Accuracy of diagnostic mammography and breast ultrasound during pregnancy and lactation

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 196, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 716-722

  Robbins, Jessica ^a   Jeffries, Deborah ^b   Roubidoux, Marilyn ^b   Helvie, Mark ^b  

^a University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast; Lactation; Mammography; Pregnancy; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST DISCHARGE; BREAST LESION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LACTATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTALGIA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUERPERIUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; BIOPSY; BREAST DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LACTATION; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 79952265710     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3662     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Obenauer S, Dammert S. Palpable masses in breast during lactation. Clin Imaging 2007; 31:1-5 (Pubitemid 46001707)
2. Sabate JM, Clotet M, Torrubia S, et al. Radiologic evaluation of breast disorders related to pregnancy and lactation. RadioGraphics 2007; 27:S101-S124
3. Swinford AE, Adler DD, Garver KA. Mammographic appearance of the breasts during pregnancy and lactation: false assumptions. Acad Radiol 1998; 5:467-472 (Pubitemid 28303902)
4. Hogge JP, De Paredes ES, Magnant CM, Lage J. Imaging and management of breast masses during pregnancy and lactation. Breast J 1999; 5:272-283 (Pubitemid 29365326)
5. Ahn BY, Kim HH, Moon WK, et al. Pregnancy- and lactation-associated breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findings. J Ultrasound Med 2003; 22:491-497, quiz 498
6. Yang WT, Dryden MJ, Gwyn K, Whitman GJ, Theriault R. Imaging of breast cancer diagnosed and treated with chemotherapy during pregnancy. Radiology 2006; 239:52-60
7. Kopans D. Breast imaging, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven, 2007
8. Bock K, Hadji P, Ramaswamy A, Schmidt S, Duda VF. Rationale for a diagnostic chain in gestational breast tumor diagnosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2006; 273:337-345
9. Son EJ, Oh KK, Kim EK. Pregnancy-associated breast disease: radiologic features and diagnostic dilemmas. Yonsei Med J 2006; 47:34-42 (Pubitemid 43349408)
10. Liberman L, Giess CS, Dershaw DD, Deutch BM, Petrek JA. Imaging of pregnancy-associated breast cancer. Radiology 1994; 191:245-248 (Pubitemid 24098239)
11. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, et al. Births: final data for 2005. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2007; 56:1-103
12. American College of Radiology. BI-RADS: mammography, 4th ed. In: Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
13. American College of Radiology. BI-RADS: ultrasound, 1st ed. In: Breast imaging reporting and data system: BI-RADS atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003
14. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer. Vol. 2. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2008.
15. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis guidelines. Vol. 1. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 2008.
16. Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology 2005; 235:775-790 (Pubitemid 40695870)
17. Shaw de Paredes E, Marsteller LP, Eden BV. Breast cancers in women 35 years of age and younger: mammographic findings. Radiology 1990; 177:117-119 (Pubitemid 20317332)
18. Sechopoulos I, Suryanarayanan S, Vedantham S, D'Orsi CJ, Karellas A. Radiation dose to organs and tissues from mammography: Monte Carlo and phantom study. Radiology 2008; 246:434-443