesi M, Goodman LR, et al. Management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism in the era of CT angiography: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2007; 245:315-329 (Pubitemid 47612510)
7. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED d-dimer. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83:416-420 (Pubitemid 30148355)
8. Le Gal G, Righini M, Roy PM, et al. Prediction of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: the revised Geneva score. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144:165-171 (Pubitemid 46780688)
9. Miniati M, Pistolesi M. Assessing the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism. Q J Nucl Med 2001; 45:287-293 (Pubitemid 34411229)
10. Stein PD, Sostman HD, Bounameaux H, et al. Challenges in the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Med 2008; 121:565-571 (Pubitemid 351876182)
11. Hoellerich VL, Wigton RS. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism using clinical findings. Arch Intern Med 1986; 146:1699-1704 (Pubitemid 16018907)
12. Goggs R, Benigni L, Fuentes VL, Chan DL. Pulmonary thromboembolism. J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio) 2009; 19:30-52
13. Stein PD, Woodard PK, Weg JG, et al. Diagnostic pathways in acute pulmonary embolism: recommendations of the PIOPED II investigators. Radiology 2007; 242:15-21 (Pubitemid 44956005)
14. Parker MS, Hui FK, Camacho MA, Chung JK, Broga DW, Sethi NN. Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR 2005; 185:1228-1233
15. Sostman HD, Stein PD, Gottschalk A, Matta F, Hull R, Goodman L. Acute pulmonary embolism: sensitivity and specificity of ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy in PIOPED II study. Radiology 2008; 246:941-946
16. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135:98-107 (Pubitemid 32661192)
17. Sostman HD, Miniati M, Gottschalk A, Matta F, Stein PD, Pistolesi M. Sensitivity and specificity of perfusion scintigraphy combined with chest radiography for acute pulmonary embolism in PIOPED II. J Nucl Med 2008; 49:1741-1748
18. Stein PD, Freeman LM, Sostman HD, et al. SPECT in acute pulmonary embolism. J Nucl Med 2009; 50:1999-2007
19. Williams JR, Wilcox C, Andrews GJ, Burns RR. Angiography in pulmonary embolism. JAMA 1963; 184:473-476
20. Dalen JE, Brooks HL, Johnson LW, Meister SG, Szucs MM Jr, Dexter L. Pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism: indications, techniques, and results in 367 patients. Am Heart J 1971; 81:175-185
21. Hudson ER, Smith TP, McDermott VG, et al. Pulmonary angiography performed with iopamidol: complications in 1,434 patients. Radiology 1996; 198:61-65 (Pubitemid 26008241)
22. van Beek EJ, Reekers JA, Batchelor DA, Brandjes DP, Buller HR. Feasibility, safety and clinical utility of angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 1996; 6:415-419 (Pubitemid 126462794)
23. Quinn MF, Lundell CJ, Klotz TA, et al. Reliability of selective pulmonary arteriography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. AJR 1987; 149:469-471 (Pubitemid 17145122)
24. Diffin DC, Leyendecker JR, Johnson SP, Zucker RJ, Grebe PJ. Effect of anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of pulmonary angiography. AJR 1998; 171:1085-1089 (Pubitemid 28449981)
25. Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A. Reassessment of pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: relation of interpreter agreement to the order of the involved pulmonary arterial branch. Radiology 1999; 210:689-691 (Pubitemid 29124028)
26. [No authors listed]. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED investigators. JAMA 1990; 263:2753-2759
27. Baile EM, King GG, Muller NL, et al. Spiral computed tomography is comparable to angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161:1010-1015 (Pubitemid 30171765)
28. Wittram C, Waltman AC, Shepard JA, Halpern E, Goodman LR. Discordance between CT and angiography in the PIOPED II study. Radiology 2007; 244:883-889 (Pubitemid 47292101)
29. Novelline RA, Baltarowich OH, Athanasoulis CA, Waltman AC, Greenfield AJ, McKusick KA. The clinical course of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a negative pulmonary arteriogram. Radiology 1978; 126:561-567 (Pubitemid 8291764)
30. Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, et al. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 1992; 85:462-468
31. Henry JW, Relyea B, Stein PD. Continuing risk of thromboemboli among patients with normal pulmonary angiograms. Chest 1995; 107:1375-1378
32. van Beek EJ, Brouwerst EM, Song B, Stein PD, Oudkerk M. Clinical validity of a normal pulmonary angiogram in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a critical review. Clin Radiol 2001; 56:838-842 (Pubitemid 35023815)
33. Stein PD, Chenevert TL, Fowler SE, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann Intern Med 2010; 152:434-443
34. Stein PD, Beemath A, Quinn DA, et al. Usefulness of multidetector spiral computed tomography according to age and gender for diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99:1303-1305 (Pubitemid 46659870)
35. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH, et al. Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293:2012-2017 (Pubitemid 40570895)
36. Remy-Jardin M, Faivre JB, Pontana F, et al. Thoracic applications of dual energy. Radiol Clin North Am 2010; 48:193-205
37. Kalva SP, Jagannathan JP, Hahn PF, Wicky ST. Venous thromboembolism: indirect CT venography during CT pulmonary angiography-should the pelvis be imaged? Radiology 2008; 246:605-611
38. Goodman LR, Stein PD, Beemath A, et al. CT venography for deep venous thrombosis: continuous images versus reformatted discontinuous images using PIOPED II data. AJR 2007; 189:409-412 (Pubitemid 47195927)
39. Katz DS, Loud PA, Bruce D, et al. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography: a comprehensive review. RadioGraphics 2002; 22[spec no]:S3-S19; discussion, S20-S24 (Pubitemid 41569694)
40. Goodman LR, Stein PD, Matta F, et al. CT venography and compression sonography are diagnostically equivalent: data from PIOPED II. AJR 2007; 189:1071-1076 (Pubitemid 350032993)
41. Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC, et al. d-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140:589-602
42. Singh J, Daftary A. Iodinated contrast media and their adverse reactions. J Nucl Med Technol 2008; 36:69-74; quiz, 76-77
43. Cochran ST. Anaphylactoid reactions to radiocontrast media. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2005; 5:28-31 (Pubitemid 40310254)
44. Cochran ST, Bomyea K, Sayre JW. Trends in adverse events after IV administration of contrast media. AJR 2001; 176:1385-1388 (Pubitemid 32510247)
45. Bierry G, Kellner F, Barnig C. Management of patients with history of adverse effects to contrast media when pulmonary artery CT angiography is required. (letter) Radiology 2007; 245:919-921; author reply, 919-921
46. Waybill MM, Waybill PN. Contrast media-induced nephrotoxicity: identification of patients at risk and algorithms for prevention. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:3-9 (Pubitemid 32095670)
47. Merten GJ, Burgess WP, Gray LV, et al. Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy with sodium bicarbonate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 291:2328-2334 (Pubitemid 38656299)
48. Zoungas S, Ninomiya T, Huxley R, et al. Systematic review: sodium bicarbonate treatment regimens for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151:631-638
49. Vasheghani-Farahani A, Sadigh G, Kassaian SE, et al. Sodium bicarbonate plus isotonic saline versus saline for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 2009; 54:610-618
50. Levy EM, Viscoli CM, Horwitz RI. The effect of acute renal failure on mortality: a cohort analysis. JAMA 1996; 275:1489-1494 (Pubitemid 26140761)
51. Kelly AM, Dwamena B, Cronin P, Bernstein SJ, Carlos RC. Meta-analysis: effectiveness of drugs for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy. Ann Intern Med 2008; 148:284-294 (Pubitemid 351665489)
52. Gonzales DA, Norsworthy KJ, Kern SJ, et al. A meta-analysis of N-acetylcysteine in contrast-induced nephrotoxicity: unsupervised clustering to resolve heterogeneity. BMC Med 2007; 5:32
53. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, et al. Radiation dose savings for adult pulmonary embolus 64-MDCT using bismuth breast shields, lower peak kilovoltage, and automatic tube current modulation. AJR 2009; 192:244-253
54. Task Group on Control of Radiation Dose in Computed Tomography. Managing patient dose in computed tomography: a report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 2000; 30:7-45
55. Hurwitz LM, Reiman RE, Yoshizumi TT, et al. Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: implications for cancer induction. Radiology 2007; 245:742-750 (Pubitemid 350127344)
56. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007; 298:317-323 (Pubitemid 47080486)
57. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:2277-2284 (Pubitemid 350190758)
58. Shahir K, Goodman LR, Tali A, Thorsen KM, Hellman RS. Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: CT pulmonary angiography versus perfusion scanning. AJR 2010; 195:669; [web]W214-W220
59. Cook JV, Kyriou J. Radiation from CT and perfusion scanning in pregnancy. BMJ 2005; 331:350
60. Winer-Muram HT, Boone JM, Brown HL, Jennings SG, Mabie WC, Lombardo GT. Pulmonary embolism in pregnant patients: fetal radiation dose with helical CT. Radiology 2002; 224:487-492 (Pubitemid 34809132)
61. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi T, Reiman RE, et al. Radiation dose to the fetus from body MDCT during early gestation. AJR 2006; 186:871-876 (Pubitemid 46100280)
62. Ridge CA, McDermott S, Freyne BJ, Brennan DJ, Collins CD, Skehan SJ. Pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: comparison of pulmonary CT angiography and lung scintigraphy. AJR 2009; 193:1223-1227
63. Webb JA, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK. The use of iodinated and gadolinium contrast media during pregnancy and lactation. Eur Radiol 2005; 15:1234-1240 (Pubitemid 40778748)
64. Taffoni MJ, Ravenel JG, Ackerman SJ. Prospective comparison of indirect CT venography versus venous sonography in ICU patients. AJR 2005; 185:457-462
65. Elliott CG. Pulmonary embolism diagnosis in hospitalized and intensive care unit patients. Semin Vasc Med 2001; 1:205-212
66. Licht A, Sibbald WJ, Levin PD. Computerised tomography for the detection of pulmonary emboli in intensive care patients: a retrospective cohort study. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008; 36:13-19 (Pubitemid 351211868)
67. Ravenel JG, Northam MC, Nguyen SA. Negative predictive value of computed tomography pulmonary angiography with indirect computed tomography venography in intensive care unit patients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2009; 33:739-742
68. Ryu JH, Olson EJ, Pellikka PA. Clinical recognition of pulmonary embolism: problem of unrecognized and asymptomatic cases. Mayo Clin Proc 1998; 73:873-879 (Pubitemid 28411331)
69. Egermayer P, Town GI. The clinical significance of pulmonary embolism: uncertainties and implications for treatment-a debate. J Intern Med 1997; 241:5-10 (Pubitemid 27051197)
70. Swensen SJ, Sheedy PF 2nd, Ryu JH, et al. Outcomes after withholding anticoagulation from patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative computed tomographic findings: a cohort study. Mayo Clin Proc 2002; 77:130-138 (Pubitemid 34118888)
71. Moores LK, Jackson WL Jr, Shorr AF, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: outcomes in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism managed with computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:866-874 (Pubitemid 39601181)
72. Nielsen HK, Husted SE, Krusell LR, Fasting H, Charles P, Hansen HH. Silent pulmonary embolism in patients with deep venous thrombosis: incidence and fate in a randomized, controlled trial of anticoagulation versus no anticoagulation. J Intern Med 1994; 235:457-461 (Pubitemid 24212811)
73. Stein PD, Henry JW, Relyea B. Untreated patients with pulmonary embolism: outcome, clinical, and laboratory assessment. Chest 1995; 107:931-935
74. Schultz DJ, Brasel KJ, Washington L, et al. Incidence of asymptomatic pulmonary embolism in moderately to severely injured trauma patients. J Trauma 2004; 56:727-731; discussion, 731-733
75. Eyer BA, Goodman LR, Washington L. Clinicians' response to radiologists' reports of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism or inconclusive interpretation of pulmonary embolism using MDCT. AJR 2005; 184:623-628 (Pubitemid 46657275)
76. van Beek EJ, Kuijer PM, Buller HR, Brandjes DP, Bossuyt PM, ten Cate JW. The clinical course of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157:2593-2598 (Pubitemid 27519979)
77. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Ginsberg JS, et al. A noninvasive strategy for the treatment of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154:289-297 (Pubitemid 24055881)
78. Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 1998; 129:997-1005 (Pubitemid 29005822)
79. Goodman LR. Small pulmonary emboli: what do we know? Radiology 2005; 234:654-658 (Pubitemid 40250805)
80. Worsley DF, Palevsky HI, Alavi A. A detailed evaluation of patients with acute pulmonary embolism and low- or very-low-probability lung scan interpretations. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154:2737-2741 (Pubitemid 24378445)
81. Levine MN, Hirsh J, Gent M, et al. Optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy: a randomized trial comparing four weeks with three months of warfarin in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 1995; 74:606-611
82. British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Pulmonary Embolism Guideline Development Group. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax 2003; 58:470-483
83. Levine MN, Raskob G, Beyth RJ, Kearon C, Schulman S. Hemorrhagic complications of anti-coagulant treatment: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126[suppl]:287S-310S
84. Miller GA, Sutton GC, Kerr IH, Gibson RV, Honey M. Comparison of streptokinase and heparin in treatment of isolated acute massive pulmonary embolism. Br Heart J 1971; 33:616
85. Walsh PN, Stengle JM, Sherry S. The urokinase-pulmonary embolism trial. Circulation 1969; 39:153-156
86. Bankier AA, Janata K, Fleischmann D, et al. Severity assessment of acute pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: evaluation of two modified angiographic scores and comparison with clinical data. J Thorac Imaging 1997; 12:150-158 (Pubitemid 27273591)
87. Qanadli SD, El Hajjam M, Vieillard-Baron A, et al. New CT index to quantify arterial obstruction in pulmonary embolism: comparison with angiographic index and echocardiography. AJR 2001; 176:1415-1420 (Pubitemid 32510254)
88. Mastora I, Remy-Jardin M, Masson P, et al. Severity of acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation of a new spiral CT angiographic score in correlation with echocardiographic data. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:29-35 (Pubitemid 36790488)
89. Dentali F, Ageno W, Becattini C, et al. Prevalence and clinical history of incidental, asymptomatic pulmonary embolism: a meta-analysis. Thromb Res 2010; 125:518-522
90. Gladish GW, Choe DH, Marom EM, Sabloff BS, Broemeling LD, Munden RF. Incidental pulmonary emboli in oncology patients: prevalence, CT evaluation, and natural history. Radiology 2006; 240:246-255 (Pubitemid 43902616)